Register      Login
Wildlife Research Wildlife Research Society
Ecology, management and conservation in natural and modified habitats
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Spatial ecology of invasive Bennett’s wallaby in South Island, New Zealand

A. David M. Latham https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4403-6588 A * , M. Cecilia Latham https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0081-603X A and Bruce Warburton A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln 7640, New Zealand.

* Correspondence to: lathamd@landcareresearch.co.nz

Handling Editor: Shannon Dundas

Wildlife Research 50(12) 1109-1122 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR22127
Submitted: 14 July 2022  Accepted: 3 February 2023   Published: 2 March 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Context: Bennett’s wallaby (Notamacropus rufogriseus) was introduced into New Zealand in the late-1800s, and has subsequently become a significant pest to agriculture, silviculture, and native vegetation. Effective management of wallabies requires robust spatial and temporal ecological information, which can be used operationally to increase detection and kill rates.

Aims: To determine home range size and shape, resource (i.e. habitat and topography) selection, and daily movement patterns of three populations of Bennett’s wallaby in the South Island.

Methods: We attached GPS-collars to 38 adult wallabies (17 females, 21 males) between May 2018 and May 2019, and obtained usable location data from 30 individuals. We used kernel density estimators and resource selection functions to quantify seasonal home ranges and resource selection, respectively.

Key results: The mean seasonal home range sizes of males and females were similar (26.8 ha and 24.8 ha, respectively; combined range = 1.2–101.9 ha), although the largest home ranges belonged to large males. Resource selection was strongly influenced by distance to concealment cover, ridgelines and streams, i.e. wallabies selected to be closer to these features, though not necessarily at them. Wallabies selected areas close to concealment cover throughout 24-h periods, but most strongly during the day, which is when they bed in dense cover. Wallabies sampled outside of peak breeding moved most during dusk and dawn (median = ~50 m/h), whereas those sampled during peak breeding moved widely during day, dusk, and night (110–280 m/h), but not dawn (median = ~50 m/h).

Conclusions: The home range sizes of wallabies in New Zealand were highly variable, but on average were similar for males and females. Wallabies selected pasture close to areas with some cover, suggesting a trade-off between access to high-quality forage and concealment cover.

Implications: Our results provide robust data for modelling management strategies for wallabies, and contribute directly to operational planning by identifying habitats where wallabies are most likely to be found temporally. This information can be used to determine the appropriate survey methods and control tools to maximise detection rates and kill rates of wallabies, based on habitat.

Keywords: damage, eradication, home range ecology, invasive mammalian herbivore, Macropodidae, movement behaviour, Notamacropus rufogriseus, pest management, red-necked wallaby, resource selection, South Canterbury, sustained control.


References

Arnold, GW, Steven, DE, and Weeldenburg, JR (1989). The use of surrounding farmland by western grey kangaroos living in a remnant of Wandoo woodland and their impact on crop production. Wildlife Research 16, 85–93.
The use of surrounding farmland by western grey kangaroos living in a remnant of Wandoo woodland and their impact on crop production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ball, SJ, Ramsey, D, Nugent, G, Warburton, B, and Efford, M (2005). A method for estimating wildlife detection probabilities in relation to home-range use: insights from a field study on the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). Wildlife Research 32, 217–227.
A method for estimating wildlife detection probabilities in relation to home-range use: insights from a field study on the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bates, D, Mächler, M, Bolker, B, and Walker, S (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48.
Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bjørneraas, K, Van Moorter, B, Rolandsen, CM, and Herfindal, I (2010). Screening global positioning system location data for errors using animal movement characteristics. The Journal of Wildlife Management 74, 1361–1366.
Screening global positioning system location data for errors using animal movement characteristics.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boyce, MS (2006). Scale for resource selection functions. Diversity and Distributions 12, 269–276.
Scale for resource selection functions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boyce, MS, Vernier, PR, Nielsen, SE, and Schmiegelow, FKA (2002). Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecological Modelling 157, 281–300.
Evaluating resource selection functions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Boyle, SA, Lourenco, WC, da Silva, LR, and Smith, AT (2008). Home range estimates vary with sample size and methods. Folia Primatologica 80, 33–42.
Home range estimates vary with sample size and methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) ‘Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach.’ 2nd edn. (Springer: New York, NY, USA)

Calenge, C (2006). The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecological Modelling 197, 516–519.
The package “adehabitat” for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Casper, RM (2009). Guidelines for the instrumentation of wild birds and mammals. Animal Behaviour 78, 1477–1483.
Guidelines for the instrumentation of wild birds and mammals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Catt DC (1975) Growth, reproduction and mortality in Bennett’s wallaby (Macropus rufogriseus fruticus) in South Canterbury, New Zealand. MSc Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Catt, DC (1977). The breeding biology of Bennett’s wallaby (Macropus rufogriseus fruticus) in South Canterbury, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 4, 401–411.
The breeding biology of Bennett’s wallaby (Macropus rufogriseus fruticus) in South Canterbury, New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Côté, SD, Rooney, TP, Tremblay, J-P, Dussault, C, and Waller, DM (2004). Ecological impacts of deer overabundance. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35, 113–147.
Ecological impacts of deer overabundance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dolman, PM, and Wäber, K (2008). Ecosystem and competition impacts of introduced deer. Wildlife Research 35, 202–214.
Ecosystem and competition impacts of introduced deer.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Efford, M (2004). Density estimation in live-trapping studies. Oikos 106, 598–610.
Density estimation in live-trapping studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ekanayake, JC, and Hedley, CB (2018). Advances in information provision from wireless sensor networks for irrigated crops. Wireless Sensor Network 10, 71–92.
Advances in information provision from wireless sensor networks for irrigated crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Eldridge MDB, Coulson GM (2015) Family Macropodidae (kangaroos and wallabies). In ‘Handbook of mammals of the world. Vol. 5’. (Eds DE Wilson, RA Mittermeier) pp. 630–735. (Lynx Edicions: Barcelona, Spain)

ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute) (2022) ‘ArcGIS: release 2.9.3.’ (Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI): Redlands, CA, USA)

Fieberg, J, Matthiopoulos, J, Hebblewhite, M, Boyce, MS, and Frair, JL (2010). Correlation and studies of habitat selection: problem, red herring or opportunity? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365, 2233–2244.
Correlation and studies of habitat selection: problem, red herring or opportunity?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Forester, JD, Im, HK, and Rathouz, PJ (2009). Accounting for animal movement in estimation of resource selection functions: sampling and data analysis. Ecology 90, 3554–3565.
Accounting for animal movement in estimation of resource selection functions: sampling and data analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Frair, JL, Fieberg, J, Hebblewhite, M, Cagnacci, F, DeCesare, NJ, and Pedrotti, L (2010). Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 365, 2187–2200.
Resolving issues of imprecise and habitat-biased locations in ecological analyses using GPS telemetry data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Garnick, S, and Coulson, G (2021). Population persistence, breeding seasonality and sexual dimorphism in the red-necked wallaby. Australian Mammalogy 43, 290–299.
Population persistence, breeding seasonality and sexual dimorphism in the red-necked wallaby.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Garnick, S, Di Stefano, J, Elgar, MA, and Coulson, G (2014). Inter- and intraspecific effects of body size on habitat use among sexually-dimorphic macropodids. Oikos 123, 984–992.
Inter- and intraspecific effects of body size on habitat use among sexually-dimorphic macropodids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Garnick, S, Di Stefano, J, Elgar, MA, and Coulson, G (2016). Ecological specialisation in habitat selection within a macropodid herbivore guild. Oecologia 180, 823–832.
Ecological specialisation in habitat selection within a macropodid herbivore guild.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gillies, CS, Hebblewhite, M, Nielsen, SE, Krawchuk, MA, Aldridge, CL, Frair, JL, Saher, DJ, Stevens, CE, and Jerde, CL (2006). Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals. Journal of Animal Ecology 75, 887–898.
Application of random effects to the study of resource selection by animals.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Girard, I, Ouellet, J-P, Courtois, R, Dussault, C, and Breton, L (2002). Effects of sampling effort based on GPS telemetry on home-range size estimations. Journal of Wildlife Management 66, 1290–1300.
Effects of sampling effort based on GPS telemetry on home-range size estimations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gordon, I, Snape, M, Fletcher, D, Howland, B, Coulson, G, Festa-Bianchet, M, Caley, P, McIntyre, S, Pople, T, Wimpenny, C, Baines, G, and Alcock, D (2021). Herbivore management for biodiversity conservation: a case study of kangaroos in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). Ecological Management & Restoration 22, 124–137.
Herbivore management for biodiversity conservation: a case study of kangaroos in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Harper, GA, van Dinther, M, Russell, JC, and Bunbury, N (2015). The response of black rats (Rattus rattus) to evergreen and seasonally arid habitats: informing eradication planning on a tropical island. Biological Conservation 185, 66–74.
The response of black rats (Rattus rattus) to evergreen and seasonally arid habitats: informing eradication planning on a tropical island.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hone J (2007) ‘Wildlife damage control.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)

Howard WE (1958) ‘The rabbit problem in New Zealand.’ (Department of Scientific and Industrial Research Information Series 16: Wellington, New Zealand)

