Register      Login
Marine and Freshwater Research Marine and Freshwater Research Society
Advances in the aquatic sciences
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Diversity and depth-related patterns of mobile invertebrates associated with kelp forests

Melinda A. Coleman A B , Elaine Vytopil A , Paris J. Goodsell A C , Bronwyn M. Gillanders A and Sean D. Connell A D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Southern Seas Ecology Laboratories, DP418, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.

B Present address: Centre for Marine Biofouling and Bioinnovation, 501H Biological Sciences Building, University of New South Wales, NSW, 2052, Australia.

C Present address: Centre for Research on Ecological Impacts of Coastal Cities, Marine Ecology Laboratories A11, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: sean.connell@adelaide.edu.au

Marine and Freshwater Research 58(7) 589-595 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF06216
Submitted: 16 November 2006  Accepted: 14 May 2007   Published: 26 July 2007

Abstract

It is remarkable that although the importance of depth is firmly rooted in the discipline of marine ecology, so little is understood about depth-related patterns of invertebrates in kelp forests, particularly in temperate Australia. We tested for the existence of broad scale patterns in depth-related diversity and abundance of mobile invertebrates in kelp holdfasts (Ecklonia radiata) across several spatial scales along 500 km of coastline. There was a greater abundance and richness of common taxa in holdfasts from shallow relative to deep waters. Strikingly, a disproportionately large percentage (60%) of species was unique to holdfasts from shallow reefs, suggesting that shallow environments create conditions that facilitate a rich biodiversity of invertebrate fauna. We conclude that depth-related variation in kelp forests may not be completely idiosyncratic, and coherent research programs of a broader scale and scope may unify subsets of fragmented knowledge that previously provided little insight into general depth-related patterns of invertebrate assemblages.

Additional keywords: broad scale, depth, diversity, Ecklonia radiata, shallow.


Acknowledgements

We thank Meegan Fowler-Walker, Andrew Irving and Travis Elsdon for assistance with fieldwork and logistics. This work was supported by an ARC discovery grant to S. D. Connell and B. M. Gillanders and ARC fellowships to M. A. Coleman and B. M. Gillanders.


References

Anderson, M. J. (2001). A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26, 32–46.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Connell S. D. (2007). Subtidal temperate rocky habitats: habitat heterogeneity at local to continental scales. In ‘Marine Ecology’. (Eds S. D. Connell and B. M. Gillanders) pp. 378–401. (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)

Connell S. D., and Gillanders B. M. (2007). ‘Marine Ecology’. (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)

Cosentino, A. , and Giacobbe, S. (2006). A case study of mollusc and polychaete soft-bottom assemblages submitted to sedimentary instability in the Mediterranean Sea. Marine Ecology 27, 170–183.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Ehrlich P. R. (1988). The loss of diversity. In ‘Biodiversity’. (Eds E. O. Wilson and F. M. Peters.) pp. 21–26. (National Academy of Sciences Press: Washington, DC.)

Ellingsen, K. E. , Clarke, K. R. , Sommerfield, P. J. , and Warwick, R. M. (2005). Taxonomic distinctness as a measure of diversity applied over a large scale: the benthos of the Norwegian continental shelf. Journal of Animal Ecology 74, 1069–1079.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | Underwood A. J. (1997). ‘Experiments in Ecology. Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, MA.)

Underwood A. J., and Petraitis P. S. (1993). Structure of intertidal assemblages in different locations: how can local processes be compared? In ‘Species diversity in ecological communities: historical and geographical perspectives’. (Eds R. E. Ricklefs and D. Schluter.) pp 38–51. (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL.)

Underwood, A. J. , Chapman, M. G. , and Connell, S. D. (2000). Observations in ecology: you can’t make progress on processes without understanding the patterns. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 250, 97–115.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | Winer B. J., Brown D. R., and Michels K. M. (1991). ‘Statistical Principles in Experimental Design.’ (McGraw-Hill: New York, NY.)

Witman J. D., and Dayton P. K. (2001). Rocky subtidal communities. In ‘Marine Community Ecology’. (Eds Bertness M. D., Gaines S. D. and Hay M. E.) pp. 339–366. (Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA.)