General practitioner knowledge of and engagement with telehealth-at-home medical abortion provision
Danielle Mazza A , Jane W. Seymour B , Monisha Vaid Sandhu C , Catriona Melville C , Jacquie O’Brien C and Terri-Ann Thompson B D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations
A Department of General Practice, Monash University, Notting Hill, Vic. 3168, Australia.
B Ibis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA.
C MS Health, Melbourne, Vic. 3001, Australia.
D Corresponding author. Email: tthompson@ibisreproductivehealth.org
Australian Journal of Primary Health 27(6) 456-461 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY20297
Submitted: 11 December 2020 Accepted: 16 June 2021 Published: 16 November 2021
Abstract
In Australia, there are many barriers to abortion, particularly for women living in regional, rural and remote areas. Telehealth provision of medical abortion is safe, effective and acceptable to patients and providers. In 2015, Marie Stopes Australia (MSA) launched an at-home telehealth model for medical abortion to which GPs could refer. Between April and November of 2017, we interviewed 20 GPs who referred patients to MSA’s telehealth-at-home abortion service to better understand their experiences and perspectives regarding telehealth-at-home abortion. We found that there was widespread support and recognition of the benefits of telehealth-at-home abortion in increasing access to abortion and reducing travel and costs. However, the GPs interviewed lacked knowledge and understanding of the processes involved in medical abortion, and many were unaware of the availability of telehealth as an option until a patient requested a referral. The GPs interviewed called for increased communication between telehealth-at-home abortion providers and GPs. Increasing GP familiarity with medical abortion and awareness of the availability of telehealth-at-home abortion may assist people in accessing safe, effective medical abortion.
Keywords: induced abortion, general practice, telehealth, telemedicine, medical abortion, qualitative research, reproductive services, health service access.
References
Aiken A, Lohr PA, Lord J, Ghosh N, Starling J (2021) Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of no-test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) provided via telemedicine: a national cohort study. BJOG 128, 1464–1474.| Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of no-test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) provided via telemedicine: a national cohort study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 33605016PubMed |
AMA (2019) Ethical Issues in Reproductive Medicine 2019. Available at https://ama.com.au/position-statement/ethical-issues-reproductive-medicine-2019
Baird B (2015) Medical abortion in Australia: a short history. Reproductive Health Matters 23, 169–176.
| Medical abortion in Australia: a short history.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26719008PubMed |
Boyd CO (1993) Qualitative approaches in nursing research. Phenomenology: the method. NLN Publications 99–132.
Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G (2019) Thematic Analysis. ‘Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences’. (Ed. P Liamputtong) pp. 843–860. (Springer Singapore: Singapore)
Children by Choice (2020a) How much will an abortion cost? Available at https://www.childrenbychoice.org.au/foryou/abortion/abortioncosts [Verified 24 March 2021]
Children by Choice (2021b) Australian abortion law and practice. Available at https://www.childrenbychoice.org.au/factsandfigures/australianabortionlawandpractice [Verified 22 January 2021]
Children by Choice (2020c) Becoming a medical abortion provider. Available at https://www.childrenbychoice.org.au/forprofessionals/becoming-a-medical-abortion-provider [Verified 24 March 2021]
Coast E, Norris AH, Moore AM, Freeman E (2018) Trajectories of women’s abortion-related care: a conceptual framework. Social Science & Medicine (1982) 200, 199–210.
| Trajectories of women’s abortion-related care: a conceptual framework.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dawson A, Bateson D, Estoesta J, Sullivan E (2016) Towards comprehensive early abortion service delivery in high income countries: insights for improving universal access to abortion in Australia. BMC Health Services Research 16, 612
| Towards comprehensive early abortion service delivery in high income countries: insights for improving universal access to abortion in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27770797PubMed |
Dawson AJ, Nicolls R, Bateson D, Doab A, Estoesta J, Brassil A, Sullivan EA (2017) Medical termination of pregnancy in general practice in Australia: a descriptive-interpretive qualitative study. Reproductive Health 14, 39
| Medical termination of pregnancy in general practice in Australia: a descriptive-interpretive qualitative study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28288649PubMed |
de Moel‐Mandel C, Graham M, Taket A (2019) Snapshot of medication abortion provision in the primary health care setting of regional and rural Victoria. The Australian Journal of Rural Health 27, 237–244.
| Snapshot of medication abortion provision in the primary health care setting of regional and rural Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31070843PubMed |
Deb S, Subasinghe AK, Mazza D (2020) Providing medical abortion in general practice: general practitioner insights and tips for future providers. Australian Journal of General Practice 49, 331–337.
| Providing medical abortion in general practice: general practitioner insights and tips for future providers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32464728PubMed |
Doran FM, Hornibrook J (2016) Barriers around access to abortion experienced by rural women in New South Wales, Australia. Rural and Remote Health 16, 3538
Endler M, Lavelanet A, Cleeve A, Ganatra B, Gomperts R, Gemzell-Danielsson K (2019) Telemedicine for medical abortion: a systematic review. BJOG 126, 1094–1102.
| Telemedicine for medical abortion: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30869829PubMed |
Fix L, Seymour JW, Sandhu MV, Melville C, Mazza D, Thompson T-A (2020) At-home telemedicine for medical abortion in Australia: a qualitative study of patient experiences and recommendations. BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health 46, 172–176.
| At-home telemedicine for medical abortion in Australia: a qualitative study of patient experiences and recommendations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, Rashid S, Redwood S (2013) Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology 13, 117
| Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24047204PubMed |
Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L (2006) How many interviews are enough?: an experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18, 59–82.
| How many interviews are enough?: an experiment with data saturation and variability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Hulme-Chambers A, Clune S, Tomnay J (2018) Medical termination of pregnancy service delivery in the context of decentralization: social and structural influences. International Journal for Equity in Health 17, 172
| Medical termination of pregnancy service delivery in the context of decentralization: social and structural influences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 30463561PubMed |
Hyland P, Raymond EG, Chong E (2018) A direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service in Australia: Retrospective analysis of the first 18 months. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 58, 335–340.
| A direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service in Australia: Retrospective analysis of the first 18 months.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29603139PubMed |
Ireland S, Belton S, Doran F (2020) ‘I didn’t feel judged’: exploring women’s access to telemedicine abortion in rural Australia. Journal of Primary Health Care 12, 49–56.
| ‘I didn’t feel judged’: exploring women’s access to telemedicine abortion in rural Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32223850PubMed |
Keogh L, Croy S, Newton D, Hendron M, Hill S (2019) General practitioner knowledge and practice in relation to unintended pregnancy in the Grampians region of Victoria, Australia. Rural and Remote Health 19, 5156
| General practitioner knowledge and practice in relation to unintended pregnancy in the Grampians region of Victoria, Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31675244PubMed |
LaRoche KJ, Wynn LL, Foster AM (2020) ‘We’ve got rights and yet we don’t have access’: exploring patient experiences accessing medication abortion in Australia. Contraception 101, 256–260.
| ‘We’ve got rights and yet we don’t have access’: exploring patient experiences accessing medication abortion in Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31927029PubMed |
Mazza D, Burton G, Wilson S, Boulton E, Fairweather J, Black KI (2020) Medical abortion. Australian Journal of General Practice 49, 324–330.
| Medical abortion.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32464732PubMed |
MBS Online (2020) COVID-19 Temporary MBS Telehealth Services. Available at http://www.mbsonline.gov.au/internet/mbsonline/publishing.nsf/Content/Factsheet-TempBB [Verified 8 December 2020]
NPS MedicineWise (2015) Mifepristone and misoprostol (MS-2 Step) composite pack: use extended to 63 days’ gestation. Available at https://www.nps.org.au/radar/articles/mifepristone-and-misoprostol-ms-2-step-composite-pack-use-extended-to-63-days-gestation [Verified 9 November 2020]
Newton D, Bayly C, McNamee K, Hardiman A, Bismark M, Webster A, Keogh L (2016a) How do women seeking abortion choose between surgical and medical abortion? Perspectives from abortion service providers. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 56, 523–529.
| How do women seeking abortion choose between surgical and medical abortion? Perspectives from abortion service providers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27530690PubMed |
Newton D, Bayly C, McNamee K, Bismark M, Hardiman A, Webster A, Keogh L (2016b) ‘…a one stop shop in their own community’: medical abortion and the role of general practice. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 56, 648–654.
| ‘…a one stop shop in their own community’: medical abortion and the role of general practice.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27440477PubMed |
Shankar M, Black KI, Goldstone P, Hussainy S, Mazza D, Petersen K, Lucke J, Taft A (2017) Access, equity and costs of induced abortion services in Australia: a cross-sectional study. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 41, 309–314.
| Access, equity and costs of induced abortion services in Australia: a cross-sectional study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28110510PubMed |
South Australian Abortion Action Coalition (2020) Decriminalising abortion in SA. Available at https://saabortionactioncoalition.com/decriminalising-abortion-in-sa/
