Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Abundance, spatial distribution and habitat relationships of echinoderms in the Cabo Verde Archipelago (eastern Atlantic)

Laura Entrambasaguas A , Ángel Pérez-Ruzafa A , Jose A. García-Charton A D , Ben Stobart B and Juan José Bacallado C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Departamento de Ecología e Hidrología, Universidad de Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, E-30100 Murcia, Spain.

B Centro Oceanográfico de Baleares, Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Aptdo. 291, E-07015 Palma de Mallorca, Spain.

C Museo de la Naturaleza y el Hombre, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Islas Canarias, Spain.

D Corresponding author. Email: jcharton@um.es

Marine and Freshwater Research 59(6) 477-488 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF07109
Submitted: 24 April 2007  Accepted: 5 March 2008   Published: 19 June 2008

Abstract

The analysis of spatial variability in distribution and abundance of echinoderms may help in identifying the range of processes that can explain the observed patterns of this important component of benthic communities. The distribution and abundance of the echinoderm assemblage inhabiting the shallow rocky reefs at the Cabo Verde archipelago (where few studies other than descriptive ones have been performed until now) was quantified at three spatial scales (among islands, between locations within islands, and among replicates), at two depth strata, and related to fine-scale variation of habitat structure. Total echinoderm abundance and the abundance of the sea urchins Diadema antillarum and Eucidaris tribuloides, and the holothurian Euapta lappa were heterogeneous at the largest considered scale. Most species and habitat descriptors exhibited spatial variability at finer scales. There were significant relationships between habitat architecture and depth and both assemblage parameters and species abundances. Although the effects of habitat structure were species-specific, the probability of occurrence of Asteroidea, Ophiuroidea and Holothuroidea species was higher in heterogeneous habitats. Meanwhile Echinoidea and Holothuroidea species showed higher correlations to complex habitats. The observed spatial patterns are inferred to reflect behavioural responses to fine-scale microhabitat complexity, as well as broad-scale oceanic variables and recruitment dynamics.

Additional keywords: geographical distribution, habitat structure, multi-scale study, structural complexity.


Acknowledgements

We wish to thank very specially Dr C. Marcos for her support and help. Dr A. Brito provided helpful discussions. Dr L. Moro actively participated in the field sampling operations. Thanks are also due to the crew of the vessel ‘Corvette’ for their essential support during the field work. Dr P. Sánchez-Jerez provided advice with statistical analysis. We greatly thank three anonymous reviewers, whose comments improved the quality of the manuscript. The present study was supported by a University of Murcia Fellowship to L.E. and by funds from the project ‘Macaronesia 2000’ of the Museo de la Naturaleza y el Hombre (Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain).


References

Alves, F. M. A. , Chicharro, L. M. , Serrao, E. , and Abreu, A. D. (2001). Algal cover and sea-urchin spatial distribution at Madeira Island (NE Atlantic). Scientia Marina 65, 383–392.
Bacallado J. J., Moreno E., and Pérez-Ruzafa A. (1984). Echinodermata (Canary Islands). Provisional checklist. In ‘Echinodermata’. (Eds B. F. Keegan and B. O'Connor.) pp. 149–151. (A.A. Balkema: Rotterdam.)

Balch, T. , and Scheibling, R. E. (2000). Temporal and spatial variability in settlement and recruitment of echinoderms in kelp beds and barrens off Nova Scotia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 205, 139–154.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Barry J. P., and Dayton P. K. (1991). Physical heterogeneity and the organization of marine communites. In ‘Ecological Heterogeneity’. (Eds K. Kolasa and S. T. A. Pickett.) pp. 270–320. (Springer-Verlag: New York.)

Bartholomew, A. , Diaz, R. J. , and Cicchetti, G. (2000). New dimensionless indices of structural habitat complexity: predicted and actual effects on a predator’s foraging success. Marine Ecology Progress Series 206, 45–58.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Dumont C. P., Himmelman J. H., and Russell M. P. (2004). Sea urchin mass mortality associated with algal debris from ice scour. In ‘Echinoderms’. (Ed. N. Heinzeller.) pp. 177–182. (Taylor & Francis Group: London.)

Ebert T. A. (1983). Recruitment in Echinoderms. In ‘Echinoderm Studies’. Vol. I. (Eds M. Jangoux and J. M. Lawrence.) pp. 169–203. (Balkelma: Rotterdam.)

Erwin, D. H. (1998). The end and the beginning: recoveries from mass extinctions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13, 344–349.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Hagen N. (1999). Sea urchin outbreaks and epizootic disease as regulating mechanisms in coastal ecosystems. In ‘Biology and Ecology of Shallow Coastal Waters’. Proceedings of the 28th European Marine Biology Symposium Iraklio, Crete. (Eds A. Eleftheriou, A. D. Ansell and C. J. Smith.), pp. 303–308. (Fredensberg, Olsen and Olsen: Denmark.)

Hagen, N. , and Mann, K. (1992). Functional response of the predators American lobster Homarus americanus and Atlantic wolf fish Anarhichas lupus to increasing numbers of the green sea uchin Strongylocentrotus droebachinesis. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 159, 89–112.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Hendler G., Miller J. E., Pawson D. L., and Kier P. M. (1995). ‘Echinoderms of Florida and the Caribbean. Sea stars, Sea Urchins and Allies.’ (Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington, DC.)

Hereu, B. , Zabala, M. , Linares, C. , and Sala, E. (2004). Temporal and spatial variability in settlements of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck) in the NW Mediterranean. Marine Biology 144, 1011–1018.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Kissling D. L., and Taylor G. T. (1977). Habitat factors for reef dwelling ophiuroids in the Florida Keys. Proceedings of the Third International Coral Reef Symposium, Miami 1. pp. 225–231. (University of Miami: Miami.)

Lázaro, C. , Fernandes, M. J. , Santos, A. M. P. , and Oliveira, P. (2005). Seasonal and interannual variability of surface circulation in the Cape Verde region from 8 years of merged T/P and ERS-2 altimeter data. Remote Sensing of Environment 98, 45–82.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | McCoy E. D., and Bell S. S. (1991). Habitat structure: the evolution and diversification of a complex topic. In ‘Habitat Structure: The Physical Arrangement of Objects in Space’. (Eds S. S. Bell, E. D. McCoy and H. R. Mushinsky.) pp. 3–27. (Chapman and Hall: New York.)

McCullagh P., and Nelder J. A. (1989). ‘Generalized Linear Models.’ 2nd edn. (Chapman and Hall: New York.)

Menge, B. A. (1992). Community regulation: under what conditions are bottom-up factors important on rocky shores? Ecology 73, 755–765.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ministério do Ambiente Agricultura y Pescas (2004). Livro branco sobre o estado do ambiente em Cabo Verde. Praia. República de Cabo Verde.

Mitchell-Thomé, R. (1972). Outline of the geology of the Cape Verde Archipelago. International Journal of Earth Sciences 61, 1087–1109.
Morri C., Cattaneo-Vietti R., Sartoni G., and Bianchi C. N. (2000). ‘Shallow epibenthic communities of Ilha do Sal (Cape Verde Archipelago, Eastern Atlantic). Arquipélago, Life and Marine Sciences 2A, 157–165.

Moses, C. S. , Swart, P. K. , Helmle, K. P. , Dodge, R. E. , and Merino, S. E. (2003). Pavements of Siderastrea radians on Cape Verde reefs. Coral Reefs 22, 506.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Pawson D. L. (1978). The echinoderm fauna of Ascension island, South Atlantic Ocean. Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences 2. (Smithsonian Institution Press: Washington DC.) 31 pp.

Pearse, J. S. , and Hines, A. H. (1987). Long-term population dynamics of sea urchins in a central California kelp forest: rare recruitment and rapid decline. Marine Ecology Progress Series 39, 275–283.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Perès J. M. (1982). Zonations. In ‘Marine Ecology’. (Eds O. Kinné and J. Wiley) pp. 9–46. (John Wiley: Chichester, London.)

Pérez-Ruzafa, A. , Entrambasaguas, L. , and Bacallado, J. J. (1999). Fauna de equinodermos (Echinodermata) de los fondos rocosos infralitorales del archipiélago de Cabo Verde. Revista Académica Canaria de las Ciencias XI(3–4), 43–62.
Pérez-Ruzafa A., Entrambasaguas L., Marcos C., Bacallado J. J., and García Charton J. A. (2001). Spatial relationships of the echinoderm fauna of Cabo Verde islands: A multi-scale approach. In ‘Echinoderm Research 2001’. (Eds J. P. Féral and B. David.) pp. 31–39. (Swets and Zeitlinger Publications: Balkema.)

Pfister, C. A. , and Bradbury, A. (1996). Harvesting red sea urchins: recent effects and future predictions. Ecological Applications 6, 298–551.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Rolán E. (1991). La familia Conidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda) en el archipiélago de Cabo Verde (África occidental). PhD Thesis, University of Santiago (Spain).

Ruitton, S. , Francour, P. , and Boudouresque, C. F. (2000). Relationships between algae, benthic herbivorous invertebrates and fishes in rocky sublittoral communities of a temperate sea (Mediterranean). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 50, 217–230.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Stobberup K. A., Ramos V. D. M., and Coelho M. L. (2004). Ecopath model of the Cape Verde coastal ecosystem. In ‘West African Marine Ecosystems: Models and Fisheries Impacts’. Fisheries Centre Research Reports 12(7). (Eds M. L. D. Palomares and D. Pauly.) pp. 39–56. (Fisheries Centre, UBC: Vancouver.)

Strathman R. R. (1978). Larval settlement in echinoderms. In ‘Settlement and Metamorphosis of Marine Invertebrate Larvae’. (Eds F. S. Chia and M. F. Rice.) pp. 235–246. (Elsevier: Amsterdam.)

Tegner, M. J. , and Dayton, P. K. (1981). Population structure, recruitment and mortality of two sea urchins (Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and S. purpuratus) in a kelp forest. Marine Ecology Progress Series 5, 255–268.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Tyler P. A., Young C. M., and Clarke A. (2000). Temperature and pressure tolerances of embryos and larvae of the Antarctic sea urchin Sterechinus neumayeri: potential for deep-sea invasion from high latitudes. Marine Ecology Progress Series 192, 173–180.

Underwood A. J. (1997). ‘Experiments in Ecology: Their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

Underwood, A. J. , and Chapman, M. G. (1996). Scales of spatial patterns of distribution of intertidal invertebrates. Oecologia 107, 212–224.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Young, C. M. , and Chia, F. S. (1982). Factors controlling spatial distribution of the sea cucumber Psolus chitonoides: settling and post-settling behaviour. Marine Biology 69, 195–205.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |