Register      Login
Sexual Health Sexual Health Society
Publishing on sexual health from the widest perspective
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Experience of domestic violence routine screening in Family Planning NSW clinics

Tara Hunter A , Jessica R. Botfield A C , Jane Estoesta A , Pippa Markham A , Sarah Robertson A and Kevin McGeechan A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Family Planning NSW, 328–336 Liverpool Road, Ashfield, NSW 2131, Australia.

B Sydney School of Public Health, Edward Ford Building, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: JessicaB@fpnsw.org.au

Sexual Health 14(2) 155-163 https://doi.org/10.1071/SH16143
Submitted: 14 July 2016  Accepted: 25 September 2016   Published: 7 November 2016

Abstract

Background: This study reviewed implementation of the Domestic Violence Routine Screening (DVRS) program at Family Planning NSW and outcomes of screening to determine the feasibility of routine screening in a family planning setting and the suitability of this program in the context of women’s reproductive and sexual health. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was undertaken of eligible women attending Family Planning NSW clinics between 1 January and 31 December 2015. Modified Poisson regression was used to estimate prevalence ratios and assess association between binary outcomes and client characteristics. Results: Of 13 440 eligible women, 5491 were screened (41%). Number of visits, clinic attended, age, employment status and disability were associated with completion of screening. In all, 220 women (4.0%) disclosed domestic violence. Factors associated with disclosure were clinic attended, age group, region of birth, employment status, education and disability. Women who disclosed domestic violence were more likely to have discussed issues related to sexually transmissible infections in their consultation. All women who disclosed were assessed for any safety concerns and offered a range of suitable referral options. Conclusion: Although routine screening may not be appropriate in all health settings, given associations between domestic violence and sexual and reproductive health, a DVRS program is considered appropriate in sexual and reproductive health clinics and appears to be feasible in a service such as Family Planning NSW. Consistent implementation of the program should continue at Family Planning NSW and be expanded to other family planning services in Australia to support identification and early intervention for women affected by domestic violence.

Additional keywords: Australia, health services, intimate partner violence, sexual and reproductive health.


References

[1]  World Health Organization (WHO). Understanding and addressing violence against women: intimate partner violence. Geneva: WHO; 2012.

[2]  World Health Organization (WHO). Global and regional estimates of violence against women: prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: WHO; 2013.

[3]  Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). 4906.0 – Personal safety, Australia, 2012. Canberra: ABS; 2013. Available online at: http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4906.0Chapter1002012 [verified 4 June 2015].

[4]  Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety (ANROWS). Key statistics on violence against women. Sydney: ANROWS; 2014. Available online at: http://www.anrows.org.au/sites/default/files/Key%20statistics%20-%20all.pdf [verified 31 August 2015].

[5]  Moore AM, Frohwirth L, Miller E. Male reproductive control of women who have experienced intimate partner violence in the United States. Soc Sci Med 2010; 70 1737–44.
Male reproductive control of women who have experienced intimate partner violence in the United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Planned Parenthood Federation of America. Intimate partner violence and reproductive coercion. New York: Planned Parenthood Federation of America; 2012.

[7]  Miller E, Jordan B, Levenson R, Silverman JG. Reproductive coercion: connecting the dots between partner violence and unintended pregnancy. Contraception 2010; 81 457–9.
Reproductive coercion: connecting the dots between partner violence and unintended pregnancy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Department of Health and Ageing. National women’s health policy 2010. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2010.

[9]  Taft AJ, Watson LF, Lee C. Violence against young Australian women and association with reproductive events: a cross-sectional analysis of a national population sample. Aust N Z J Public Health 2004; 28 324–9.
Violence against young Australian women and association with reproductive events: a cross-sectional analysis of a national population sample.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Braaf R. Health impacts of domestic and family violence. Sydney: Australian Domestic & Family Violence Clearinghouse, The University of New South Wales; 2012.

[11]  Hegarty K, Gunn J, Chandra P, Taft A. Physical and social predictors of partner abuse in women attending general practice: a cross sectional study. Br J Gen Pract 2008; 58 484–7.
Physical and social predictors of partner abuse in women attending general practice: a cross sectional study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Institute of Medicine. Clinical preventive services for women: closing the gaps. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2011.

[13]  Spangaro J, Ruane J. Health interventions for family and domestic violence: a literature review. Sydney: University of New South Wales; 2014.

[14]  Spangaro JM. The NSW Health routine screening for domestic violence program. N S W Public Health Bull 2007; 18 86–9.
The NSW Health routine screening for domestic violence program.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[15]  Taft A, O’Doherty L, Hegarty K, Ramsay J, Davidson LL, Feder G. Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 4 CD007007
Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[16]  World Health Organization (WHO). Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Geneva: WHO; 2013.

[17]  NSW Department of Health. Policy and procedures for identifying and responding to domestic violence. Sydney: NSW Department of Health; 2006.

[18]  Zou G. A modified Poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159 702–6.
A modified Poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[19]  NSW Kids and Families. Domestic violence routine screening: snapshot report 11 (2013). Sydney: NSW Health; 2014.

[20]  Spangaro J, Poulos RG, Zwi AB. Pandora doesn’t live here anymore: normalization of screening for intimate partner violence in Australian antenatal, mental health and substance abuse services violence and victims. Violence Vict 2011; 26 130–44.
Pandora doesn’t live here anymore: normalization of screening for intimate partner violence in Australian antenatal, mental health and substance abuse services violence and victims.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[21]  Stayton CD, Duncan MM. Mutable influences on intimate partner abuse screening in health care settings: a synthesis of the literature. Trauma Violence Abuse 2005; 6 271–85.
Mutable influences on intimate partner abuse screening in health care settings: a synthesis of the literature.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[22]  Plummer SB, Findley PA. Women with disabilities’ experience with physical and sexual abuse: review of the literature and implications for the field. Trauma Violence Abuse 2012; 13 15–29.
Women with disabilities’ experience with physical and sexual abuse: review of the literature and implications for the field.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[23]  Frawley P, Dyson S, Robinson S, Dixon J. What does it take? Developing informed and effective tertiary responses to violence and abuse of women and girls with disabilities in Australia. Sydney: Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety; 2015.

[24]  Martin SL, Matza LS, Kupper LL, Thomas JC, Daly M, Cloutier S. Domestic violence and sexually transmitted diseases: the experience of prenatal care patients. Public Health Rep 1999; 114 262–8.
Domestic violence and sexually transmitted diseases: the experience of prenatal care patients.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvgsVKntA%3D%3D&md5=9713dd3a03138fea6fc30ed387155465CAS |

[25]  Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ, Raj A. Identifying the prevalence and correlates of STDs among women residing in rural domestic violence shelters. Women Health 2000; 30 15–26.
Identifying the prevalence and correlates of STDs among women residing in rural domestic violence shelters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FptFShsA%3D%3D&md5=a267fb7baa2b040995a3760b2ea4aa08CAS |

[26]  Campbell J, Snow Jones A, Dienemann J, Kub J, Schollenberger J, O’Campo P, Carlson Gielen A, Wynne C. Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162 1157–63.
Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[27]  Kalichman SC, Simbayi LC. Sexual assault history and risks for sexually transmitted infections among women in an African township in Cape Town, South Africa. AIDS Care 2004; 16 681–9.
Sexual assault history and risks for sexually transmitted infections among women in an African township in Cape Town, South Africa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2cvmtVKntg%3D%3D&md5=18519925d8b6849f6775daa49303ec77CAS |

[28]  Campbell JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet 2002; 359 1331–6.
Health consequences of intimate partner violence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[29]  Gazmararian JA, Petersen R, Spitz AM, Goodwin MM, Saltzman LE, Marks JS. Violence and reproductive health: current knowledge and future research directions. Matern Child Health J 2000; 4 79–84.
Violence and reproductive health: current knowledge and future research directions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvksVWqtQ%3D%3D&md5=936f5a1f03d4e03cb3bb3b3dacd07370CAS |

[30]  Hathaway JE, Mucci LA, Silverman JG, Brooks DR, Mathews R, Pavlos CA. Health status and health care use of Massachusetts women reporting partner abuse. Am J Prev Med 2000; 19 302–7.
Health status and health care use of Massachusetts women reporting partner abuse.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2FltFShsQ%3D%3D&md5=0df7700f416a91697c62641d49bbf5a5CAS |

[31]  Sarkar NN. The impact of intimate partner violence on women’s reproductive health and pregnancy outcome. J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 28 266–71.
The impact of intimate partner violence on women’s reproductive health and pregnancy outcome.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cvgtFKntw%3D%3D&md5=2c474d7e15dcedc01d0ed5cc2be2fd60CAS |

[32]  Miller E, Decker MR, McCauley HL, Tancredi DJ, Levenson RR, Waldman J, Schoenwald P, Silverman JG. Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence, and unintended pregnancy. Contraception 2010; 81 316–22.
Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence, and unintended pregnancy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[33]  Chibber KS, Krishnan S. Confronting intimate partner violence, a global health care priority. Mt Sinai J Med 2011; 78 449–57.
Confronting intimate partner violence, a global health care priority.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[34]  Fanslow J, Whitehead A, Silva M, Robinson E. Contraceptive use and associations with intimate partner violence among a population-based sample of New Zealand women. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2008; 48 83–9.
Contraceptive use and associations with intimate partner violence among a population-based sample of New Zealand women.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[35]  Fantasia HC, Sutherland MA, Fontenot HB, Lee-St. John TJ. Chronicity of partner violence, contraceptive patterns and pregnancy risk. Contraception 2012; 86 530–5.
Chronicity of partner violence, contraceptive patterns and pregnancy risk.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[36]  Decker MR, Frattaroli S, McCaw B, Coker AL, Miller E, Sharps P, Lane WG, Mandal M, Hirsch K, Strobino DM, Bennett WL, Campbell J, Gielen A. Transforming the healthcare response to intimate partner violence and taking best practices to scale. J Womens Health 2012; 21 1222–9.
Transforming the healthcare response to intimate partner violence and taking best practices to scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[37]  Tancredi DJ, Silverman JG, Decker MR, McCauley HL, Anderson HA, Jones KA, Ciaravino S, Hicks A, Raible C, Zelazny S, James L, Miller E. Cluster randomized controlled trial protocol: addressing Reproductive Coercion in Health Settings (ARCHES). BMC Womens Health 2015; 15 57
Cluster randomized controlled trial protocol: addressing Reproductive Coercion in Health Settings (ARCHES).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[38]  Spangaro J, Zwi A. After the questions: impact of routine screening for domestic violence in NSW health services. Sydney: UNSW, School of Public Health and Community Medicine; 2010.