Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Keratin gene expression in Merino sheep with divergent wool growth

M. Bray A , D. K. Revell A , C. S. Bawden B and P. I. Hynd A C
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Discipline of Animal Science, The University of Adelaide, Roseworthy Campus, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.

B SARDI Livestock Systems, Roseworthy Campus, Roseworthy, SA 5371, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: philip.hynd@adelaide.edu.au

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56(3) 203-210 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR03253
Submitted: 3 December 2003  Accepted: 27 January 2004   Published: 23 March 2005

Abstract

South Australian Merino sheep were selected on the basis of high or low estimated breeding values (EBV) for wool growth rate (W), but with similar bodyweight, follicle density, and mean fibre diameter. Differences in the level of expression of keratin genes were examined in the skin of these sheep to test the hypothesis that divergence in EBV for wool growth is related to the production of wool proteins differing in sulfur (S) content. Further, it was proposed that this differential gene expression would be most pronounced when the supply of S amino acids to the animal was increased. Sheep selected for high EBV (+W) produced more wool per day than low EBV sheep (–W) (on average 32.5 v. 17.7 g/day clean wool, respectively; P < 0.05) but the S content of the wool did not differ between selection groups (2.77% v. 2.87% S, respectively; P = 0.2). Expression of keratin genes including keratin-associated protein KAP 2 (a high S gene), KAP 4 (an ultra-high S gene), KAP 6 (a high glycine/tyrosine gene), and the intermediate filament gene K 2.10, did not differ significantly between +W and –W groups. KAP 2 and K 2.10 each accounted for approximately 5% of the variation in wool growth rate (WGR) but expression of none of the genes examined was significantly related to the S content of the fibre produced. This suggests that differential keratin gene expression was not the source of genetic divergence in WGR. Instead the latter likely reflects a combination of differential cellular rate and growth processes (e.g. rate of bulb cell production, hypertrophy of cortical cells), differences in the relative production of inner root sheath and fibre from the follicle bulb cell population, or differential nutrient uptake into the follicle.

Additional keywords: follicle, sulfur.


Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the CRC for Premium Quality Wool. M. Bray was a recipient of an Australian Post-Graduate Award and a top-up scholarship from the CRC for Premium Quality Wool.


References


Bennett JW (1973) Regional body surface area of sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, UK 81, 429–432. open url image1

Bray M (2002) Regulation of wool and body growth: nutritional and molecular approaches. PhD thesis, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S. Aust.

Chapman RE, Gemmell RT (1973) An ultrastructural autoradiographic study of the incorporation of [35S]cystine in the wool fibre cortex. Journal of Cell Science 13, 811–819.
PubMed |
open url image1

Chomczynski P, Sacchi N (1987) Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate–phenol–chloroform extraction. Analytical Biochemistry 162, 156–159.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Downes AM, Lyne AG, Clarke WH (1962) Radioautographic studies of the incorporation of [35S] cystine into wool. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 15, 713–719. open url image1

Fratini A, Powell BC, Hynd PI, Keough RA, Rogers GE (1994) Dietary cysteine regulates the levels of mRNAs encoding a family of cysteine-rich proteins in wool. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 102, 178–185.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Fratini A, Powell BC, Rogers GE (1993) Sequence, expression, and evolutionary conservation of a gene encoding a glycine/tyrosine-rich keratin-associated protein of hair. Journal of Biological Chemistry 268, 4511–4518.
PubMed |
open url image1

Genstat (2000). ‘Genstat Release 4.2.’ 5th edn . (Lawes Agricultural Trust: Rothamsted Experimental Station, UK)

Gillespie JM, Reis PJ (1966) The dietary-regulated biosynthesis of high-sulphur wool proteins. The Biochemical Journal 98, 669–677.
PubMed |
open url image1

Gilmour AR, Cullis BR, Welham SJ, Thompson R (1998) ASREML Biometric Bulletin No. 3. NSW Agriculture, Orange, NSW.

Gonzalez IL, Gorski JL, Campen TJ, Dorney DJ, Erickson JM, Sylvester JE, Schmickel RD (1985) Variation among human 28S ribosomal RNA genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 82, 7666–7670.
PubMed |
open url image1

Harris PM, Lee J, Gurnsey MP, Dellow DW, Sinclair BR (1993) Measurement of blood flow and metabolite uptake by the skin of fleeceweight-selected and control Romney rams. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44, 255–264.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Holle SA, Harris PM, Davies AS, Birtles MJ (1994) Wool follicle morphology and cell proliferation in New Zealand Romney sheep: a seasonal comparison of fleeceweight-selected and control rams. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 769–782.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Hough GM, Williams AJ, McDowell GH, Annison EF (1988) Blood metabolites in ewes selectively bred for high or low clean fleece weights: possible use for selection of superior animals. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 17, 422. open url image1

Hynd PI (1989) Factors influencing cellular events in the wool follicle. ‘The biology of wool and hair’. (Eds GE Rogers, PJ Reis, KA Ward, RC Marshall) pp. 169–184. (Chapman and Hall: London; New York)

Hynd PI, Penno NM, Yamin M (2000) Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy for the measurement of the sulphur content of Merino wool. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 13, 185. open url image1

Langlands JP, Wheeler JL (1968) The dyebanding and tattooed patch procedures for estimating wool production and obtaining samples for the measurement of fibre diameter. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 8, 265–269. open url image1

Mata G, Masters DG, Buscall D, Street K, Schlink AC (1995) Responses in wool growth, liveweight, glutathione and amino acids, in Merino wethers fed increasing amounts of methionine protected from degradation in the rumen. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 1189–1204.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Nattrass GS (2000) Molecular and functional characterisation of a system ASC-like neutral amino acid transporter expressed in the wool follicle. PhD thesis, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S. Aust.

Piper LR, Dolling CHS (1966) Variation in the sulphur content of wool of Merino sheep associated with genetic differences in wool-producing capacity. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 19, 1179–1182. open url image1

Piper LR, Dolling CHS (1969) Efficiency of conversion of food to wool V. Comparison of the apparent digestive ability of sheep selected for high clean wool weight with that of sheep from a random control group. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 20, 579–587.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Powell B, Crocker L, Rogers G (1992) Hair follicle differentiation: expression, structure and evolutionary conservation of the hair type II keratin intermediate filament gene family. Development 114, 417–433.
PubMed |
open url image1

Reis PJ, Schinckel PG (1963) Some effects of sulphur-containing amino acids on the growth and composition of wool. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 16, 218–230. open url image1

Reis PJ, Schinckel PG (1964) The growth and composition of wool; II. The effect of casein, gelatin and sulphur-containing amino acids given per abomasum. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 17, 532–547. open url image1

Reis PJ, Tunks DA, Sharry LF (1989) Incorporation of abomasal and intravenous doses of [35S]cystine and [35S]methionine into wool. Journal of Agricultural Science 112, 313–319. open url image1

Reis PJ, Tunks DA, Williams OB, Williams AJ (1967) A relationship between sulphur content of wool and wool production by Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 20, 153–163.
PubMed |
open url image1

Sambrook, J , Fritsch, EF ,  and  Maniatis, T (1989). ‘Molecular cloning—a laboratory manual.’ 2nd edn . (Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory Press: Long Is., NY)

SAS/STAT (2001). ‘User’s guide, Version 8.’ (SAS Institute Inc.: Cary, NC)

Scobie DR, Young SR (2000) The relationship between wool follicle density and fibre diameter is curvilinear. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 60, 162–165. open url image1

Stephenson RGA, Suter GR, Howitt CJ (1991) Wool growth responses to DL-methionine administration and factors affecting the value of supplementation. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 31, 471–477. open url image1

Sun YX, Lee J, Harris PM, Sinclair BR, Shelton ID, Blair HT, McCutcheon SN (1994) Nitrogen and sulfur metabolism and plasma thyroid hormone concentrations in fleeceweight-selected and control Romney sheep at two ambient temperatures. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 45, 339–354.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Williams AJ (1979) Speculations on the biological mechanisms responsible for genetic variation in the rate of wool growth. ‘Physiological and environmental limitations to wool growth’. (Eds JL Black, PJ Reis, KA Ward, RC Marshall) pp. 337–354. (The University of New England Publishing Unit: Leura, NSW)

Williams AJ (1984) Early evidence of a difference in wool producing abilities. Proceedings of the Australian Society of Animal Production 15, 770. open url image1

Williams AJ (1995) Some comparative studies of sulfate metabolism in Merino sheep genetically different in wool production. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 46, 415–427.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Williams AJ, Leng RA, Stephenson SK (1972) Metabolism of cystine by Merino sheep genetically different in wool production. 1. Comparison of the entry rates of cystine in sheep from flocks selectively bred for high and low fleece weight. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 25, 1259–1268.
PubMed |
open url image1

Williams AJ, Winston RJ (1987) A study of the characteristics of wool follicle and fibre in Merino sheep genetically different in wool production. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 38, 743–755.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Wilson N (1995) Amino acid uptake into wool follicles. Honours thesis, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, S. Aust.

Wilson PA, Short BF (1979) Cell proliferation and cortical cell production in relation to wool growth. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 32, 317–327.
PubMed |
open url image1