Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH FRONT

Designing a grazing-system experiment for variable native pastures and flexible lamb-production systems

W. B. Badgery A E , D. Mitchell A , G. D. Millar A , K. Broadfoot A , D. L. Michalk B , P. Cranney C and W. Brown D
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A NSW Department of Primary Industries, Orange Agricultural Institute, 1447 Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.

B Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation, PO Box 883, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.

C Central Tablelands Local Land Services, Orange Agricultural Institute, 1447 Forest Road, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.

D Grazing Management Analysis, Orange, NSW 2800, Australia.

E Corresponding author. Email: warwick.badgery@dpi.nsw.gov.au

Animal Production Science 57(9) 1785-1798 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15856
Submitted: 8 December 2015  Accepted: 21 May 2016   Published: 24 May 2017

Abstract

Grazing-system experiments address complex interactions among animals, pastures, soils, climate and management. As part of the national EverGraze program, a grazing-system experiment was designed to determine how the intensity of grazing management, from continuous grazing (P01) to flexible 4- and 20-paddock rotational systems (P04 and P20), influences the profitability and sustainability of a Merino ewe, terminal sire, lamb production system grazed on heterogeneous native pastures. When implementing such an experiment, it is important to understand and characterise landscape variability, and include this in the design of the experiment. A second challenge for grazing-system research is to operate experimental systems with sufficient flexibility to adequately represent commercial production systems and maintain even utilisation across treatments. The present paper addresses the following two issues: (1) the process used to characterise the potential productivity of variable native pastures and the results of this characterisation; and (2) the development of flexible systems that adequately represent commercial production within an experiment. This was undertaken with input from a project-steering committee called the EverGraze Regional Group, comprising producers, extension staff and private consultants. Prior to the commencement, the site was mapped into three production zones, namely, high (HPZ), medium (MPZ) and low (LPZ), by visually estimating green herbage mass in late spring and marking boundaries between zones with a GPS. The production zones represented differences in soil properties (gravel, pH and available P) and pasture composition, and were used to balance potential production among plots within the same replication. Grazing-system options were evaluated using the sustainable grazing systems pasture model to help choose an appropriate starting stocking rate. The initial stocking rate chosen for the spring-lambing systems was 5.4 ewes/ha. The modelling predicted large variations in feed availability and quality over summer among years; flexible management criteria were therefore developed, including variable sale time for lambs, to utilise the greater feed supply in better seasons. Minimum-pasture benchmarks (>0.8 t DM/ha standing herbage mass and >80% ground cover) and variable green herbage-mass targets were designed to sustain high levels of livestock production and prevent pasture degradation. Criteria for adjusting ewe numbers were developed, but were constrained to pre-joining (March), scanning (July) and post-weaning (December), being consistent with commercial practices. The experiment incorporated flexible management rules as these were considered integral to the successful management of commercial grazing systems.

Additional keywords: grazing management, management, native pasture, sheep production.


References

Andrew MH, Lodge GM (2003) The sustainable grazing systems national experiment. 1. Introduction and methods. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 695–709.
The sustainable grazing systems national experiment. 1. Introduction and methods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Arnold G (1962) Effects of pasture maturity on the diet of sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 13, 701–706.
Effects of pasture maturity on the diet of sheep.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Auld BA, Menz KM, Tisdell CA (1987) ‘Weed control economics.’ (Academic Press Inc.: London)

Badgery WB, Kemp DR, Michalk DL, King WM (2008) Studies of competition between Nassella trichotoma (Nees) Hack. ex Arechav. (serrated tussock) and native pastures. 2. Seedling responses. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 237–246.
Studies of competition between Nassella trichotoma (Nees) Hack. ex Arechav. (serrated tussock) and native pastures. 2. Seedling responses.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Badgery WB, Millar GD, Mitchell D, Michalk DL (2011) Phosphorus gradient due to landscape in variable native pastures. In ‘Proceedings of the IXth international rangeland congress’, Rosario, Argentina. (Eds SR Feldman, GE Oliva, MB Sacido) pp. 309. (IX International Rangeland Congress: Rosario, Argentina)

Badgery W, Sargeant K, Friend M, Glyde S, Sanford P, Behrendt R, Mitchell M, Murphy S, Avery A (2015) EverGraze: a partnership between researchers, farmers and advisors to deliver effective grassland management. In ‘Sustainable use of grassland resources for forage production, biodiversity and environmental protection. Proceedings of the 23rd international grassland congress, keynote lectures’. (Eds D Vijay, MK Srivastava, CK Gupta, DR Malaviya, MM Roy, SK Mahanta, JB Singh, A Maity, PK Ghosh) pp. 236–247. (Range Management Society of India: Jhansi, India)

Badgery WB, Millar GD, Broadfoot K, Michalk DL, Cranney P, Mitchell D, van de Ven R (2017a) Increased production and cover in a variable native pasture following intensive grazing management. Animal Production Science 57, 1812–1823.
Increased production and cover in a variable native pasture following intensive grazing management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Badgery WB, Millar GD, Michalk DL, Cranney P, Broadfoot K (2017b) The intensity of grazing management influences lamb production from native grassland. Animal Production Science 57, 1837–1848.
The intensity of grazing management influences lamb production from native grassland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Banks RG (1994) LAMBPLAN: genetic evaluation for the Australian lamb industry. In ‘Proceedings of the 5th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production. Vol. 18’. (Eds C Smith, J Gavora, B Benkel, J Chesnais, W Fairfull, J Gibson, B Kennedy, B Burnside) pp. 15–18. (University of Guelph: Guelph, Canada)

Baumont R, Prache S, Meuret M, Morand-Fehr P (2000) How forage characteristics influence behaviour and intake in small ruminants: a review. Livestock Production Science 64, 15–28.
How forage characteristics influence behaviour and intake in small ruminants: a review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bell A, Graham P, Blackwood I, Clements B, Meaker G, Allan C, Ayres J, Buckley D, Donald G, Fulkerson B, Gaden B, Hill M, Holdsworth M, McDonald W, Jordan D, Langford C, Love S, Rose H, Simpsoon P, Shands C, Upjohn B, Turner A (2006) ‘PROGRAZE: profitable sustainable grazing.’ (NSW Department of Primary Industries: Orange, NSW)

Briske DD, Derner JD, Brown JR, Fuhlendorf SD, Teague WR, Havstad KM, Gillen RL, Ash AJ, Willms WD (2008) Rotational grazing on rangelands: reconciliation of perception and experimental evidence. Rangeland Ecology and Management 61, 3–17.
Rotational grazing on rangelands: reconciliation of perception and experimental evidence.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Briske DD, Ash AJ, Derner JD, Huntsinger L (2014) Commentary: a critical assessment of the policy endorsement for holistic management. Agricultural Systems 125, 50–53.
Commentary: a critical assessment of the policy endorsement for holistic management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Broadfoot KM, Badgery WB, Millar GD (2017) Post-experimental modelling of grazing systems to improve profit and environmental outcomes using AusFarm. Animal Production Science 57, 1849–1858.
Post-experimental modelling of grazing systems to improve profit and environmental outcomes using AusFarm.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Brown J, Kothmann M (2009) Rotational grazing on rangelands: synthesis and recommendations. Rangelands 31, 37–38.
Rotational grazing on rangelands: synthesis and recommendations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chapman DF, McCaskill MR, Quigley PE, Thompson AN, Graham JF, Borg D, Lamb J, Kearney G, Saul GR, Clark SG (2003) Effects of grazing method and fertiliser inputs on the productivity and sustainability of phalaris-based pastures in western Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 785–798.
Effects of grazing method and fertiliser inputs on the productivity and sustainability of phalaris-based pastures in western Victoria.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Chapman DF, Parsons AJ, Cosgrove GP, Barker DJ, Marotti DM, Venning KJ, Rutter SM, Hill J, Thompson AN (2007) Impacts of spatial patterns in pasture on animal grazing behavior, intake, and performance. Crop Science 47, 399–415.
Impacts of spatial patterns in pasture on animal grazing behavior, intake, and performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Cullen BR, Eckard RJ, Callow MN, Johnson IR, Chapman DF, Rawnsley RP, Garcia SC, White T, Snow VO (2008) Simulating pasture growth rates in Australian and New Zealand grazing systems. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 761–768.
Simulating pasture growth rates in Australian and New Zealand grazing systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Curnow M, Oldham CM, Behrendt R, Gordon DJ, Hyder MW, Rose IJ, Whale JW, Young JM, Thompson AN (2011) Successful adoption of new guidelines for the nutritional management of ewes is dependent on the development of appropriate tools and information. Animal Production Science 51, 851–856.
Successful adoption of new guidelines for the nutritional management of ewes is dependent on the development of appropriate tools and information.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dorrough J, Yen A, Turner V, Clark SG, Crosthwaite J, Hirth JR (2004) Livestock grazing managment and biodiversity conservation in Australian temperate grassy landscapes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 279–295.
Livestock grazing managment and biodiversity conservation in Australian temperate grassy landscapes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dowling PM, Michalk DL, Sindel BM (2000) Weed management in pasture systems. In ‘Australian weed management systems’. (Ed. BM Sindel) pp. 307–328. (RG and FG Richardson: Melbourne)

Dowling PM, Kemp DR, Ball PD, Langford CM, Michalk DL, Millar GD, Simpson PC, Thompson RP (2005) Effect of continuous and time-control grazing on grassland components in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45, 369–382.
Effect of continuous and time-control grazing on grassland components in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dubeux JCB, Sollenberger LE, Vendramini JMB, Interrante SM, Lira MA (2014) Stocking method, animal behavior, and soil nutrient redistribution: how are they linked? Crop Science 54, 2341–2350.
Stocking method, animal behavior, and soil nutrient redistribution: how are they linked?Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Freer M, Moore AD, Donnelly JR (1997) GRAZPLAN: decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises. 2. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS. Agricultural Systems 54, 77–126.
GRAZPLAN: decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises. 2. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Garden DL, Dowling PM, Eddy DA, Nicol HI (2000) A survey of farms on the Central, Southern and Monaro Tablelands of New South Wales: management practices, farmer knowledge of native grasses, and extent of native grass areas. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 1081–1088.
A survey of farms on the Central, Southern and Monaro Tablelands of New South Wales: management practices, farmer knowledge of native grasses, and extent of native grass areas.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Garden DL, Dowling PM, Eddy DA, Nicol HI (2001) The influence of climate, soil, and management on the composition of native grass pastures on the central, southern, and Monaro tablelands of New South Wales. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 925–936.
The influence of climate, soil, and management on the composition of native grass pastures on the central, southern, and Monaro tablelands of New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hackney B, Orchard P, Kemp D, Virgona J, Orchard B (2010) Factors affecting pasture growth in a topographically diverse native perennial grass pasture on the Central Tablelands of New South Wales. In ‘15th Australian agronomy conference’. (Eds H Dove, RA Culvenor) (Australian Society of Agronomy/The Regional Institute: Gosford, NSW)

Hazelton P, Murphy BW (2007) ‘Interpreting soil test results, what do all the numbers mean?’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Hinch GN, Hoad J, Lollback M, Hatcher S, Marchant R, Colvin A, Scott JM, Mackay D (2013) Livestock weights in response to three whole-farmlet management systems. Animal Production Science 53, 727–739.
Livestock weights in response to three whole-farmlet management systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Holechek JL, Gomes H, Molinar F, Galt D, Valdez R (2000) Short-duration grazing: the facts in 1999. Rangelands 22, 18–22.

Hughes JD, Packer IJ, Michalk DL, Dowling PM, King WM, Brisbane S, Millar GD, Priest SM, Kemp DR, Koen TB (2006) Sustainable grazing systems for the Central Tablelands of New South Wales. 4. Soil water dynamics and runoff events for differently-managed pasture types. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 483–494.
Sustainable grazing systems for the Central Tablelands of New South Wales. 4. Soil water dynamics and runoff events for differently-managed pasture types.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Isbell RF (2002) ‘The Australian soil classification.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Jeffrey SJ, Carter JO, Moodie KM, Beswick AR (2001) Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data. Environmental Modelling and Software 16, 309–330.

Johnson IR, Lodge GM, White RE (2003) The sustainable grazing systems pasture model: description, philosophy and application to the SGS national experiment. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 711–728.
The sustainable grazing systems pasture model: description, philosophy and application to the SGS national experiment.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Johnston WH, Mitchell ML, Koen TB, Mulham WE, Waterhouse DB (2001) LIGULE: an evaluation of indigenous perennial grasses for dryland salinity managment in south-eastern Australia 1. A base germplasm collection. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 52, 343–350.
LIGULE: an evaluation of indigenous perennial grasses for dryland salinity managment in south-eastern Australia 1. A base germplasm collection.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kaine G, Doyle B, Sutherland H, Scott JM (2013) Surveying the management practices and research needs of graziers in the New England region of New South Wales. Animal Production Science 53, 602–609.
Surveying the management practices and research needs of graziers in the New England region of New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kallenbach RL (2015) Describing the dynamic: measuring and assessing the value of plants in the pasture. Crop Science 55, 2531–2539.
Describing the dynamic: measuring and assessing the value of plants in the pasture.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC28XhsVWgtrzO&md5=fc2181ebc9dd9b788563c2c0338a609eCAS |

Kemp DR, Michalk DL, Virgona JM (2000) Towards more sustainable pastures: lessons learnt. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 343–356.
Towards more sustainable pastures: lessons learnt.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kemp DR, Badgery WB, Michalk DL (2015) Sustainable grasslands: resolving management options for livelihood and environmental benefits. In ‘Sustainable use of grassland resources for forage production, biodiversity and environmental protection. Proceedings of the 23rd international grassland congress, keynote lectures’. (Eds D Vijay, MK Srivastava, CK Gupta, DR Malaviya, MM Roy, SK Mahanta, JB Singh, A Maity, PK Ghosh) pp. 259–269. (Range Management Society of India: Jhansi, India)

King WM, Dowling PM, Michalk DL, Kemp DR, Millar GD, Packer IJ, Priest SM, Tarleton JA (2006) Sustainable grazing systems for the Central Tablelands of New South Wales. 1. Agronomic implications of vegetation-environment associations within a naturalised temperate perennial grassland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 46, 439–456.
Sustainable grazing systems for the Central Tablelands of New South Wales. 1. Agronomic implications of vegetation-environment associations within a naturalised temperate perennial grassland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lang D, McDonald W (2005) ‘Maintaining groundcover to reduce erosion and sustain production.’ (NSW Department of Primary Industries) Available at http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/162306/groundcover-for-pastures.pdf [Verified 6 July 2016]

Lewis C, Malcolm B, Farquharson R, Leury B, Behrendt R, Clarke S (2012) Economic analysis of improved perennial systems. Australian Farm Bussiness Management Journal 9, 37–56.

Lodge GM, Johnson IR (2008) Agricultural drought analyses for temperate Australia using a biophysical pasture model. 1. Identifying and characterising drought periods. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 1049–1060.
Agricultural drought analyses for temperate Australia using a biophysical pasture model. 1. Identifying and characterising drought periods.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mason WK, Kay G (2000) Temperate Pasture Sustainability Key Program: an overview. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 40, 121–123.
Temperate Pasture Sustainability Key Program: an overview.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mason WK, Lamb K, Russell B (2003) The Sustainable Grazing Systems Program: new solutions for livestock producers. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 43, 663–672.
The Sustainable Grazing Systems Program: new solutions for livestock producers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

McCosker T (2000) Cell grazing: the first 10 years in Australia. Tropical Grasslands 34, 207–218.

McCown RL (2001) Farming systems research and farming practice. In ‘Proceedings of the 10th Australian agronomy conference’. (Australian Society of Agronomy/The Regional Institute Ltd: Gosford, NSW) Available at http://regional.org.au/au/asa/2001/plenary/4/mccown.htm [Verified 24 June 2016]

McGrath SR, Virgona JM, Friend MA (2014) Modelling the effect on stocking rate and lamb production of allowing ewes to graze a dual-purpose wheat crop in southern New South Wales. Animal Production Science 54, 1625–1630.
Modelling the effect on stocking rate and lamb production of allowing ewes to graze a dual-purpose wheat crop in southern New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Millar GD, Jones RE, Michalk DL, Brady S (2009) An exploratory tool for analysis of forage and livestock production options. Animal Production Science 49, 788–796.
An exploratory tool for analysis of forage and livestock production options.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Mitchell DC, Badgery WB, Cranney P, Broadfoot K, Priest S, Pickering D (2017) In a native pasture, landscape properties influence soil moisture more than grazing management. Animal Production Science 57, 1799–1811.
In a native pasture, landscape properties influence soil moisture more than grazing management.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Moore AD, Holzworth DP, Herrmann NI, Huth NI, Robertson MJ (2007) The common modelling protocol: a hierarchical framework for simulation of agricultural and environmental systems. Agricultural Systems 95, 37–48.
The common modelling protocol: a hierarchical framework for simulation of agricultural and environmental systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morley FHW, Spedding CRW (1968) Agricultural systems and grazing experiments. Herbage Abstracts 38, 279–287.

Mullaney PD (1966) The influence of time of lambing on the performance of fine wool merino ewes. In ‘Proceeding of the 6th Australian Society of Animal Production conference’, Melbourne. (Ed. GR Pearce) pp. 198–205. (Australian Society of Animal Production)

Murison R, Scott JM (2013) Statistical methodologies for drawing causal inference from an unreplicated farmlet experiment conducted by the Cicerone Project. Animal Production Science 53, 643–648.
Statistical methodologies for drawing causal inference from an unreplicated farmlet experiment conducted by the Cicerone Project.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Norton BE (1998) The application of grazing management to increase sustainable livestock production. Proceedings of the Australian Society for Animal Production 22, 15–26.

Norton JB, Monaco TA, Norton U (2007) Mediterranean annual grasses in western North America: kids in a candy store. Plant and Soil 298, 1–5.
Mediterranean annual grasses in western North America: kids in a candy store.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtVejtrvO&md5=7bb558c6c3ca76debe4675a7033b634aCAS |

O’Reagain P, Scanlan J, Hunt L, Cowley R, Walsh D (2014) Sustainable grazing management for temporal and spatial variability in north Australian rangelands: a synthesis of the latest evidence and recommendations. The Rangeland Journal 36, 223–232.
Sustainable grazing management for temporal and spatial variability in north Australian rangelands: a synthesis of the latest evidence and recommendations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Prober SM, Thiele KR, Lunt ID (2002) Identifying ecological barriers to restoration in temperate grassy woodlands: soil changes associated with different degradation states. Australian Journal of Botany 50, 699–712.
Identifying ecological barriers to restoration in temperate grassy woodlands: soil changes associated with different degradation states.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXlvFamsw%3D%3D&md5=d85186dec7a6b2de506ee3664f7757d4CAS |

Radtke PJ, Boland HT, Scaglia G (2010) An evaluation of overhead laser scanning to estimate herbage removals in pasture quadrats. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 150, 1523–1528.
An evaluation of overhead laser scanning to estimate herbage removals in pasture quadrats.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Rayment GE, Lyons DJ (2011) ‘Soil chemical methods: Australasia.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Roguet C, Prache S, Petit M (1998) Feeding station behaviour of ewes in response to forage availability and sward phenological stage. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 56, 187–201.
Feeding station behaviour of ewes in response to forage availability and sward phenological stage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Salmon L, Palmer M, Moore AD, Donnelly JR, Simpson RJ, Stefanski AM, Freer M (2002) Testing grazing management recommendations: when is ‘best practice’ best? Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 50, 485–491.

Sanjari G, Ghadiri H, Ciesiolka CAA, Yu B (2008) Comparing the effects of continuous and time-controlled grazing systems on soil characteristics in southeast Queensland. Australian Journal of Soil Research 46, 348–358.
Comparing the effects of continuous and time-controlled grazing systems on soil characteristics in southeast Queensland.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sargeant K (2014) EverGraze VI: final report. Meat & Livestock Australia Ltd, Sydney.

Sargeant K, Glyde S (2013) From research to practice change: achieving adoption through regionally packaged technology and farm systems. In ‘Proceedings 22nd international grassland congress, Sydney. Vol. 3’. (Eds D Michalk, G Millar, W Badgery, K Broadfoot) pp. 1848–1851. (NSW Department of Primary Industries: Orange, NSW)

Scott JM, Behrendt K, Colvin A, Scott F, Shakhane LM, Guppy C, Hoad J, Gaden CA, Edwards C, Hinch GN, Cacho OJ, Donald GE, Cottle D, Coventry T, Williams G, Mackay DF (2013a) Integrated overview of results from a farmlet experiment which compared the effects of pasture inputs and grazing management on profitability and sustainability. Animal Production Science 53, 841–855.
Integrated overview of results from a farmlet experiment which compared the effects of pasture inputs and grazing management on profitability and sustainability.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Scott JM, Gaden CA, Edwards C, Paull DR, Marchant R, Hoad J, Sutherland H, Coventry T, Dutton P (2013b) Selection of experimental treatments, methods used and evolution of management guidelines for comparing and measuring three grazed farmlet systems. Animal Production Science 53, 628–642.
Selection of experimental treatments, methods used and evolution of management guidelines for comparing and measuring three grazed farmlet systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Scott JM, Munro M, Rollings N, Browne W, Vickery PJ, Macgregor C, Donald GE, Sutherland H (2013c) Planning for whole-farm systems research at a credible scale: subdividing land into farmlets with equivalent initial conditions. Animal Production Science 53, 618–627.
Planning for whole-farm systems research at a credible scale: subdividing land into farmlets with equivalent initial conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Sollenberger LE (2015) Challenges, opportunities and applications of grazing research. Crop Science 55, 2540–2549.
Challenges, opportunities and applications of grazing research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Teague WR, Provenza FD, Norton BE, Steffens T, Barnes MK, Kothmann MM, Roath RL (2009) Benefits of multi-paddock grazing management on rangelands: limitations of experimental grazing research and knowledge gaps. In ‘Grasslands: ecology, management and restoration’. (Ed. HG Schroder) pp. 41–80. (Nova Science Publishers: New York)

Tothill JC, Hargraves JNG, Jones RM (1992) ‘BOTANAL: a comprehensive sampling and computing procedure for estimating pasture yield and composition. I. Field sampling.’ Technical memorandum no. 78. (CSIRO Australian Division of Tropical Crops and Pastures: Brisbane)

Tozer KN, Chapman DF, Quigley PE, Dowling PM, Cousens RD, Kearney GA (2008) Effect of grazing, gap dynamics, and inter-specific seedling competition on growth and survival of Vulpia spp. and Hordeum murinum ssp leporinum. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 59, 646–655.
Effect of grazing, gap dynamics, and inter-specific seedling competition on growth and survival of Vulpia spp. and Hordeum murinum ssp leporinum.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Trotter M, Badgery W, Barron J, Guppy C, Haling R, Mitchell D, Millar G (2013) Spatial variability of soil phosphorus in grazing systems. In ‘Proceedings of the 22nd international grassland congress, Sydney’. (Eds D Michalk, G Millar, W Badgery, K Broadfoot) pp. 856–859. (NSW Department of Primary Industries: Orange, NSW)

Vere DT, Jones RE, Dowling PM, Kemp DR (2002) Economic impact of Vulpia in temperate pasture systems in south-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 42, 465–472.
Economic impact of Vulpia in temperate pasture systems in south-eastern Australia.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Waller RA, Sale PWG, Saul GR, Kearney GA (2001) Tactical versus continuous stocking in perennial ryegrass–subterranean clover pastures grazed by sheep in south-western Victoria. 1. Stocking rates and herbage production. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 1099–1108.
Tactical versus continuous stocking in perennial ryegrass–subterranean clover pastures grazed by sheep in south-western Victoria. 1. Stocking rates and herbage production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Warn LK, Frame HR, McLarty GR (2002) Effects of grazing method and soil fertility on stocking rate and wool production. Wool Technology and Sheep Breeding 50, 510–517.

Watt BR, Bird TL (1998) Economic comparison of centre plus merino and first-cross ewes as prime lamb dams. Animal Production in Australia 22, 241–244.

Young JM, Thompson AN, Curnow M, Oldham CM (2011) Whole-farm profit and the optimum maternal liveweight profile of Merino ewe flocks lambing in winter and spring are influenced by the effects of ewe nutrition on the progeny’s survival and lifetime wool production. Animal Production Science 51, 821–833.
Whole-farm profit and the optimum maternal liveweight profile of Merino ewe flocks lambing in winter and spring are influenced by the effects of ewe nutrition on the progeny’s survival and lifetime wool production.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |