Register      Login
Australian Journal of Botany Australian Journal of Botany Society
Southern hemisphere botanical ecosystems
EDITORIAL

Virtual Issue in Australian Journal of Botany: rare and threatened plant conversation and recovery

Linda Broadhurst A D , David Coates B , Susan Hoebee C , Trevor Edwards C and John Morgan C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Australian National Biodiversity Research, CSIRO National Research Collections Australia. GPO Box 1700 Canberra Australia 2601.

B Department of Parks and Wildlife, Locked Bag 104 Bentley Delivery Centre WA Australia 6983.

C Department of Ecology, Environment and Evolution; La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia 3086.

D Corresponding author. Email: Linda.Broadhurst@csiro.au

Australian Journal of Botany 64(8) 652-653 https://doi.org/10.1071/BTv64n8_ED2
Published: 19 December 2016

Abstract

Virtual Issues consist of previously published papers that are repackaged into an online themed collection. With appropriate marketing, and making them free for a limited time, these issues are a powerful tool that allow all readers to rediscover and access content already published. Release of this Virtual Issue of Australian Journal of Botany was timed to coincide with the 11th Australasian Plant Conservation Conference (APCC11), held on 14–18 November at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Melbourne. For more information, please visit: http://www.publish.csiro.au/bt/content/VirtualIssues.

Introduction

The conservation, management and recovery of rare and threatened species is complex, challenging and requires an understanding of many aspects of a species’ biology. It is also important to understand key threats to population and species persistence, including those that may not be immediately obvious. The highlighted virtual issue brings together papers from previous issues of the Australian Journal of Botany to highlight three important research areas for plant conservation and recovery – genetics, ecology and ex-situ conservation – the virtual issue was developed by the Australian Network for Plant Conservation for its 11th Australasian Plant Conservation Conference held at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Melbourne on 14–18 November 2016.

Genetics

The role that genetics can play in improving species conservation and recovery is well known. Early genetic research was primarily applied to determine levels of genetic diversity and population structure with a view to guiding conservation actions such as prioritising populations for more immediate intervention. Later, genetics research expanded into the exploration of plant reproductive strategies and mating patterns, helping to improve species management through a better understanding of the impacts of inbreeding in small and isolated populations, as well as the scale of pollen and seed dispersal. Genetic analyses have also been used to clarify species boundaries and conservation status, identify cryptic species, and to help prioritise populations for germplasm collection and translocation. The papers (Moran and Hopper 1983; Peters et al. 1990; James and Brown 2000; Elliott et al. 2002) in this section highlight the application of genetics to improve the conservation and recovery of rare Australian plants.

Plant ecology

Demography forms the cornerstone of much of the research undertaken to understand the survival, management and recovery of rare species. Plant population processes – including flowering, seed set, germination, early seedling survival – are crucial life history stages that determine whether population growth rates (r) are stable (r = 0), growing (r > 0) or declining (r < 0). Assessing rare plant demography, often by comparing their performance against common congeners, has typically shown that seed production and viability and germination cues are not necessarily more restrictive in rare species. Instead, seed dispersal and early seedling survival, linked to microsite availability, are often more limited for rare species, with competition a key ecological process that underpins outcomes. The papers in this section (Gilfedder and Kirkpatrick 1994; Osunkoya and Swanborough 2001; Jusaitis et al. 2003; Nield et al. 2009) highlight aspects of early life history dynamics, focusing on the importance of making viable seeds, dispersing those seeds, and the fate of seeds (i.e. germination cues), with emphasis on how management might promote these processes. It is clear that to understand population dynamics, more emphasis on whole of life cycle dynamics is necessary, perhaps using population viability analyses (PVA), to determine where and why population bottlenecks occur. This has rarely been done but the last paper in this section (Nield et al. 2009) provides a good case in point of using PVA modelling to optimise disturbance regimes that advantage rare species.

Ex situ conservation

A fundamental component of conservation and restoration programs is the close link between effective ex situ (off-site) germplasm management and successful species reintroduction. Target 8 of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation aims to conserve 75% of the world’s threatened plant species in ex situ collections with 20% of these being included in recovery or restoration programs. This is encouraging active participation in ex situ conservation targets and acknowledges the need to link these targets to on-ground restoration and species recovery. This selection of papers (Batty et al. 2001; Bunn et al. 2007; Crawford et al. 2007; Cochrane et al. 2007) explores the concepts and practical principles underpinning ex situ conservation relating to the protection of germplasm, particularly for rare and threatened species, and cover the traditional approaches (seed banking) and more biotechnologically challenging areas such as tissue culture and cryopreservation. While optimising seed storage technologies is a focus for ex situ conservation of rare and threatened plants, biotechnology is an important opportunity for species that cannot be stored by seed (i.e. low or nil seed production species; species with recalcitrant seed).

