Application of distance sampling to estimate population densities of large herbivores in Kruger National Park
J. M. Kruger A , B. K. Reilly B C and I. J. Whyte AA South African National Parks, Private Bag X402, Skukuza 1350, Republic of South Africa.
B Department of Nature Conservation, Tshwane University of Technology, Private Bag X680, Pretoria 0002, Republic of South Africa.
C Corresponding author. Email: reillybk@tut.ac.za
Wildlife Research 35(4) 371-376 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR07084
Submitted: 4 July 2007 Accepted: 5 June 2008 Published: 27 June 2008
Abstract
Aerial surveys have been used in the Kruger National Park, South Africa, to count large ungulates since the late 1970s. After 1998, aerial line-transect sampling using fixed-wing aircraft and Distance analyses replaced the ‘total’ counting method. This paper investigates these methods and three sampling intensities for estimating the densities of nine large ungulate species in Kruger National Park. Estimates suitable for the detection of population trends and making management decisions were decided by examination of coefficients of variation (set <20%, a priori). Despite the likely violation of some key assumptions of Distance sampling methods, analyses gave population estimates with adequate coefficients of variation for monitoring trends in impala, giraffe, zebra, kudu, white rhinoceros, and elephant bull populations. Significant improvements in precision were obtained at higher sampling intensities for kudu, giraffe, bull elephants and white rhinoceros, but these species already had sufficiently precise population estimates for the detection of trends at the lowest sampling intensity (15%). The estimates for warthog, wildebeest and waterbuck populations were, however, insufficiently precise for assessing population trends. Increasing sampling intensity to 22% and higher did not significantly increase the precision of the Distance estimates for these species. Shortcomings in interpretation of the data caused by violations of critical assumptions of analyses are identified and discussed.
Acknowledgements
We thank all the observers who have contributed to aerial surveys of mammals at KNP since 1998. The suggestions of Glenn Edwards, Peter Fleming and an anonymous referee improved the manuscript.
Barry, S.C. , and Welsh, A.H. (2001). Distance sampling methodology. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 63, 31–53.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Caughley, G. , and Goddard, J. (1975). Abundance and distribution of elephants in the Luangwa Valley Zambia East African Wildlife Journal 13, 39–48.
Eiselen, R. (1994). Estimating the trends in herbivore numbers in the southern district of the Kruger National Park. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 24, 95–100.
Fewster, R. M. , Laake, J. L. , and Buckland, S. T. (2005). Line transect sampling in small and large regions. Biometrics 61, 856–861.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed |
Joubert, S. C. J. , and Viljoen, P. C. (1988). Ecological aerial monitoring in the Kruger National Park. South African National Scientific Programmes Report 157, 308–310.
Khaemba, W. M. , and Stein, A. (2002). Improving sampling of wildlife populations using airborne surveys. Wildlife Research 29, 269–275.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tosh, C. A. , Reyers, B. , and van Jaarsveld, A. S. (2004). Estimating the abundances of large herbivores in the Kruger National Park using presence–absence data. Animal Conservation 7, 55–61.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Walters, C. , and Holling, C. S. (1990). Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71, 2060–2068.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Whyte, I. J. , and Joubert, S. C. J. (1988). Blue wildebeest population trends in the Kruger National Park and the effects of fencing. South African Journal of Wildlife Research 18, 78–87.