Modelling the interception of photosynthetically active radiation by evergreen subtropical hedgerows
Trevor Olesen A B , Stephen Morris A and Lisa McFadyen AA NSW Department of Primary Industries, Centre for Tropical Horticulture, PO Box 72, Alstonville, NSW 2477, Australia.
B Corresponding author. Email: trevor.olesen@dpi.nsw.gov.au
Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58(3) 215-223 https://doi.org/10.1071/AR06110
Submitted: 7 April 2006 Accepted: 17 November 2006 Published: 16 March 2007
Abstract
Horticultural tree crop yields tend to be linearly correlated with the percentage of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) intercepted by the canopies, at least for part of the PAR interception range. Models of PAR interception by hedgerows have been used in the design of orchards for temperate tree crops, especially apples, but not for subtropical tree crops, such as lychee and macadamia. Subtropical crops need special consideration because of the latitudes at which they are grown, the specific shapes and dimensions of the hedgerows, and the evergreen habit, which requires an understanding of the entire annual cycle.
We present outputs from a PAR interception model for solid rectangular and tapered hedgerows, based on a model of irradiation beneath blue skies. Annual PAR interception tends to decline as row orientation rotates from north–south to east–west, but with some exceptions for particular tree geometries, and declines slightly with decreasing latitude.
Daily PAR interception is also affected by row orientation, with little seasonal variation for north–south rows but large fluctuations for east–west rows, including very high interception in winter and low interception in summer.
Row orientation and tree shape greatly affect the distribution of PAR over the surface of the canopy. For example, the side faces of evenly spaced, symmetrical, identical north–south hedgerows are equally irradiated throughout the year, but there can be large seasonal differences in the relative irradiance of the north and south faces of the same hedgerows aligned east–west.
The solid tapered hedgerow model tended to overestimate measured PAR interception by ~6% overall, but the percent overestimation seemed to vary with PAR interception, being greater at lower levels of PAR interception.
A curvilinear relationship was found between the yield of macadamia in the Northern Rivers area of NSW in 1997 and the measured PAR intercepted by the trees, with an explained variance of 50%. Maximum yield occurred at ~86% PAR interception. Using modelled PAR interception the explained variance of the yield was 34%.
Model estimates of PAR interception were close to those measured and might be used to address a range of physiological questions concerning the canopy development of subtropical hedgerows.
Additional keywords: canopy dimensions, macadamia, orchard design, PAR interception, yield.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Daryl Firth, Angela McPhan, Russell Priddle, and Ian Purdue for technical support, and the Australian Macadamia Society and Horticulture Australia Limited for partially funding the work.
Byers RE,
Carbaugh DH,
Presley CN, Wolf TK
(1991) The influence of low light on apple fruit abscission. Journal of Horticultural Science 66, 7–17.
Corelli-Grappadelli L,
Ravaglia G, Asirelli A
(1996) Shoot type and light exposure influence carbon partitioning in peach cv. Elegant Lady. Journal of Horticultural Science 71, 533–543.
Flore JA, Layne DR
(1990) The influence of tree shape and spacing on light interception and yield in sour cherry (Prunus cerasus cv. Montmorency). Acta Horticulturae 285, 91–96.
Friday JB, Fownes JH
(2001) A simulation model for hedgerow light interception and growth. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 108, 29–43.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
George AP,
Nissen RJ,
Collins RJ, Rasmussen TS
(1996) Effects of shoot variables and canopy position on fruit set, fruit quality and starch reserves of persimmon (Diospyros kaki L.) in subtropical Australia. Journal of Horticultural Science 71, 217–226.
Hampson CR,
Azarenko AN, Potter JR
(1996) Photosynthetic rate, flowering, and yield component alteration in hazelnut in response to different light environments. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 121, 1103–1111.
Hu GB,
Chen DC,
Li P,
Ouyang R,
Gao FF,
Wang HC, Dong J
(2001) Effects of bagging on fruit coloration and phenylalanine ammonia lyase and polyphenol oxidase in ‘Feizixiao’ litchi. Acta Horticulturae 558, 273–278.
Jackson JE
(1970) Aspects of light climate within apple orchards. Journal of Applied Ecology 7, 207–216.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jackson JE
(1980) Light interception and utilization by orchard systems. Horticultural Reviews 2, 208–267.
Jackson JE, Palmer JW
(1972) Interception of light by model hedgerow orchards in relation to latitude, time of year and hedgerow configuration and orientation. Journal of Applied Ecology 9, 341–357.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Jackson JE, Palmer JW
(1980) A computer model study of light interception by orchards in relation to mechanised harvesting and management. Scientia Horticulturae 13, 1–7.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Khemira H,
Lombard PB,
Sugar D, Azarenko AN
(1993) Hedgerow orientation affects canopy exposure, flowering, and fruiting of ‘Anjou’ pear trees. HortScience 28, 984–987.
Mayer D, Stephenson R
(2006) Macadamia crop forecasting—report on forecasts for 2006. Australian Macadamia Society Ltd News Bulletin 33(2), 44–46.
McFadyen L,
Morris SG,
Oldham MA,
Huett DO,
Meyers NM,
Wood J, McConchie C
(2004) The relationship between orchard crowding, light interception, and productivity in macadamia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 1029–1038.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Medlyn B,
Barrett D,
Landsberg J,
Sands P, Clement R
(2003) Conversion of canopy intercepted radiation to photosynthate: review of modelling approaches for regional scales. Functional Plant Biology 30, 153–169.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Olesen T,
Menzel CM,
Wiltshire N, McConchie CA
(2002) Flowering and shoot elongation of lychee in eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 977–983.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Palmer JW,
Wünsche JN,
Meland M, Hann A
(2002) Annual dry-matter production by three apple cultivars at four within-row spacings in New Zealand. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology 77, 712–717.
Ryugo K,
Marangoni B, Ramos DE
(1980) Light intensity and fruiting effects on carbohydrate contents, spur development, and return bloom of ‘Hartley’ walnut. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 105, 223–227.
Spencer JW
(1971) Fourier series representation of the position of the sun. Search 2, 172.
Stanhill G, Fuchs M
(1977) The relative flux density of photosynthetically active radiation. Journal of Applied Ecology 14, 317–322.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Szeicz G
(1974) Solar radiation for plant growth. Journal of Applied Ecology 11, 617–636.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Tomer E,
Zipori I,
Goren M,
Shooker S,
Ripa M, Foux Y
(2001) Delaying the ripening of ‘Mauritius’ litchi fruit (preliminary results). Acta Horticulturae 558, 315–317.
Tyas JA,
Hofman PJ,
Underhill SJR, Bell KL
(1998) Fruit canopy position and bagging affect yield and quantity of ‘Tai So’ lychee. Scientia Horticulturae 72, 203–213.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Warrington IJ,
Stanley CJ,
Tustin DS,
Hirst PM, Cashmore WM
(1996) Light transmission, yield distribution, and fruit quality in six tree canopy forms of ‘Granny Smith’ apple. Journal of Tree Fruit Production 1, 27–54.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Wünsche JN, Lakso AN
(2000) The relationship between leaf area and light interception by spur and extension shoot leaves and apple orchard productivity. HortScience 35, 1202–1206.
