Register      Login
Australian Journal of Primary Health Australian Journal of Primary Health Society
The issues influencing community health services and primary health care
REVIEW (Open Access)

Australian general practitioners’ views on qualities that make effective discharge communication: a scoping review

Melinda Gusmeroli A B , Stephen Perks https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8971-4373 A B * , Cassie Lanskey A B and Nicole Bates A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Townsville University Hospital, Townsville, Qld 4814, Australia.

B James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4814, Australia.

* Correspondence to: Steve.perks@my.jcu.edu.au

Australian Journal of Primary Health 29(5) 405-415 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY22231
Submitted: 18 October 2022  Accepted: 8 May 2023   Published: 1 June 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of La Trobe University. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Transitions of patient care between hospital discharge and primary care are known to be an area of high-risk where communication is imperative for patient safety. Discharge summaries are known to often be incomplete, delayed and unhelpful for community healthcare providers. The aim of this review was to identify and map the literature which discusses Australian general practitioners’ (GPs) views on the qualities that make up effective discharge communication. Medline, Scopus and the Cochrane register of controlled drug trails and systematic reviews were searched for publications until October 2021 that discussed Australian GPs’ views on discharge communication from hospital to general practice. Of 1696 articles identified, 18 met inclusion and critical appraisal criteria. Five studies identified that GPs view timeliness of discharge summary receipt to be a problem. Communication of medication information in the discharge summary was discussed in six studies, with two reporting that GPs view reasons for medication changes to be essential. Five studies noted GPs would prefer to receive clinical discipline or diagnosis specific information. Four studies identified that GPs viewed the format and readability of discharge summaries to be problematic, with difficulties finding salient information. The findings of this scoping review indicate that GPs view timeliness, completeness, readability, medication related information and diagnosis/clinical discipline specific information to be qualities that make up effective discharge communication from hospital to the community. There are opportunities for further research in perspectives of effective discharge communication, and future studies on interventions to improve discharge communication, patient safety and policy in transfers of care.

Keywords: communication, general practitioners, health education, medical record linkage, medical records, medication systems, medication therapy management, patient discharge, pharmacy administration.

References

Alderton M, Callen JL (2007) Are general practitioners satisfied with electronic discharge summaries? Health Information Management Journal 36, 7-12.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Aromataris E, Munn ZE (2020) JBI manual for evidence synthesis. Available at https://synthesismanual.jbi.global [Accessed 4 October 2021]

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare (2017a) National safety and quality health service standards. ACSQHC, Sydney.

Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (2017b) National guidelines for on-screen presentation of discharge summaries. ACSQHC, Sydney.

Belisle S, Dobrin A, Elsie S, Ali S, Brahmbhatt S, Kumar K, Jasani H, Miller M, Ferlisi F, Poonai N (2019) Video discharge instructions for acute otitis media in children: a randomized controlled open-label trial. Academic Emergency Medicine 26, 1326-1335.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Biggs MJ, Biggs TC (2020) Independent prescribing pharmacists supporting the early discharge of patients through completion of medical discharge summaries. Journal of Pharmacy Practice 33, 173-175.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Briggs AM, Lee N, Sim M, Leys TJ, Yates PJ (2012) Hospital discharge information after elective total hip or knee joint replacement surgery: a clinical audit of preferences among general practitioners. Australasian Medical Journal 5, 544-550.
| Google Scholar |

Brodribb WE, Mitchell BL, Van Driel ML (2016) Continuity of care in the post partum period: general practitioner experiences with communication. Australian Health Review 40, 484-489.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Callen JL, Alderton M, McIntosh J (2008) Evaluation of electronic discharge summaries: a comparison of documentation in electronic and handwritten discharge summaries. International Journal of Medical Informatics 77, 613-620.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Castleden WM, Stacey MC, Norman PE, Brooks JG, Spence RD, Bolton BR, Van Merwyck AJ, Faulkner KW, Minchin DE, Lawrence-Brown MMD (1992) General practitioners’ attitudes to computer-generated surgical discharge letters. The Medical Journal of Australia 157, 380-382.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Chen Y, Brennan N, Magrabi F (2010) Is email an effective method for hospital discharge communication? A randomized controlled trial to examine delivery of computer-generated discharge summaries by email, fax, post and patient hand delivery. International Journal of Medical Informatics 79(3), 167-172.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Clanet R, Bansard M, Humbert X, Marie V, Raginel T (2015) Systematic review of hospital discharge summaries and general practitioners’ wishes. Sante Publique 27(5), 701-11.
| Google Scholar |

