Register      Login
Australian Journal of Primary Health Australian Journal of Primary Health Society
The issues influencing community health services and primary health care
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A preliminary investigation of the Partners in Health scale measurement properties in patients with end stage renal disease

Claire Baxter A C , Andrea Morello A , David Smith A , Lynda Norton B and David Bentley B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Flinders Human Behaviour and Health Research Unit, The Margaret Tobin Centre, Flinders University, PO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia.

B Discipline of Health and Exercise Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, SA 5045, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: baxt0057@flinders.edu.au

Australian Journal of Primary Health 23(3) 288-293 https://doi.org/10.1071/PY16095
Submitted: 4 August 2016  Accepted: 3 November 2016   Published: 12 January 2017

Abstract

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is becoming more prevalent in Australia. As a result, strategies to improve quality of life when living with ESRD are becoming increasingly important. The Flinders Program has been developed to help support and increase the self-management capacity of people living with chronic disease. The Partners in Health (PIH) scale is a self-management capacity assessment tool, which is an integral element of the Flinders Program. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the preliminary measurement properties of the PIH scale within the ESRD population. Forty participants took part in the study, which involved survey assessments at baseline and follow up and a semi-structured interview. Results indicated that the PIH scale had good internal reliability (α = 0.85), moderate test-retest reliability (r = 0.33) and face validity in ESRD patients. Areas for improving the instrument or data collection process were identified through qualitative interviews, and implications are discussed specific to ESRD patients.

Additional keywords: self-management.


References

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2013) Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health survey: biomedical results, 2012–13. Available at http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/4727.0.55.003~2012/13~Main%20Features~Chronic%20Kidney%20Disease~113 [Verified 12 August 2015]

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2009) ‘An Overview of Chronic Kidney Disease in Australia 2009.’ (AIHW: Canberra, ACT, Australia)

Battersby MW, Ask A, Reece MW, Markwick MJ, Collins JP (2003) The Partners in Health scale: the development and psychometric properties of a generic assessment scale for chronic condition self–management. Australian Journal of Primary Health 9, 41–52.
The Partners in Health scale: the development and psychometric properties of a generic assessment scale for chronic condition self–management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Battersby M, Harris M, Smith D, Reed R, Woodman R (2015) A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of the Flinders Program of chronic condition management in community health care services. Patient Education and Counseling 98, 1367–1375.
A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of the Flinders Program of chronic condition management in community health care services.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cronbach L (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297–334.
Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kidney Health Australia (2015) Fast facts on CKD in Australia. Available at http://www.kidney.org.au/kidneydisease/fastfactsonckd/tabid/589/default.aspx [Verified 10 September 2015]

Lorig K (1993) Self-management of chronic illness: a model for the future (self care and older adults). Generations 17, 11–14.

Petkov J, Harvey P, Battersby M (2010) The internal consistency and construct validity of the partners in health scale: validation of a patient rated chronic condition self-management measurement. Quality of Life Research: an International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation 19, 1079–1085.
The internal consistency and construct validity of the partners in health scale: validation of a patient rated chronic condition self-management measurement.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Smith D, Harvey P, Lawn S, Harris M, Battersby M (2016) Measuring chronic condition self-management in an Australian community: factor structure of the revised Partners in Health (PIH) scale. Quality of Life Research
Measuring chronic condition self-management in an Australian community: factor structure of the revised Partners in Health (PIH) scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | [Published online early 18 July 2016].

Thomas SD, Hathaway DK, Arheart KL (1992) Face validity. Western Journal of Nursing Research 14, 109–112.
Face validity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK387ovVGqtg%3D%3D&md5=05d894a56e4c6f5d920a9607963a4485CAS |

Walters J, Cameron-Tucker H, Wills K, Schuz N, Scott J, Robinson A, Nelson M, Turner P, Wood-Baker R, Walters H (2013) Effects of telephone health monitoring in community-recruited chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on self-management capacity, quality of life and psychological morbidity: a randomized controlled trial. British Medical Journal 3, 1–10.