Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Response to phosphorus fertilizer compared under grazing and mowing

JWD Cayley and MC Hannah

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46(8) 1601 - 1619
Published: 1995

Abstract

The response to phosphatic fertilizer of a pasture based on perennial ryegrass, subterranean clover and phalaris was assessed over 4 years. The pasture was established on a previously unfertilized area. Single superphosphate was applied at five rates. In addition there was an unfertilized treatment. The highest rate of fertilizer, expressed as elemental phosphorus (P), was reduced from 100 kg/ha in years 1 and 2 to 60 and 40 kg/ha in years 3 and 4 respectively. Each year total pasture drymatter (DM) production was measured during a 6-month growing season from early winter to late spring under four systems of defoliation: mown monthly (MI), mown every 2 months (M2), mown every 3 months (M3) or set stocked with 1 year old sheep (G). Grazed plots were stocked at 10, 14 or 18 sheep/ha in 3 of the years, and at 8.75, 12.25 or 15.75 sheep/ha during the remaining year. The production of mown pasture generally decreased with increasing frequency of cutting, and was always less than the production of grazed pasture. Mean values for MI, M2, M3 and G were 2.85, 4.35, 5.44 and 6.86 t DM/ha respectively. The absolute and marginal responses to fertilizer (kg DM/kgP) were always greater for the grazed treatments. This suggests that data from mowing trials seriously underestimate the fertilizer response of grazed systems. The amount of fertilizer required to reach a given proportion of potential yield response did not differ between the systems in the first 3 years, but in year 4, more fertilizer was required by the grazed system to reach a given proportion of potential yield (P < 0.01. Strategies for correcting the response curves of the mown treatments are considered.

Keywords: pasture; phosphorus; grazing; mowing

https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9951601

© CSIRO 1995

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions