Register      Login
Journal of Primary Health Care Journal of Primary Health Care Society
Journal of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Development and validation of PolyScan, an information technology triage tool for older adults with polypharmacy: a healthcare informatics study

Lisheng Liu https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0280-4793 1 2 , Rashmi Alate 3 , Jeff Harrison https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8478-7469 1 *
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

1 School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.

2 Primary, Public and Community Health, MidCentral District, Te Whatu Ora, PO Box 2056, Palmerston North 4440, New Zealand.

3 Data Quality and Health Information Team, MidCentral District, Te Whatu Ora, PO Box 2056, Palmerston North 4440, New Zealand.

* Correspondence to: jeff.harrison@auckland.ac.nz

Handling Editor: Felicity Goodyear-Smith

Journal of Primary Health Care 15(3) 215-223 https://doi.org/10.1071/HC23034
Published: 11 July 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Introduction

Polypharmacy is associated with potentially inappropriate medicine prescribing and avoidable medicine-related harm. Polypharmacy should not be perceived as inherently harmful. Instead, priority should be placed on reducing inappropriate prescribing.

Aim

The study aimed to develop and validate PolyScan, a primary care information technology tool, to triage older adults with polypharmacy who are prescribed potentially inappropriate medicines.

Methods

Twenty-one indicators from a New Zealand criteria of potentially inappropriate medicines to correct for older adults with polypharmacy were developed into a set of implementable definitions. The definitions were applied as algorithmic logic statements used to interrogate hospital and emergency department records and pharmaceutical collection data to classify whether each indicator was present at an individual patient level, and then triage individuals based on the number of indicators met. Validity was evaluated by comparing PolyScan’s accuracy against a manual review of healthcare records for 300 older adults.

Results

PolyScan was successfully implemented as a tool that can be used to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing in older adults with polypharmacy at different levels of aggregation. The tool has utility for individual practitioners delivering patient care, primary care organisations undertaking quality improvement programmes, and policymakers considering system-level interventions for medicines-related safety. During the validity assessment, PolyScan identified nine individuals (3%) with polypharmacy and indicators of potentially inappropriate medicine. Five unique indicators were detected. PolyScan achieved 100% sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values.

Discussion

PolyScan can support clinicians, clinics, and policymakers with allocation of resources, rational medicine campaigns, and identifying individuals prescribed potentially inappropriate medicines for review.

Keywords: aged, health informatics, inappropriate prescribing, medical informatics, pharmaceutical preparations, polypharmacy, primary health care, triage.

References

Durden M, Avery T, Payne R. Polypharmacy and medicines optimization. UK: The King’s Fund; 2013.

Health Quality & Safety Commission New Zealand. Polypharmacy in people aged 65 and over. New Zealand: Health Quality & Safety Commission New Zealand; 2021. Available at https://www.hqsc.govt.nz/our-data/atlas-of-healthcare-variation/polypharmacy-in-people-aged-65-and-over/ [cited 19 March 2023].

Masnoon N, Shakib S, Kalisch-Ellett L, et al. What is polypharmacy? A systematic review of definitions. BMC Geriatr 2017; 17: 230.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Payne RA, Abel GA, Avery AJ, et al. Is polypharmacy always hazardous? A retrospective cohort analysis using linked electronic health records from primary and secondary care. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2014; 77(6): 1073-1082.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Garfinkel D, Mangin D. Feasibility study of a systematic approach for discontinuation of multiple medications in older adults: addressing polypharmacy. Arch Intern Med 2010; 170(18): 1648-1654.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

BPACnz. A practical guide to stopping medicines in older people. New Zealand: BPACnz; 2010. Available at https://bpac.org.nz/bpj/2010/april/stopguide.aspx [cited 20 May 2023].

Ministry of Health. Pharmaceutical collection. New Zealand: Ministry of Health; 2023. Available at https://www.health.govt.nz/nz-health-statistics/national-collections-and-surveys/collections/pharmaceutical-collection [cited 20 May 2023].

