Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Crop responses to subsoil manuring. II. Comparing surface and subsoil manuring in north-eastern Victoria from 2011 to 2012

Jaikirat S. Gill A C , Peter W. Sale A D , Renick R. Peries B and Caixian Tang A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Animal, Plant and Soil Sciences, Centre for Agribiosciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Vic. 3086, Australia.

B Victorian Department of Economic Development, Jobs, Transport and Resources, PO Box 103, Geelong, Vic. 3220, Australia.

C 113 Wigum St, Macleod, Vic. 3085, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: p.sale@latrobe.edu.au

Crop and Pasture Science 70(4) 318-326 https://doi.org/10.1071/CP18116
Submitted: 26 March 2018  Accepted: 11 February 2019   Published: 15 April 2019

Abstract

An on-farm field-experiment was carried out in north-eastern Victoria in 2011 and 2012 to compare the agronomic effectiveness of surface and subsoil manuring on a Chromosol soil with a compacted clay subsoil. Surface manuring involved the surface application of 20 t poultry litter ha–1, whereas subsoil manuring involved deep-banding of the same quantity of litter in 30–40-cm-deep rip-lines, spaced 80 cm apart. Treatments were applied at the start of the first cropping season. The objective of the study was to determine whether surface manuring might produce the large yield responses reported for subsoil manuring. Both manuring treatments increased yields of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) by >2.3 t ha–1 compared with the unamended control in 2011, when spring rainfall was close to the average. However, only subsoil manuring increased wheat yields in 2012, producing an extra 4.7 t ha–1 above the control, in a year with a very dry spring. This yield response suggests that subsoil manuring would be more effective than surface manuring in the second year after treatment in years with a dry finish.

Additional keywords: duplex soil, impermeable dense clay, subsoil constraints.


References

Armstrong RD, Eagle C, Matassa V, Jarwal SD (2007) Application of composted pig bedding on a Vertosol and Sodosol soil. 1. Effect on crop growth and soil water. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 47, 689–699.
Application of composted pig bedding on a Vertosol and Sodosol soil. 1. Effect on crop growth and soil water.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Armstrong RD, Eagle C, Flood R (2015) Improving grain yields on a sodic clay soil in a temperate, medium-rainfall cropping environment. Crop & Pasture Science 66, 492–505.
Improving grain yields on a sodic clay soil in a temperate, medium-rainfall cropping environment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Burk L, Dalgliesh N (2008) ‘Estimating plant available water capacity—a methodology.’ (CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems: Canberra, ACT)

Gill JS, Sale PWG, Tang C (2008) Amelioration of dense sodic subsoil using organic amendments increases wheat yield more than using gypsum in a high rainfall zone of southern Australia. Field Crops Research 107, 265–275.
Amelioration of dense sodic subsoil using organic amendments increases wheat yield more than using gypsum in a high rainfall zone of southern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gill JS, Sale PWG, Peries RR, Tang C (2009) Changes in physical properties and crop root growth in dense sodic subsoil following incorporation of organic amendments. Field Crops Research 114, 137–146.
Changes in physical properties and crop root growth in dense sodic subsoil following incorporation of organic amendments.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gill JS, Clark GJ, Sale PW, Peries RR, Tang C (2012) Deep placement of organic amendments in dense sodic subsoil increases summer fallow efficiency and the use of deep soil water by crops. Plant and Soil 359, 57–69.
Deep placement of organic amendments in dense sodic subsoil increases summer fallow efficiency and the use of deep soil water by crops.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holford ICR, Doyle AD, Leckie CC (1992) Nitrogen response characteristics of wheat protein in relation to yield responses and their interactions with phosphorus. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 969–986.
Nitrogen response characteristics of wheat protein in relation to yield responses and their interactions with phosphorus.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Isbell RF (2002) ‘The Australian Soil Classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Klute A, Dirkson C (1985) Hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils. In ‘Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods’. SSSA Book Series 5.1. (Ed. A Klute) pp. 735–770. (Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA)

Sale PW, Gill JS, Peries RR, Tang C (2019) Crop responses to subsoil manuring. I. Results in south-western Victoria from 2009 to 2012. Crop & Pasture Science 70, 44–54.
Crop responses to subsoil manuring. I. Results in south-western Victoria from 2009 to 2012.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Tang C, Rengel Z, Diatloff E, Gazey C (2003) Responses of wheat and barley to liming on a sandy soil with subsurface acidity. Field Crops Research 80, 235–244.
Responses of wheat and barley to liming on a sandy soil with subsurface acidity.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |