Planning for subacute care: predicting demand using acute activity data
Janette P. Green A C , Jennifer P. McNamee A , Conrad Kobel A , Md Habibur R. Seraji A and Suanne J. Lawrence BA Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Building 234 (iC Enterprise 1), Innovation Campus, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia. Email: jmcnamee@uow.edu.au; ckobel@uow.edu.au; habibur@uow.edu.au
B School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 135, Hobart, Tas. 7001, Australia. Email: Suanne.Lawrence@utas.edu.au
C Corresponding author. Email: janette@uow.edu.au
Australian Health Review 40(6) 686-690 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH15192
Submitted: 14 October 2015 Accepted: 19 January 2016 Published: 7 April 2016
Abstract
Objective The aim of the present study was to develop a robust model that uses the concept of ‘rehabilitation-sensitive’ Diagnosis Related Groups (DRGs) in predicting demand for rehabilitation and geriatric evaluation and management (GEM) care following acute in-patient episodes provided in Australian hospitals.
Methods The model was developed using statistical analyses of national datasets, informed by a panel of expert clinicians and jurisdictional advice. Logistic regression analysis was undertaken using acute in-patient data, published national hospital statistics and data from the Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre.
Results The predictive model comprises tables of probabilities that patients will require rehabilitation or GEM care after an acute episode, with columns defined by age group and rows defined by grouped Australian Refined (AR)-DRGs.
Conclusions The existing concept of rehabilitation-sensitive DRGs was revised and extended. When applied to national data, the model provided a conservative estimate of 83% of the activity actually provided. An example demonstrates the application of the model for service planning.
What is known about the topic? Health service planning is core business for jurisdictions and local areas. With populations ageing and an acknowledgement of the underservicing of subacute care, it is timely to find improved methods of estimating demand for this type of care. Traditionally, age–sex standardised utilisation rates for individual DRGs have been applied to Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) population projections to predict the future need for subacute services. Improved predictions became possible when some AR-DRGs were designated ‘rehabilitation-sensitive’. This improved methodology has been used in several Australian jurisdictions.
What does this paper add? This paper presents a new tool, or model, to predict demand for rehabilitation and GEM services based on in-patient acute activity. In this model, the methodology based on rehabilitation-sensitive AR-DRGs has been extended by updating them to AR-DRG Version 7.0, quantifying the level of ‘sensitivity’ and incorporating the patient’s age to improve the prediction of demand for subacute services.
What are the implications for practitioners? The predictive model takes the form of tables of probabilities that patients will require rehabilitation or GEM care after an acute episode and can be applied to acute in-patient administrative datasets in any Australian jurisdiction or local area. The use of patient-level characteristics will enable service planners to improve their forecasting of demand for these services. Clinicians and jurisdictional representatives consulted during the project regarded the model favourably and believed that it was an improvement on currently available methods.
References
[1] National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. A healthier future for all Australians: final report. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2009.[2] Poulos CJ, Eagar K, Faux SG, Estell JJ, Crotty M. Subacute care funding in the firing line. Med J Aust 2013; 199 92–3.
| Subacute care funding in the firing line.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23879492PubMed |
[3] Australian Government Productivity Commission. National partnership performance reporting. Canberra: Australian Government Productivity Commission; 2015. Available at: http://www.pc.gov.au/research/completed/national-partnership/hospital-health-agreement [verified 16 February 2015].
[4] Milne P, Eagar K. Rehabilitation services in Tasmania: current situation and future plans. Wollongong: Centre for Health Service Development, University of Wollongong; 2007.
[5] Eagar K. Rehabilitation-sensitive DRG analysis South Australia. Wollongong: Centre for Health Service Development, University of Wollongong; 2009.
[6] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australian hospital statistics 2010–11. Canberra: AIHW; 2012.
[7] Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Australian hospital statistics 2011–12. Canberra: AIHW; 2013.