Liu L, Harrison J. Development of explicit criteria identifying potentially inappropriate polypharmacy in older adults in New Zealand primary care: a mixed-methods study. J Prim Health Care 2023; 15(1): 38-47.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

Chieng JHC, Hughes L, Stewart A, et al. Introduction of the Pill Pruner to acute medical care: a simple medication guide to control polypharmacy. Australas J Ageing 2015; 34(1): 58-61.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

10  Young A, Tordoff J, Dovey S, et al. Using an electronic decision support tool to reduce inappropriate polypharmacy and optimize medicines: rationale and methods. JMIR Res Protoc 2016; 5(2): e105.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

11  Qureshi K, Veenema T. Disaster triage and chemical decontamination: disaster nursing and emergency preparedness for chemical, biological, and radiological terrorism and other hazards. New York: Springer; 2003.

12  Ministry of Health. Pharmaceutical information database data guide. New Zealand: Ministry of Health; 2006. Available at https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/pharmaceutical-information-database-data-guide [updated 4 August 2021; cited 17 May 2023].

13  World Health Organization. International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems 10th revision. Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2011.

14  Ministry of Health. SNOMED CT New Zealand edition. New Zealand: Ministry of Health; 2022. Available at https://www.health.govt.nz/nz-health-statistics/classification-and-terminology/new-zealand-snomed-ct-national-release-centre/snomed-ct-subsets-and-maps [cited 19 Mar 2023].

15  Bates DW, Kuperman GJ, Wang S, et al. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10(6): 523-530.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

16  Payne TH. Computer decision support systems. Chest 2000; 118(2 Suppl): 47S-52S.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

17  Tuti T, Nzinga J, Njoroge M, et al. A systematic review of electronic audit and feedback: intervention effectiveness and use of behaviour change theory. Implement Sci 2017; 12(1): 61.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

18  Monteiro L, Maricoto T, Solha I, et al. Reducing potentially inappropriate prescriptions for older patients using computerized decision support tools: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21(11): e15385.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

19  Avery AJ, Rodgers S, Cantrill JA, et al. A pharmacist-led information technology intervention for medication errors (PINCER): a multicentre, cluster randomised, controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet 2012; 379(9823): 1310-1319.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

20  Guthrie B, Kavanagh K, Robertson C, et al. Data feedback and behavioural change intervention to improve primary care prescribing safety (EFIPPS): multicentre, three arm, cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2016; 354: i4079.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

21  Dreischulte T, Donnan P, Grant A, et al. Safer prescribing — a trial of education, informatics, and financial incentives. N Engl J Med 2016; 374(11): 1053-1064.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

22  Aronsky D, Jones I, Raines B, et al. An integrated computerized triage system in the emergency department. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2008; 2008: 16-20.
| Google Scholar |

23  Koca A, Polat O, Oğuz AB, et al. Reliability and validity of a new computer-based triage decision support tool: ANKUTRIAGE. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2002; 17: e162.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

24  Health Quality & Safety Commission New Zealand. Atlas of healthcare variation - polypharmacy in people aged 65 and over. New Zealand: Health Quality & Safety Commission New Zealand; 2019. Available at https://public.tableau.com/app/profile/hqi2803/viz/Polypharmacysinglemap/AtlasofhealthcarevariationPolypharmacy?publish=yes [cited 19 March 2023].

25  Gray SL, Marcum ZA, Dublin S, et al. Association between medications acting on the central nervous system and fall-related injuries in community-dwelling older adults: a new user cohort study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2020; 75(5): 1003-1009.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

26  Medsafe. NSAIDs and acute kidney injury. New Zealand: New Zealand Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority; 2013. Available at https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/profs/PUArticles/June2013NSAIDS.htm [cited 19 March 2023].

27  BPACnz. I dream of sleep: managing insomnia in adults - part 2. New Zealand: BPACnz; 2017. Available at https://bpac.org.nz/2017/insomnia-2.aspx [cited 19 March 2023].

28  Narayan SW, Nishtala PS. Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medicine use in older New Zealanders: a population-level study using the updated 2012 Beers criteria. J Eval Clin Pract 2015; 21(4): 633-641.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |

29  Varga Z, Sabzwari SRA, argova V V. Cardiovascular risk of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: an under-recognized public health issue. Cureus 2017; 9(4): e1144.
| Crossref | Google Scholar |