If you have an idea for a virtual issue, the editorial team at Australian Journal of Botany would love to hear from you. Please get in touch at publishing.ajb@csiro.au.



References

Batty AL, Dixon KW, Brundrett M, Sivasithamparam K (2001) Long-term storage of mycorrhizal fungi and seed as a tool for the conservation of endangered Western Australian terrestrial orchids. Australian Journal of Botany 49, 619–628.
Long-term storage of mycorrhizal fungi and seed as a tool for the conservation of endangered Western Australian terrestrial orchids.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bunn E, Turner S, Panaia M, Dixon KW (2007) The contribution of in vitro technology and cryogenic storage to conservation of indigenous plants. Australian Journal of Botany 55, 345–355.
The contribution of in vitro technology and cryogenic storage to conservation of indigenous plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cochrane JA, Crawford AD, Monks LT (2007) The significance of ex situ seed conservation to reintroduction of threatened plants. Australian Journal of Botany 55, 356–361.
The significance of ex situ seed conservation to reintroduction of threatened plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Crawford AD, Steadman KJ, Plummer JA, Cochrane A, Probert RJ (2007) Analysis of seed-bank data confirms suitability of international seed-storage standards for the Australian flora. Australian Journal of Botany 55, 18–29.
Analysis of seed-bank data confirms suitability of international seed-storage standards for the Australian flora.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Elliott CP, Yates CJ, Ladd PG, Coates DJ (2002) Morphometric, genetic and ecological studies clarify the conservation status of a rare Acacia in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 50, 63–74.
Morphometric, genetic and ecological studies clarify the conservation status of a rare Acacia in Western Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Gilfedder L, Kirkpatrick JB (1994) Genecological variation in the germination, growth and morphology of four populations of a Tasmanian endangered perennial daisy, Leucochrysum albicans. Australian Journal of Botany 42, 431–440.
Genecological variation in the germination, growth and morphology of four populations of a Tasmanian endangered perennial daisy, Leucochrysum albicans.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

James EA, Brown AJ (2000) Morphological and genetic variation in the endangered Victorian endemic grass Agrostis adamsonii Vickery (Poaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 48, 383–395.
Morphological and genetic variation in the endangered Victorian endemic grass Agrostis adamsonii Vickery (Poaceae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Jusaitis M, Sorensen B, Polomka L (2003) Reproductive biology of the endangered Brachycome muelleri (Asteraceae), an endemic herb of Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 51, 179–188.
Reproductive biology of the endangered Brachycome muelleri (Asteraceae), an endemic herb of Eyre Peninsula, South Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moran GF, Hopper SD (1983) Genetic diversity and the insular population structure of the rare granite rock species, Eucalyptus caesia Benth. Australian Journal of Botany 31, 161–172.
Genetic diversity and the insular population structure of the rare granite rock species, Eucalyptus caesia Benth.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Nield AP, Ladd PG, Yates CJ (2009) Reproductive biology, post-fire succession dynamics and population viability analysis of the critically endangered Western Australian shrub Calytrix breviseta subsp. breviseta (Myrtaceae). Australian Journal of Botany 57, 451–464.
Reproductive biology, post-fire succession dynamics and population viability analysis of the critically endangered Western Australian shrub Calytrix breviseta subsp. breviseta (Myrtaceae).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Osunkoya OO, Swanborough PW (2001) Reproductive and ecophysiological attributes of the rare Gardenia actinocarpa (Rubiaceae) compared with its common co-occurring congener, G. ovularis. Australian Journal of Botany 49, 471–478.
Reproductive and ecophysiological attributes of the rare Gardenia actinocarpa (Rubiaceae) compared with its common co-occurring congener, G. ovularis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Peters GB, Lonie JS, Moran GF (1990) The breeding system, genetic diversity and pollen sterility in Eucalyptus pulverulenta, a rare species with small disjunct populations. Australian Journal of Botany 38, 559–570.
The breeding system, genetic diversity and pollen sterility in Eucalyptus pulverulenta, a rare species with small disjunct populations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |