Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Curation of wheat maps to improve map accuracy and QTL detection

A. Lehmensiek A D , P. J. Eckermann B , A. P. Verbyla B , R. Appels C , M. W. Sutherland A and G. E. Daggard A
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Centre for Systems Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia.

B BiometricsSA, University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.

C Molecular Plant Breeding CRC, Department of Agriculture, Murdoch University, Western Australia Locked Bag 4, Bentley Delivery Centre, WA 6983, Australia.

D Corresponding author. Email: lehmensi@usq.edu.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56(12) 1347-1354 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR05126
Submitted: 15 April 2005  Accepted: 2 September 2005   Published: 15 December 2005

Abstract

Three Australian doubled haploid populations were used to illustrate the importance of map curation in order to improve the quality of linkage maps and quantative trait locus (QTL) detection. The maps were refined and improved by re-examining the order of markers, inspection of the genetic maps in relation to a consensus map, editing the marker data for double crossovers, and determining estimated recombination fractions for all pairs of markers. The re-ordering of markers and replacing genotypes at double crossovers with missing values resulted in an overall decrease in the length of the maps. Fewer apparent genotyping errors, associated with the presence of double recombinants, were identified with restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) than with other types of markers used in this study. The complications that translocations may cause in the ordering of markers and subsequent QTL analysis were investigated. QTL analysis using both the original and revised maps indicated that QTL peaks were more sharply located or had improved log-likelihood (LOD) scores in the revised maps. An accurate indication of the QTL peak and a significant LOD score are both essential for the identification of markers suitable for marker-assisted selection. Recommendations are provided for the improvement of the quality of linkage maps.

Additional keywords: linkage map revision, locus order, double recombinants, recombination fractions, translocation, doubled haploid lines.


Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Grain Research and Development Corporation for funding of this project through the Australian Winter Cereals Molecular Marker Program. We also thank all the research groups that have contributed towards the maps, and Lynette Rampling (CSIRO Plant Industry, Canberra) for providing us with DNA for the populations.


References


Appels R (2003) A consensus molecular genetic map for wheat – a cooperative international effort. ‘Proceedings of the 10th International Wheat Genetics Symposium’. Paestum, Italy. (Ed. NE Progna ) pp. 211–214.


Asíns MJ (2002) Present and future of quantitative trait locus analysis in plant breeding. Plant Breeding 121, 281–291.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Burr B, Burr FA (1991) Recombinant inbreds for molecular mapping in maize: theoretical and practical considerations. Trends in Genetics 7, 55–60.
PubMed |
open url image1

Chalmers KJ, Campbell AW, Kretschmer J, Karakousis A, Henschke PH , et al. (2001) Construction of three linkage maps in bread wheat, Triticum aestivum. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 1089–1119.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dodds KG, Ball R, Djorovic N, Carson SD (2004) The effect of an imprecise map on interval mapping QTLs. Genetical Research 84, 47–55.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Ellis THN (1997) Neighbour mapping as a method for ordering genetic markers. Genetical Research 69, 35–43.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Friebe B, Jiang J, Raupp WJ, McIntosh RA, Gill BS (1996) Characterization of wheat-alien translocations conferring resistance to diseases and pests: current status. Euphytica 91, 59–87. open url image1

Gupta PK, Varshney RK, Sharma PC, Ramesh B (1999) Molecular markers and their application in wheat breeding. Plant Breeding 118, 369–390.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hackett CA, Broadfoot LB (2003) Effects of genotyping errors, missing values and segregation distortion in molecular marker data on the construction of linkage maps. Heredity 90, 33–38.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Hansen M, Kraft T, Christiansson M, Nilsson N-O (1999) Evaluation of AFLP in Beta. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98, 845–852.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hayden MJ, Khatkar S, Sharp PJ (2001) Targetting microsatellites (SSRs) in genetic linkage maps of bread wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 1143–1152.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Jansen J, de Jong AG, van Ooijen JW (2001) Constructing dense genetic linkage maps. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102, 1113–1122.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kammholz SJ, Campbell AW, Sutherland MW, Hollamby GJ, Martin PJ, Eastwood RF, Barclay I, Wilson RE, Brennan PS, Sheppard JA (2001) Establishment and characterisation of wheat genetic mapping populations. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 1079–1088.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Leonova IN, Röder MS, Budashkina EB, Kalinina NP, Salina E (2002) Molecular analysis of leaf rust-resistance introgression lines obtained by crossing of hexaploid wheat Triticum aestivum with tetraploid wheat Triticum timopheevii. Russian Journal of Genetics 38, 1397–1403.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Manly KF, Cudmore RH, Meer JM (2001) Map Manager QTX, cross-platform software for genetic mapping. Mammalian Genome 12, 930–932.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Mester DI, Ronin YI, Hu Y, Peng J, Nevo E, Korol AB (2003) Efficient multipoint mapping: making use of dominant repulsion-phase markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107, 1102–1112.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Pestsova E, Ganal MW, Röder MS (2000) Isolation and mapping of microsatellite markers specific for the D genome of bread wheat. Genome 43, 689–697.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Röder MS, Korzun V, Wendehake K, Plaschke J, Tixier M-H, Leroy P, Ganal MW (1998) A microsatellite map of wheat. Genetics 149, 2007–2013.
PubMed |
open url image1

Ruiz C, Asíns MJ (2003) Comparison between Poncirus and Citrus genetic linkage maps. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106, 826–836.
PubMed |
open url image1

Somers DJ, Isaac P, Edwards K (2004) A high-density microsatellite consensus map for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 109, 1105–1114.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Song QJ, Fickus EW, Cregan PB (2002) Characterization of trinucleotide SSR motifs in wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 104, 286–293.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Verbyla AP, Eckermann PJ, Thompson R, Cullis BR (2003) The analysis of quantitative trait loci in multi-environmental trials using a multiplicative mixed model. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 54, 1395–1408.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Voorrips RE (2002) MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. The Journal of Heredity 93, 77–78.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Wu J, Jenkins J, Zhu J, McCarty J, Watson C (2003) Monte Carlo simulations on marker grouping and ordering. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107, 568–573.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1