Jaksic, FM (1998). Vertebrate invaders and their ecological impacts in Chile. Biodiversity and Conservation 7, 1427–1445.
Vertebrate invaders and their ecological impacts in Chile.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnson, DH (1980). The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61, 65–71.
The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnson, CN (1987). Macropod studies at Wallaby Creek. 4. Home range and movements of the red-necked wallaby. Australian Wildlife Research 14, 125–132.
Macropod studies at Wallaby Creek. 4. Home range and movements of the red-necked wallaby.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnson, CN (1989). Grouping and the structure of association in the red-necked wallaby. Journal of Mammalogy 70, 18–26.
Grouping and the structure of association in the red-necked wallaby.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnson, CJ, Nielsen, SE, Merrill, EH, McDonald, TL, and Boyce, MS (2006). Resource selection functions based on use–availability data: theoretical motivation and evaluation methods. Journal of Wildlife Management 70, 347–357.
Resource selection functions based on use–availability data: theoretical motivation and evaluation methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Latham ADM (2019) A prioritisation roadmap for the detectability and home range parameters, g0 and sigma, for New Zealand’s invasive mammalian predators. Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research Contract Report LC3647 for Taranaki Taku Tūranga, Lincoln, New Zealand.

Latham ADM, Warburton B (2021) Notamacropus eugenii, N. r. rufogriseus, N. parma, N. dorsalis, Petrogale penicillata, Wallabia bicolor. Family Macropodidae. In ‘The handbook of New Zealand mammals’. 3rd edn. (Eds CM King, DM Forsyth) pp. 1–26. (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)

Latham, ADM, Latham, MC, Knopff, KH, Hebblewhite, M, and Boutin, S (2013). Wolves, white-tailed deer, and beaver: implications of seasonal prey switching for woodland caribou declines. Ecography 36, 1276–1290.
Wolves, white-tailed deer, and beaver: implications of seasonal prey switching for woodland caribou declines.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Latham, ADM, Latham, MC, Anderson, DP, Cruz, J, Herries, D, and Hebblewhite, M (2015). The GPS craze: six questions to address before deciding to deploy GPS technology on wildlife. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 39, 143–152.

Latham, ADM, Latham, MC, Nugent, G, Smith, J, and Warburton, B (2016). Refining operational practice for controlling introduced European rabbits on agricultural lands in New Zealand. PLoS ONE 11, .
Refining operational practice for controlling introduced European rabbits on agricultural lands in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Latham, ADM, Latham, MC, and Warburton, B (2019). Current and predicted future distributions of wallabies in mainland New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 46, 31–47.
Current and predicted future distributions of wallabies in mainland New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Latham, ADM, Latham, MC, Norbury, GL, Forsyth, DM, and Warburton, B (2020a). A review of the damage caused by invasive wild mammalian herbivores to primary production in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 47, 20–52.
A review of the damage caused by invasive wild mammalian herbivores to primary production in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Latham, ADM, Davidson, B, Warburton, B, Yockney, I, and Hampton, JO (2020b). Efficacy and animal welfare impacts of novel capture methods for two species of invasive wild mammals in New Zealand. Animals 10, .
Efficacy and animal welfare impacts of novel capture methods for two species of invasive wild mammals in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Latham, ADM, Warburton, B, Latham, MC, Anderson, DP, Howard, SW, and Binny, RN (2021). Detection probabilities and surveillance sensitivities for managing an invasive mammalian herbivore. Ecosphere 12, .
Detection probabilities and surveillance sensitivities for managing an invasive mammalian herbivore.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Leblond, M, Frair, J, Fortin, D, Dussault, C, Ouellet, J-P, and Courtois, R (2011). Assessing the influence of resource covariates at multiple spatial scales: an application to forest-dwelling caribou faced with intensive human activity. Landscape Ecology 26, 1433–1446.
Assessing the influence of resource covariates at multiple spatial scales: an application to forest-dwelling caribou faced with intensive human activity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

le Mar, K, and McArthur, C (2000). Relocating radio-collared targeted marsupials after a 1080-poisoning operation. Tasforests 12, 155–160.

le Mar, K, and McArthur, C (2001). Changes in marsupial herbivore densities in relation to a forestry 1080-poisoning operation. Australian Forestry 64, 175–180.
Changes in marsupial herbivore densities in relation to a forestry 1080-poisoning operation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

le Mar, K, and McArthur, C (2005). Comparison of habitat selection by two sympatric macropods, Thylogale billardierii and Macropus rufogriseus rufogriseus, in a patchy eucalypt–forestry environment. Austral Ecology 30, 674–683.
Comparison of habitat selection by two sympatric macropods, Thylogale billardierii and Macropus rufogriseus rufogriseus, in a patchy eucalypt–forestry environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

le Mar, K, McArthur, C, and Statham, M (2003). Home ranges of sympatric red-necked wallabies, red-bellied pademelons and common brushtail possums in a temperate eucalypt forestry environment. Australian Mammalogy 25, 183–191.
Home ranges of sympatric red-necked wallabies, red-bellied pademelons and common brushtail possums in a temperate eucalypt forestry environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Long JL (2003) ‘Introduced mammals of the world.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Vic., Australia)

Mackenzie, HR, Latham, MC, Anderson, DP, Hartley, S, Norbury, GL, and Latham, ADM (2022). Detection parameters for managing invasive rats in urban environments. Scientific Reports 12, .
Detection parameters for managing invasive rats in urban environments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, McDonald TL, Erickson WP (2002) ‘Resource selection by animals: statistical design and analysis for field studies.’ 2nd edn. (Kluwer: Boston, MA, USA)

McLeod S (1986) The feeding and behavioural interaction of Bennett’s wallaby (Macropus rufogriseus rufogriseus) with domestic sheep (Ovis aries) in South Canterbury, New Zealand. MSc Thesis, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.

Montgomery DC, Peck EA (1992) ‘Introduction to linear regression analysis.’ (Wiley: New York, NY, USA)

Morrison, SA, Macdonald, N, Walker, K, Lozier, L, and Shaw, MR (2007). Facing the dilemma at eradication’s end: uncertainty of absence and the Lazarus effect. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5, 271–276.
Facing the dilemma at eradication’s end: uncertainty of absence and the Lazarus effect.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nathan, R (2001). The challenges of studying dispersal. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16, 481–483.
The challenges of studying dispersal.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nugent, G, Warburton, B, Thomson, C, Cross, ML, and Coleman, MC (2012). Bait aggregation to reduce cost and toxin use in aerial 1080 baiting of small mammal pests in New Zealand. Pest Management Science 68, 1374–1379.
Bait aggregation to reduce cost and toxin use in aerial 1080 baiting of small mammal pests in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Owens, B (2017). Behind New Zealand’s wild plan to purge all pests. Nature 541, 148–150.
Behind New Zealand’s wild plan to purge all pests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parkes, J, and Murphy, E (2003). Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 30, 335–359.
Management of introduced mammals in New Zealand.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Parkes, JP, Nugent, G, Forsyth, DM, Byrom, AE, Pech, RP, Warburton, B, and Choquenot, D (2017). Past, present and two potential futures for managing New Zealand’s mammalian pests. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 41, 151–161.
Past, present and two potential futures for managing New Zealand’s mammalian pests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Putman, RJ, and Moore, NP (1998). Impact of deer in lowland Britain on agriculture, forestry and conservation habitats. Mammal Review 28, 141–164.
Impact of deer in lowland Britain on agriculture, forestry and conservation habitats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

R Development Core Team (2022) ‘R: a language and environment for statistical computing, version 4.1.3.’ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria) Available at http://www.R-project.org

Riney, T (1956). Comparison of occurrence of introduced animals with critical conservation areas to determine priorities for control. New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology 38B, 1–18.

Russell, JC, and Holmes, ND (2015). Tropical island conservation: rat eradication for species recovery. Biological Conservation 185, 1–7.
Tropical island conservation: rat eradication for species recovery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Russell, JC, Innes, JG, Brown, PH, and Byrom, AE (2015). Predator-free New Zealand: conservation country. BioScience 65, 520–525.
Predator-free New Zealand: conservation country.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Studholme EC (1954) ‘Te Waimate: early station life in New Zealand.’ (AH and AW Reed: Dunedin, New Zealand)

Thomson GM (1922) ‘The naturalisation of animals & plants in New Zealand.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK)

Warburton, B (1986). Wallabies in New Zealand: history, current status, research, and management needs. Forest Research Institute Bulletin 114, 1–29.

Warburton B, Latham ADM (2020) National wallaby research plan June 2020. Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research Contract Report LC3777 for the New Zealand Ministry for Primary Industries, Lincoln, New Zealand.

Wiggins, NL, and Bowman, DMJS (2011). Macropod habitat use and response to management interventions in an agricultural–forest mosaic in north-eastern Tasmania as inferred by scat surveys. Wildlife Research 38, 103–113.
Macropod habitat use and response to management interventions in an agricultural–forest mosaic in north-eastern Tasmania as inferred by scat surveys.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wiggins, NL, Williamson, GJ, McCallum, HI, McMahon, CR, and Bowman, DMJS (2010). Shifts in macropod home ranges in response to wildlife management interventions. Wildlife Research 37, 379–391.
Shifts in macropod home ranges in response to wildlife management interventions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Worton, BJ (1989). Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70, 164–168.
Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |