Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > MF > MF07011
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 58(7)

The distribution and abundance of dictyoceratid sponges in relation to hydrodynamic features: identifying candidates and environmental conditions for sponge aquaculture

R. J. Bannister A B D , R. Brinkman C , C. Wolff C , C. Battershill B C and R. de Nys A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.

B AIMS@JCU Tropical Aquaculture Programme, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia.

C Australian Institute of Marine Science, PMB 3 Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: Raymond.Bannister@jcu.edu.au

Marine and Freshwater Research 58(7) 624-633 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF07011
Submitted: 18 January 2007  Accepted: 16 May 2007   Published: 26 July 2007

Abstract

The distribution and abundance of dictyoceratid sponges was surveyed to a depth of 20 m at eleven locations within the Palm Island Group, Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia. These surveys were related to prevailing hydrodynamic conditions to identify candidates and environmental conditions for sponge aquaculture. Locations were classified as sheltered, intermediate and exposed using quantitative wave exposure and current force models. The species richness of dictyoceratid sponges was high with ten taxa, but the abundance of most species was low with patchy distributions. Two species, Coscinoderma sp. and Rhopaloeides odorabile, were abundant, and detailed surveys of these species were conducted at seven locations representing common habitats within the Palm Island Group. Coscinoderma sp. was present at all locations and although abundances differed significantly across locations, this was not related to hydrodynamic conditions. In contrast, R. odorabile was only present at exposed locations with low abundance. The higher abundance and broad distribution of Coscinoderma sp. supports its selection as an aquaculture candidate. In contrast, R. odorabile was less abundant and was restricted to high-energy environments making aquaculture more problematic. The present study demonstrates the importance of ecological data in the decision-making process for new species aquaculture.

Additional keywords: Coscinoderma sp., Rhopaloeides odorabile.


Acknowledgements

Qualified endorsement for this work was obtained in April 2002 from the Wulgurukaba (Rattlesnake/Herald) and Mambarra (Palm Group) traditional owners. Both groups will be consulted on the development of the work plan for further aquaculture feasibility research. The scope of this survey fell within that of the existing Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority (GBRMPA) research permit G00/506, provided to AIMS for biotechnology research. The present study was financially supported by the Great Barrier Reef Research Foundation and the James Cook University Finfish and Emerging Species Research Advancement Program. Thanks to Nick Paul for his input on statistical analysis.


References

Ayling, A. L. (1981). The role of biological disturbance in temperate subtidal encrusting communities. Ecology 62, 830–847.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Hooper J. N. A., and van Soest R. W. M. (2002). ‘System Porifera: A Guide to the Classification of Sponges.’ (Kluwer Academic: New York.)

Larcombe, P. , Costen, A. , and Woolfe, K. J. (2001). The hydrodynamic and sedimentary setting of nearshore coral reefs, central Great Barrier Reef shelf, Australia: Paluma shoals, a case study. Sedimentology 48, 811–835.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Massel S. R. (1999). ‘Fluid Mechanics for Marine Ecologists.’ (Springer: New York.)

Pile, A. J. , Patterson, M. R. , Savarese, M. , Chernykh, V. I. , and Fialkov, V. A. (1997). Trophic effects of sponge feeding within the Lake Baikal's littoral zone. 2. Sponge abundance, diet, feeding efficiency, and carbon flux. Limnology and Oceanography 42, 178–184.
Queensland Environmental Protection Agency (2006). http://www.epa.qld.gov.au/environmental_management/coast_and_oceans/waves_and_storm_tides/wave_monitoring/ [Accessed 15 July 2006].

Riisgård, H. U. (1998). Filter feeding and plankton dynamics in a Danish fjord: a review of the importance of flow, mixing and density driven circulation. Journal of Environmental Management 53, 195–202.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Schmahl G. P. (1990). Community structure and ecology of sponges associated with four Southern Florida Coral reefs. In ‘New Perspectives in Sponge Biology’. (Ed. K. Rützler.) pp. 376–383. (Smithsonian Institute Press: Washington, DC.)

Starmans, A. , Gutt, J. , and Arntz, W. E. (1999). Mega-epibenthic communities in Arctic and Antarctic shelf areas. Marine Biology 135, 269–280.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Underwood J. (1997). ‘Experiments in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.)

van Soest R. W. M. (1994). Demosponge distribution patterns. In ‘Sponges in Time and Space: Biology, Chemistry, Paleontology’. (Eds R. M. W. van Soest, T. M. G. van Kempen and J-C. Braekman.) pp. 213–223. (A. A. Balkema: Rotterdam.)

Vicente, V. P. (1989). Regional commercial sponge extinctions in the West Indies: Are recent climatic changes responsible? P. S. Z. I. Marine Ecology 10, 179–191.
Wolanski E. (1994). ‘Physical Oceanographic Processes of the Great Barrier Reef.’ (CRC Press, Marine Science Series: Boca Raton, FL.)

Wulff J. (1994). Sponge-feeding by Caribbean angelfishes, trunkfishes, and filefishes. In ‘Sponges in Time and Space: Biology, Chemistry, Paleontology’. (Eds R. M. W. van Soest, T. M. G. van Kempen and J.-C. Braekman.) pp. 265–271. (A. A. Balkema: Rotterdam.)

Wulff, J. (2001). Assessing and monitoring coral reef sponges: Why and how? Bulletin of Marine Science 69, 831–846.