Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Integrating knowledge to inform water quality planning in the Tully–Murray basin, Australia

F. J. Kroon A , C. J. Robinson B D and A. P. Dale C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, PO Box 780, Atherton, Qld 4883, Australia.

B CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, 306 Carmody Road, St Lucia, Qld 4067, Australia.

C Terrain Regional NRM Inc., 88 Rankin Street, Innisfail, PO Box 1756, Innisfail, Qld 4860, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: catherine.robinson@csiro.au

Marine and Freshwater Research 60(11) 1183-1188 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF08349
Submitted: 17 December 2008  Accepted: 3 June 2009   Published: 17 November 2009

Abstract

Decentralised approaches to water governance have emerged as a common approach to tackle complex environmental management issues in Australia and elsewhere. While decentralisation offers hope for a more holistic, integrated and effective approach to environmental planning decisions and solutions, challenges remain to put these ideals into practice. The present paper focuses on a key component of this approach to environmental planning and decision-making – the integration of different types of knowledge used to inform planning goals and the design of water quality management programs. The analysis draws on knowledge integration issues surrounding the water quality improvement plan in the Tully–Murray basin in north-eastern Australia. Here, government and non-government stakeholders are coordinating efforts to assess water quality condition and set management priorities for improving the quality of water entering the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage coastal lagoon. Our analysis of the kinds of knowledge and mechanisms of translation involved highlights three main points. First, the tensions between the uncertainty and bias in different types of knowledge brought to the planning table. Second, the timing of knowledge contributions that affects if and how knowledge contributions can be debated and integrated. Finally, the challenges faced by local collaborative groups to broker the translation and integration of knowledge needed to inform strategic environmental decisions and programs.

Additional keywords: boundary organisations, collaboration, Great Barrier Reef catchments, local knowledge, watershed planning.


Acknowledgements

This work is part of the Coastal Catchment Initiative, Natural Heritage Trust, funded by the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Additional funding was provided through the CSIRO’s Water for a Healthy Country Flagship Program and the Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility. The authors acknowledge Marcus Lane, Rachel Eberhard, Stewart Evans and one anonymous reviewer whose feedback improved earlier versions of the manuscript.


References

Anonymous  (2003). The State of Queensland and Commonwealth of Australia. Reef Water Quality Protection Plan for catchments adjacent to the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area. Report to Queensland Department of Premier and Cabinet, Brisbane.

Armour, J. D. , Hateley, L. R. , and Pitt, G. L. (2009). Catchment modelling of sediment, nitrogen and phosphorus nutrient loads with SedNet/ANNEX in the Tully–Murray basin. Marine and Freshwater Research 60, 1091–1096.
Cash D., Clark W. C., Alcock F., Dickson N., Eckley N., et al. (2002). Credibility, legitimacy and boundaries: Linking research, assessment and decision-making. Working Papers Series RWP02–046. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=372280 [verified 20 September 2009] or doi:10.2139/SSRN.372280

Corburn, J. (2003). Bringing local knowledge into environmental decision making. Journal of Planning Education and Research 22, 420–433.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ferrier R. (2006). Science challenges to support diffuse pollution management in the Great Barrier Reef. Report to the CSIRO Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship, Canberra.

Fischer F. (2000). ‘Citizens, Experts and the Environment.’ (Duke University Press: Durham, NC.)

Forester J. (1989). ‘Planning in the Face of Power.’ (University of California Press: Berkeley, CA.)

Forester J. (1999). ‘The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)

Friedmann J. (1987). ‘Planning in the Public Domain. From Knowledge to Action.’ (Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.)

Furnas M. (2003). ‘Catchments and Corals. Terrestrial Runoff to the Great Barrier Reef.’ (Australian Institute of Marine Science: Townsville, Qld.)

GBRMPA (2008). ‘Water Quality Guidelines for the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park. Draft.’ (Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority: Townsville, Qld.)

Healey P. (1997). ‘Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies.’ (Macmillan: London.)

Healey, P. (2006). Transforming governance: challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space. European Planning Studies 14, 299–320.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Koontz T. M., Steelman T. A., Carmin J., Smith K., Korfmacher C., et al. (2004). ‘Collaborative Environmental Management. What Roles for Government?’ (Resource for the Future: Washington, DC.)

Kroon F. J. (2008). Draft Tully Water Quality Improvement Plan. Report to Terrain Natural Resource Management. Report to the CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems, Atherton, Qld.

Kroon, F. J. (2009). Integrated research to improve water quality in the Great Barrier Reef region. Marine and Freshwater Research 60, i–iii.
Larson S. (2008). What can we learn from combining wellbeing satisfaction with the relative importance of wellbeing contributors? 10th Australian Conference on Quality of Life, 19–20 November 2008, Melbourne.

Margerum, R. D. (2007). Overcoming locally based collaboration constraints. Society & Natural Resources 20, 135–152.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ribot J. C. (2002). ‘Democratic Decentralization of Natural Resources: Institutionalizing Popular Participation.’ (World Resources Institute: Washington, DC.)

Roebeling, P. C. , van Grieken, M. E. , Webster, A. J. , Biggs, J. , and Thorburn, P. (2009). Cost-effective water quality improvement in linked terrestrial and marine ecosystems: a spatial environmental–economic modelling approach. Marine and Freshwater Research 60, 1150–1158.
Robinson C. J., and Munungguritj N. (2001). Sustainable balance: a Yolngu framework for cross-cultural collaborative management. In ‘Working on Country: Indigenous Environmental Management in Australia’. (Eds R. Baker, J. Davies and E. Young.) pp. 92–107. (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)

Robinson, C. J. , Taylor, B. M. , Pearson, L. , O’Donohue, M. , and Harman, B. (2009). A SMART assessment of water quality partnership needs in Great Barrier Reef Catchments. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 16, 84–93.
Sabatier P. A., Focht W., Lubell M., Trachtenberg Z., Vedlitz A., et al. (2005). ‘Swimming Upstream. Collaborative Approaches to Watershed Management.’ (MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.)

Scott J. C. (1998). ‘Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed.’ (Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.)

Wallace, J. , Stewart, L. , Hawdon, A. , Keen, R. , Karim, F. , and Kemei, J. (2009). Flood water quality and marine sediment and nutrient loads from the Tully and Murray catchments in north Queensland, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research 60, 1123–1131.