Jiwa M, Meng X, O’Shea C, Magin P, Dadich A, Pillai V (2014) A randomised trial deploying a simulation to investigate the impact of hospital discharge letters on patient care in general practice. BMJ Open 4, e005475.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kable A, Chenoweth L, Pond D, Hullick C (2015) Health professional perspectives on systems failures in transitional care for patients with dementia and their carers: a qualitative descriptive study. BMC Health Services Research 15, 567.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kable A, Baker A, Pond D, Southgate E, Turner A, Levi C (2019) Health professionals’ perspectives on the discharge process and continuity of care for stroke survivors discharged home in regional Australia: a qualitative, descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences 21, 253-261.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Karaksha AA, Hattingh HL, Hall T (2010) Quality of discharge summaries sent by a regional hospital to general practitioners. Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research 40, 208-210.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kilgour C, Bogossian F, Callaway L, Gallois C (2019a) Experiences of women, hospital clinicians and general practitioners with gestational diabetes mellitus postnatal follow-up: a mixed methods approach. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 148, 32-42.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kilgour C, Bogossian FE, Callaway L, Gallois C (2019b) Postnatal gestational diabetes mellitus follow-up: perspectives of Australian hospital clinicians and general practitioners. Women and Birth 32, e24-e33.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kripalani S, Jackson AT, Schnipper JL, Coleman EA (2007a) Promoting effective transitions of care at hospital discharge: a review of key issues for hospitalists. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2, 314-323.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, Williams MV, Basaviah P, Baker DW (2007b) Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA 297, 831-841.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Lane N, Bragg MJ (2007) From emergency department to general practitioner: Evaluating emergency department communication and service to general practitioners. Emergency Medicine Australasia 19(4), 346-352.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Mahfouz C, Bonney A, Mullan J, Rich W (2017) An Australian discharge summary quality assessment tool: a pilot study. Australian Family Physician 46, 57-63.
| Google Scholar |

Middleton S, Appleberg M, Girgis S, Ward JE (2004) Effective discharge policy: are we getting there? Australian Health Review 28, 255-259.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Newnham HH, Gibbs HH, Ritchie ES, Hitchcock KI, Nagalingam V, Hoiles A, Wallace E, Georgeson E, Holton S (2015) A feasibility study of the provision of a personalized interdisciplinary audiovisual summary to facilitate care transfer care at hospital discharge: Care Transfer Video (CareTV). International Journal for Quality in Health Care 27, 105-109.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Newnham H, Barker A, Ritchie E, Hitchcock K, Gibbs H, Holton S (2017) Discharge communication practices and healthcare provider and patient preferences, satisfaction and comprehension: a systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 29, 752-768.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Okoniewska B, Santana MJ, Groshaus H, Stajkovic S, Cowles J, Chakrovorty D, Aghali W (2015) Barriers to discharge in an acute care medical teaching unit: a qualitative analysis of health providers’ perceptions. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 8, 83-89.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372, n71.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Rowlands S, Callen J, Westbrook J (2012) Are general practitioners getting the information they need from hospitals to manage their lung cancer patients? A qualitative exploration. Health Information Management Journal 41, 4-13.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Siegel J, Edwards E, Mooney L, Smith C, Peel JB, Dole A, Maler P, Freeman WD (2016) A feasibility pilot using a mobile personal health assistant (PHA) app to assist stroke patient and caregiver communication after hospital discharge. mHealth 2, 31.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Stainkey L, Pain T, McNichol M, Hack J, Roberts L (2010) Matched comparison of GP and consultant rating of electronic discharge summaries. Health Information Management Journal 39, 7-15.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Tandjung R, Rosemann T, Badertscher N (2011) Gaps in continuity of care at the interface between primary care and specialized care: general practitioners’ experiences and expectations. International Journal of General Medicine 4, 773-778.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Tran T, Taylor SE, George J, Pisasale D, Batrouney A, Ngo J, Stanley B, Elliott RA (2020) Evaluation of communication to general practitioners when opioid-naïve post-surgical patients are discharged from hospital on opioids. ANZ Journal of Surgery 90, 1019-1024.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Trocco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, Moher D, Peters MDJ, Horsley T, Weeks L, Hempel S, et al. (2018) PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine 169, 467-473.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Van Walraven C, Seth R, Austin PC, Laupacis A (2002) Effect of discharge summary availability during post-discharge visits on hospital readmission. Journal of General Internal Medicine 17, 186-192.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Van Walraven C, Taljaard M, Etchells E, Bell CM, Stiell IG, Zarnke K, Forster AJ (2010) The independent association of provider and information continuity on outcomes after hospital discharge: implications for hospitalists. Journal of Hospital Medicine 5, 398-405.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Williams TA, Leslie GD, Brearley L, Dobb GJ (2010) Healthcare utilisation among patients discharged from hospital after intensive care. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 38, 732-739.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |