Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

The influence of housing and feeding systems on selected fattening and slaughter parameters of finishing pigs with different genotypes

Damian Knecht A , Anna Jankowska-Mąkosa A , Sebastian Środoń A and Kamil Duziński A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Institute of Animal Breeding, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Chelmonskiego 38C, 51-630 Wroclaw, Poland.

B Corresponding author. Email: kamil.duzinski@upwr.edu.pl

Animal Production Science 58(10) 1915-1921 https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16390
Submitted: 16 June 2016  Accepted: 21 April 2017   Published: 24 May 2017

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to demonstrate the influence of housing and feeding systems on selected fattening and slaughter parameters of finishers with different genotypes. The experimental population consisted of 1200 finishers in three genetic variants from the Landrace (L), Large White (LW), Duroc (D) and Pietrain (P) breeds: 400 finishers L × [D × P] genotype, 400 finishers LW × [D × P] genotype and 400 finishers [L × LW] × [D × P] genotype. Subgroups were isolated for each genetic variant with the experimental factors: housing system (slatted floor or deep litter) and feeding system (dry or liquid). Selected fattening parameters were analysed: final liveweight (kg), mortality (%), average daily gain (g/day) and feed conversion ratio (kg/kg gain). Additionally, slaughter parameters were analysed: carcass weight (kg), height of longissimus dorsi (LD) muscle (mm), backfat thickness (mm) and lean meat content (%). The housing system strongly affected the final liveweight, average daily gain and carcass weight. To a lesser degree, this factor determined the mortality, feed conversion ratio, height of LD muscle, backfat thickness and lean meat content. The feeding system substantially affected almost all fattening parameters, except for the mortality. Statistical analysis of slaughter parameters showed that the impact of the feeding system was confirmed statistically only in terms of carcass weight. Genotype largely determined the final liveweight, average daily gain, carcass weight and lean meat content. Taking into account interactions of all factors, the most favourable effect in terms of production was to fattening four-way crossbreeds [L × LW] × [D × P] on slatted floors and fed by liquid feeding.

Additional keywords: crossbreed finishers, deep litter, liquid feed, slated floor.


References

Averós X, Brossard L, Dourmad JY, de Greef KH, Edge HL, Edwards SA, Meunier-Salaün MC (2010) Quantitative assessment of the effects of space allowance, group size and floor characteristics on the lying behaviour of growing-finishing pigs. Animal 4, 777–783.
Quantitative assessment of the effects of space allowance, group size and floor characteristics on the lying behaviour of growing-finishing pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Beattie VE, O’Connell NE, Moss BW (2000) Influence of environmental enrichment on the behaviour, performance and meat quality of domestic pigs. Livestock Production Science 65, 71–79.
Influence of environmental enrichment on the behaviour, performance and meat quality of domestic pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Bergsma R, Mathur PK, Kanis E, Verstegen MWA, Knol EF, van Arendonk JAM (2013) Genetic correlations between lactation performance and growing-finishing traits in pigs. Journal of Animal Science 91, 3601–3611.
Genetic correlations between lactation performance and growing-finishing traits in pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3sXhtlOjsbjL&md5=e365c0096560063aed11fe4523da7342CAS |

Canibe N, Jensen BB (2003) Fermented and nonfermented liquid feed to growing pigs: effect on aspects of gastrointestinal ecology and growth performance. Journal of Animal Science 81, 2019–2031.
Fermented and nonfermented liquid feed to growing pigs: effect on aspects of gastrointestinal ecology and growth performance.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXlslGhu7w%3D&md5=2109c56afde9c2861a4ddb5ec9ba66ddCAS |

Cassady JP, Young LD, Leymaster KA (2002) Heterosis and recombination effects on pig growth and carcass traits. Journal of Animal Science 80, 2286–2302.
Heterosis and recombination effects on pig growth and carcass traits.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XntVygsLk%3D&md5=43da9f9ca0870efd93b0f74f711f867eCAS |

Cumby TR (1986) Design requirements of liquid feeding systems for pigs: A review. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 34, 153–172.
Design requirements of liquid feeding systems for pigs: A review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Deperez P, Deroose P, van den Hende C, Muylle E, Oyaert W (1987) Liquid versus dry feeding in weaned piglets: the influence on small intestinal morphology. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series B 34, 254–259.
Liquid versus dry feeding in weaned piglets: the influence on small intestinal morphology.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Dung NNX, Manh LH, Ogle B (2005) Effects of fermented liquid feeds on the performance, digestibility, nitrogen retention and plasma urea nitrogen (PUN) of growing-finishing pigs. Livestock Research for Rural Development 17, 1–12.

Fraser D, Phillips PA, Thompson BK, Tennessen T (1991) Effect of straw on the behaviour of growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 30, 307–318.
Effect of straw on the behaviour of growing pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Geary TM, Brooks PH, Beal JD, Campbell A (1999) Effect on weaner pig performance and diet microbiology of feeding a liquid diet acidified to pH 4 with either lactic acid or through fermentation with Pediococcus acidilactici. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 79, 633–640.
Effect on weaner pig performance and diet microbiology of feeding a liquid diet acidified to pH 4 with either lactic acid or through fermentation with Pediococcus acidilactici.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXivVymu70%3D&md5=fde0f722d5558d08ae73961ac251a141CAS |

Gentry JG, McGlone JJ, Blanton JR, Miller MF (2002) Alternative housing systems for pigs: influences on growth, composition and pork quality. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1781–1790.
Alternative housing systems for pigs: influences on growth, composition and pork quality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XmvVelsr8%3D&md5=7047b385671b5afa41e502c6d52cae62CAS |

Gispert M, Font I, Furnols M, Gil M, Velarde A, Diestre A, Carrión D, Sosnicki AA, Plastow GS (2007) Relationships between carcass quality parameters and genetic types. Meat Science 77, 397–404.
Relationships between carcass quality parameters and genetic types.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3MbnsVCisg%3D%3D&md5=bebe9b4f3763b96fb5ee6c58797ce7a5CAS |

Guy JH, Rowlinson P, Chadwick JP, Ellis M (2002) Behaviour of two genotypes of growing-finishing pig in three different housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 75, 193–206.
Behaviour of two genotypes of growing-finishing pig in three different housing systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Hötzel MJ, Lopes EJC, de Oliveira PAV, Guidoni AL (2009) Behaviour and performance of pigs finished on deep bedding with wood shavings or rice husks in summer. Animal Welfare (South Mimms, England) 18, 65–71.

Hurst D, Clarke L, Lean IJ (2008) Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs. Animal 2, 1297–1302.
Effect of liquid feeding at different water-to-feed ratios on the growth performance of growing-finishing pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhvVKmtr8%3D&md5=35745c8299d4f6b1d9d3e9618d51a9ddCAS |

Jensen BB, Mikkelsen LL (1998) Feeding liquid diets to pigs. In ‘Recent advances in animal nutrition’. (Eds PC Garnsworthy, J Wiseman) pp. 107–126. (Nottingham University Press: Nottingham, UK)

Jensen MB, Pedersen LJ (2007) The value assigned to six different rooting materials by growing pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 108, 31–44.
The value assigned to six different rooting materials by growing pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Karpiesiuk K, Falkowski J (2008) Effect of the feeding and housing system on pig fattening results. Polish Journal of Natural Sciences 23, 769–778.
Effect of the feeding and housing system on pig fattening results.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Kim JH, Heo KN, Odle J, Han IK, Harrell RJ (2001) Liquid diets accelerate the growth of early weaned pigs and effects are maintained to market weight. Journal of Animal Science 79, 427–434.
Liquid diets accelerate the growth of early weaned pigs and effects are maintained to market weight.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXjsFCnsbk%3D&md5=8ed94dd43f50142124a06815320fc463CAS |

Knecht D, Duziński K (2014) The effect of parity and date of service on the reproductive performance of Polish Large White × Polish Landrace (PLW×PL) crossbred sows. Annals of Animal Science 14, 69–79.
The effect of parity and date of service on the reproductive performance of Polish Large White × Polish Landrace (PLW×PL) crossbred sows.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Knecht D, Jasek S, Procak A, Krzyżewski P (2004) Efficiency of inseminating sows with pure breed and crossbreed boars. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 60, 1208–1211.

Knecht D, Środoń S, Szulc K, Duziński K (2013) The effect of photoperiod on selected parameters of boar semen. Livestock Science 157, 364–371.
The effect of photoperiod on selected parameters of boar semen.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Knecht D, Środoń S, Duziński K (2014) The influence of boar breed and season on semen parameters. South African Journal of Animal Science 44, 1–9.
The influence of boar breed and season on semen parameters.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lebret B (2008) Effects of feeding and rearing systems on growth, carcass composition and meat quality in pigs. Animal 2, 1548–1558.
Effects of feeding and rearing systems on growth, carcass composition and meat quality in pigs.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXitVWitrk%3D&md5=5683ab98dc0f5bb163933be23aabc326CAS |

Lisiak D, Borzuta K, Janiszewski P, Magda F, Grześkowiak E, Strzelecki J, Powałowski K, Lisiak B (2012) Verification of regression equations for estimating pork carcass meatiness using CGM, IM-03, Fat-O-Meat’er II and UltraFom 300 devices. Annals of Animal Science 12, 585–596.
Verification of regression equations for estimating pork carcass meatiness using CGM, IM-03, Fat-O-Meat’er II and UltraFom 300 devices.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Lisiak D, Duziński K, Borzuta K, Janiszewski P, Knecht D (2015) A new simple method for estimating the pork carcass mass of primal cuts and lean meat content of the carcass. Animal Production Science 55, 1044–1050.
A new simple method for estimating the pork carcass mass of primal cuts and lean meat content of the carcass.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Liu GY, Xiong YZ, Deng CY, Zuo B, Zhang JH (2004) Comparison of gene expression patterns in Longissimus dorsi of pigs between the high-parent heterosis cross combination Landrace×Large White and the mid-parent heterosis cross combination Large White×Meishan. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 17, 1192–1196.
Comparison of gene expression patterns in Longissimus dorsi of pigs between the high-parent heterosis cross combination Landrace×Large White and the mid-parent heterosis cross combination Large White×Meishan.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXotFyhtL4%3D&md5=110931d794fff263fe9bdc4386969549CAS |

Losinger WC, Bush EJ, Smith MA, Corso BA (1998) An analysis of mortality in the grower/finisher phase of swine production in United States. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 33, 121–145.
An analysis of mortality in the grower/finisher phase of swine production in United States.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7mtFWnuw%3D%3D&md5=ef3412c7d86f4cd16854c36f4158233fCAS |

Maes DGD, Duchateau L, Larriestra A, Deen J, Morrison RB, de Kruif A (2004) Risk factors for mortality in grow-finishing pigs in Belgium. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series B 51, 321–326.
Risk factors for mortality in grow-finishing pigs in Belgium.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2crltlGqtQ%3D%3D&md5=f4eedba789676f4b89f46b35cb30aa7bCAS |

Maswaure SM, Mandisodza KT (1995) An evaluation of the performance of weaner pigs fed diets incorporating fresh sweet liquid whey. Animal Feed Science and Technology 54, 193–201.
An evaluation of the performance of weaner pigs fed diets incorporating fresh sweet liquid whey.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morrison RS, Hemsworth PH, Cronin GM, Campbell RG (2003) The social and feeding behaviour of growing pigs in deep-litter, large group housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 82, 173–188.
The social and feeding behaviour of growing pigs in deep-litter, large group housing systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Morrison RS, Johnston LJ, Hilbrands AM (2007) The behaviour, welfare, growth performance and meat quality of pigs housed in a deep-litter, large group housing system compared to a conventional confinement system. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 103, 12–24.
The behaviour, welfare, growth performance and meat quality of pigs housed in a deep-litter, large group housing system compared to a conventional confinement system.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Oliveira J, Yus E, Guitián FJ (2009) Effects of management, environmental and temporal factors on mortality and feed consumption in integrated swine fattening farms. Livestock Science 123, 221–229.
Effects of management, environmental and temporal factors on mortality and feed consumption in integrated swine fattening farms.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Ordinance of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development (2010) The requirements and how to proceed while maintaining livestock species for which protection standards are provisions of the European Union. Journal of Laws from 2010, No. 56, item 344, as amended. (Warsaw, Poland)

Patton BS, Huff-Lonergan E, Honeyman MS, Kerr BJ, Lonergan SM (2008) Effects of space allocation within a deep-bedded finishing system on pig growth performance, fatty acid composition and pork quality. Animal 2, 471–478.

Plumed‐Ferrer C, von Wright A (2009) Fermented pig liquid feed: nutritional, safety and regulatory aspects. Journal of Applied Microbiology 106, 351–368.
Fermented pig liquid feed: nutritional, safety and regulatory aspects.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjtFKltbo%3D&md5=575528ed719574fa0c333ad75d25089dCAS |

Rothschild MF (2015) Molecular and quantitative animal genetics. In ‘Genetic and genomics improvement of pigs’. (Ed. H Khatib) pp. 97–104. (John Willey & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ)

Scholten R, van der Peet-Schwering CMC, den Hartog LA, Schrama JW, Verstegen MWA (2002) Fermented wheat in liquid diets: effects on gastrointestial characteristics in weanling piglets. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1179–1186.
Fermented wheat in liquid diets: effects on gastrointestial characteristics in weanling piglets.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XmvVeksLc%3D&md5=c5e4601a8898c22a6f86e7980aabd551CAS |

Scott K, Chennells DJ, Armstrong D, Taylor L, Gill BP, Edwards SA (2007) The welfare of finishing pigs under different housing and feeding systems: liquid versus dry feeding in fully-slatted and straw-based housing. Animal Welfare (South Mimms, England) 16, 53–62.

Skiba G, Raj S (2014) Nutritional recommendations. In ‘Polish swine nutrition requirements’. (Eds ER Grela, J Skomiał) pp. 53–65. (The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition: Jabłonna, Poland)

Skiba G, Raj S, Poławska E, Pastuszewska B, Elminowska-Wenda G, Bogucka J, Knecht D (2012) Profile of fatty acids, muscle structure and shear force of musculus longissimus dorsi (MLD) in growing pigs as affected by energy and protein or protein restriction followed by realimentation. Meat Science 91, 339–346.
Profile of fatty acids, muscle structure and shear force of musculus longissimus dorsi (MLD) in growing pigs as affected by energy and protein or protein restriction followed by realimentation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC38XlvFGhs7g%3D&md5=38f96ffa898162461e85d69d18b0a1f5CAS |

Sundrum A, Aragon A, Schulze-Langenhorst C, Bütfering L, Henning M, Stalljohann G (2011) Effects of feeding strategies, genotypes, sex, and birth weight on carcass and meat quality traits under organic pig production conditions. NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 58, 163–172.
Effects of feeding strategies, genotypes, sex, and birth weight on carcass and meat quality traits under organic pig production conditions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Switonski M, Stachowiak M, Cieslak J, Bartz M, Grzes M (2010) Genetics of fat tissue accumulation in pigs: a comparative approach. Journal of Applied Genetics 51, 153–168.
Genetics of fat tissue accumulation in pigs: a comparative approach.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cnkt1Wqsg%3D%3D&md5=f4bf9c1aba91cff41d91fa4e806c6834CAS |

Turner SP, Ewen M, Rooke JA, Edwards SA (2000) The effect of space allowance on performance, aggression and immune competence of growing pigs housed on straw deep-litter at different group sizes. Livestock Production Science 66, 47–55.
The effect of space allowance on performance, aggression and immune competence of growing pigs housed on straw deep-litter at different group sizes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

Wysokińska A, Kondracki S (2013) Assessment of the effect of heterosis on semen parameters of two-breed crosses of Duroc, Hampshire and Pietrain boars. Archiv fur Tierzucht 56, 65–74.