Testing automated sensor traps for mammal field studies
E. Notz A B , C. Imholt A , D. Reil A and J. Jacob A CA Julius Kühn-Institute, Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Vertebrate Research, Toppheideweg 88, Münster 48161, Germany.
B University of Münster, Institute of Landscape Ecology, Heisenbergstraße 2, 48149 Münster, Germany.
C Corresponding author. Email: jens.jacob@julius-kuehn.de
Wildlife Research 44(1) 72-77 https://doi.org/10.1071/WR16192
Submitted: 30 May 2016 Accepted: 18 January 2017 Published: 7 March 2017
Abstract
Context: Live traps are regularly used in field and enclosure studies with mammals. In some scenarios, such as, for example, when the focus is on temporal patterns or to minimise the time animals are contained inside the trap for animal-ethics reasons, it can be highly useful to be alerted immediately when an individual is trapped.
Aims: In the present study, an automated system was trialed that is designed to automatically send a signal to a receiving device (pager, computer, mobile phone) when the body heat or movement of a trapped small mammal is registered by an infrared sensor (ERMINEA permanent monitoring system for rodent detection).
Methods: Sensors were attached to Ugglan multiple-capture traps and used in laboratory conditions and in semi-natural outdoor enclosures with common voles (Microtus arvalis) and bank voles (Myodes glareolus), as well as in the field with bank voles, Apodemus species and common voles. Sensor readings were compared to visual observation and trapping results.
Key results: In enclosure and field conditions, 100% and 98.7% of traps recorded captured animals correctly. There were no sensor signals when rodents moved along the outside or in the entrance compartment of the traps. Rodents sitting on the trap door triggered the sensor in 50% of cases when there was no bedding in the trap; however, there were no sensor signals if bedding was present. In laboratory trials, 20–70% of traps were falsely triggered by large insects (crickets), depending on ambient temperature and whether bedding was in the trap.
Conclusions: Generally, the system was a reliable, flexible and easy-to-handle tool to monitor live captures. To minimise false negatives (animals trapped without signal), testing sensor function in the pre-baiting phase and software adjustments are recommended.
Implications: The sensors are compatible with various trapping and other monitoring devices, providing the potential to be used in a wide range of applications. Their use is likely to optimise study designs, especially when temporal patterns are recorded or animals or samples need to be obtained soon after capture, and to minimise stress of trapped animals because they can be removed shortly after capture.
Additional keywords: live trap, rodent, signalling device, small mammal.
References
Albanese, S., Rodriguez, D., and Ojeda, R.A. (2011). Differential use of vertical space by small mammals in the Monte Desert, Argentina. Journal of Mammalogy 92, 1270–1277.Benevides, F. L. J., Hansen, H., and Hess, S. C. (2008). Design and evaluation of a simple signaling device for live traps. The Journal of Wildlife Management 72, 1434–1436.
| Design and evaluation of a simple signaling device for live traps.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Bennett, A., and Coulson, G. (2014). Camera traps provide insight into factors influencing trap success of the swamp wallaby, Wallabia bicolor. Australian Mammalogy 36, 15–20.
| Camera traps provide insight into factors influencing trap success of the swamp wallaby, Wallabia bicolor.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Brouard, M. J., Coulson, T., Newman, C., Macdonald, D. W., and Buesching, C. D. (2015). Analysis on population level reveals trappability of wild rodents is determined by previous trap occupant. PLoS One 10, e0145006.
| Analysis on population level reveals trappability of wild rodents is determined by previous trap occupant.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Eccard, J. A., and Klemme, I. (2013). Reducing mortality of shrews in rodent live trapping: a method increasing live-trap selectivity with shrew exits. Annales Zoologici Fennici 50, 371–376.
| Reducing mortality of shrews in rodent live trapping: a method increasing live-trap selectivity with shrew exits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Fuelling, O., Klemann, N., and Endepols, S. (2011). Automatic and permanent rodent-monitoring: a proper method to evaluate rodenticide effects? Julius-Kühn-Archiv 432, 150–151.
Geduhn, A., Esther, A., Schenke, D., Mattes, H., and Jacob, J. (2014). Spatial and temporal exposure patterns in non-target small mammals during brodifacoum rat control. The Science of the Total Environment 496, 328–338.
| Spatial and temporal exposure patterns in non-target small mammals during brodifacoum rat control.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC2cXht1OisrbK&md5=907fd1ce13b0b0588f37d9167d5111e5CAS |
Gurnell, J., and Flowerdew, J. R. (1994). ‘Live Trapping Small Mammals: a Practical Guide.’ (The Mammal Society: London.)
Jacob, J., Ylönen, H., and Hodkinson, C. G. (2002). Trapping efficiency of Ugglan traps and Longworth traps for house mice in southeastern. Australian Wildlife Research 29, 101–103.
| Trapping efficiency of Ugglan traps and Longworth traps for house mice in southeastern.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Johansson, A. T., Johansson, Ö., and McCarthy, T. (2011). An automatic VHF transmitter monitoring system for wildlife research. Wildlife Society Bulletin 35, 489–493.
| An automatic VHF transmitter monitoring system for wildlife research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jones, C., Warburton, B., Carver, J., and Carver, D. (2015). Potential applications of wireless sensor networks for wildlife trapping and monitoring programs. Wildlife Society Bulletin 39, 341–348.
| Potential applications of wireless sensor networks for wildlife trapping and monitoring programs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Larkin, R. P., VanDeelen, T. R., Sabick, R. M., Gosselink, T. E., and Warner, R. E. (2003). Electronic signaling for prompt removal of an animal from a trap. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31, 392–398.
Marks, C. A. (1996). A radiotelemetry system for monitoring the treadle snare in programmes for control of wild canids. Wildlife Research 23, 381–386.
| A radiotelemetry system for monitoring the treadle snare in programmes for control of wild canids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Müller-Wille, W. (1966). Bodenplastik und Naturräume Westfalens. In ‘Spieker: Landeskundliche Beiträge und Berichte, Vol. 14‘. (Ed. W. U. E. Müller-Wille.) pp. 1–302.
Néill, L. O., Jongh, A., Jong, T., Ozolins, J., and Rochford, J. (2007). Minimizing leg‐hold trapping trauma for otters with mobile phone technology. The Journal of Wildlife Management 71, 2776–2780.
| Minimizing leg‐hold trapping trauma for otters with mobile phone technology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Nolan, J., Russell, R., and Anderka, F. (1984). Transmitters for monitoring Aldrich snares set for grizzly bears. The Journal of Wildlife Management 48, 942–945.
| Transmitters for monitoring Aldrich snares set for grizzly bears.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Shonfield, J., Do, R., Brooks, R. J., and McAdam, A. G. (2013). Reducing accidental shrew mortality associated with small-mammal livetrapping I: an inter- and intrastudy analysis. Journal of Mammalogy 94, 745–753.
| Reducing accidental shrew mortality associated with small-mammal livetrapping I: an inter- and intrastudy analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sikes, R. S., Gannon, W. L., and Mammalogists, A. C. U. C. A. S. o. (2011). Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. Journal of Mammalogy 92, 235–253.
| Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Stephens, R. B., and Anderson, E. M. (2014). Effects of trap type on small mammal richness, diversity, and mortality. Wildlife Society Bulletin 38, 619–627.
| Effects of trap type on small mammal richness, diversity, and mortality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Sutherland, D. R., and Predavec, M. (2010). Universal trap timer design to examine temporal activity of wildlife. The Journal of Wildlife Management 74, 906–909.
| Universal trap timer design to examine temporal activity of wildlife.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Vieira, E., Baumgarten, L., Paise, G., and Becker, R. (2010). Seasonal patterns and influence of temperature on the daily activity of the diurnal neotropical rodent Necromys lasiurus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 88, 259–265.
| Seasonal patterns and influence of temperature on the daily activity of the diurnal neotropical rodent Necromys lasiurus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Ylönen, H., Jacob, J., and Kotler, B. P. (2003). Trappability of rodents in single-capture and multiple-capture traps in arid and open environments: why don’t Ugglan traps work? Annales Zoologici Fennici 40, 537–541.
