Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE (Open Access)

Time to analgesia for musculoskeletal presentations in Tasmanian emergency departments: a case-controlled comparative observational study investigating the impact of advanced practice physiotherapists

David Jovic https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7772-4304 A B C * , Kirby Tuckerman D , Claire Bergenroth D and Viet Tran B E F
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Physiotherapy Department, Royal Hobart Hospital, Tas., Australia.

B Emergency Department, Royal Hobart Hospital, Tas., Australia.

C Tasmanian School of Health Sciences, University of Tasmania, Tas., Australia.

D Physiotherapy Department, Launceston General Hospital, Tas., Australia.

E Tasmanian School of Medical Sciences, University of Tasmania, Tas., Australia.

F Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Tas., Australia.

* Correspondence to: david.jovic@ths.tas.gov.au

Australian Health Review 47(3) 268-273 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH23032
Submitted: 21 February 2023  Accepted: 23 April 2023   Published: 16 May 2023

© 2023 The Author(s) (or their employer(s)). Published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of AHHA. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND)

Abstract

Objective To assess the timeliness of analgesia provided to patients presenting with musculoskeletal conditions, by advanced practice physiotherapists, medical officers and nurse practitioners in two Tasmanian emergency departments.

Methods A retrospective case-controlled comparative observational study collected patient data over a 6 month period. Index cases were consecutive cases treated by an advanced practice physiotherapist, with a medical and nurse practitioner cohort case-matched based on clinical and demographic factors. Time to analgesia from initial triage and time to analgesia from patient allocation to health professional groups were analysed using Mann–Whitney U-test. Further assessment comparing between-group differences in access to analgesia within 30 and 60 min of emergency department triage was included.

Results Two hundred and twenty-four patients who received analgesia while in the primary care of advanced practice physiotherapists were matched against 308 others. Median time to analgesia for the advanced practice physiotherapy group was 40.5 min compared with 59 min in the comparison group (P = 0.001). Allocation to analgesia time for the advanced practice physiotherapy group was 27 min, compared with 30 min in the comparison group (P = 0.465). Access to analgesia within 30 min of presentation to the emergency department is low (36.1% vs 30.8%, P = 0.175).

Conclusion For musculoskeletal presentations in two Tasmanian emergency departments, patients received more timely analgesia when in the care of an advanced practice physiotherapist compared with medical or nurse practitioner care. Further improvements in analgesia access are possible, with time from allocation to analgesia a potential target for intervention.

Keywords: analgesia, hospital, model of care, performance and evaluation, physiotherapist, pharmaceuticals, workforce.


References

[1]  Todd KH. A Review of current and emerging approaches to pain management in the emergency department. Pain Ther 2017; 6 193–202.
A Review of current and emerging approaches to pain management in the emergency department.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[2]  Strudwick K, Russell T, Bell AJ, Chatfield MD, Martin-Khan M. Musculoskeletal injury quality outcome indicators for the emergency department. Intern Emerg Med 2020; 15 501–14.
Musculoskeletal injury quality outcome indicators for the emergency department.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[3]  Ferreira GE, Traeger AC, Maher CG. Review article: A scoping review of physiotherapists in the adult emergency department. Emerg Med Australas 2019; 31 43–57.
Review article: A scoping review of physiotherapists in the adult emergency department.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[4]  Strudwick K, Martin R, Coombes F, Bell A, Martin-Khan M, Russell T. Higher quality of care in emergency departments with physiotherapy service models. Emerg Med Australas 2022; 34 209–22.
Higher quality of care in emergency departments with physiotherapy service models.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[5]  de Gruchy A, Granger C, Gorelik A. Physical Therapists as Primary Practitioners in the Emergency Department: Six-Month Prospective Practice Analysis. Phys Ther 2015; 95 1207–16.
Physical Therapists as Primary Practitioners in the Emergency Department: Six-Month Prospective Practice Analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Tasmanian Government. Tasmanian Poisons Regulations. Hobart; 2008. Available at https://www.legislation.tas.gov.au/view/html/inforce/2009-01-01/sr-2008-162

[7]  The Australasian Triage Scale. Emerg Med (Fremantle) 2002; 14 335–6.
The Australasian Triage Scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[8]  Fein JA, Zempsky WT, Cravero JP, The Committee on Pediatric Emergency Medicine and Section on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Shaw KN, Ackerman AD, Chun TH, Conners GP, Dudley NC, Fein JA, Fuchs SM, Moore BR, Selbst SM, Wright JL, Bannister CF, Tobias JD, Anderson CTM, Goldschneider KR, Koh JL, Polaner DM, Houck CS. Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems. Pediatrics 2012; 130 e1391–405.
Relief of pain and anxiety in pediatric patients in emergency medical systems.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[9]  Hatherley C, Jennings N, Cross R. Time to analgesia and pain score documentation best practice standards for the Emergency Department – A literature review. Australas Emerg Nurs J 2016; 19 26–36.
Time to analgesia and pain score documentation best practice standards for the Emergency Department – A literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[10]  Jennings N, Kansal A, O’Reilly G, Mitra B, Gardner G. Time to analgesia for care delivered by nurse practitioners in the emergency department – a retrospective chart audit. Int Emerg Nurs 2015; 23 71–4.
Time to analgesia for care delivered by nurse practitioners in the emergency department – a retrospective chart audit.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[11]  Alkhouri H, Maka K, Wong L, McCarthy S. Impact of the primary contact physiotherapy practitioner role on emergency department care for patients with musculoskeletal injuries in New South Wales. Emerg Med Australas 2019; 32 202–9.
Impact of the primary contact physiotherapy practitioner role on emergency department care for patients with musculoskeletal injuries in New South Wales.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[12]  Austin PC, Rothwell DM, Tu JV. A comparison of statistical modeling strategies for analyzing length of stay after CABG surgery. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 2002; 3 107–33.
A comparison of statistical modeling strategies for analyzing length of stay after CABG surgery.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[13]  Hart A. Mann-Whitney test is not just a test of medians: differences in spread can be important. BMJ 2001; 323 391–3.
Mann-Whitney test is not just a test of medians: differences in spread can be important.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[14]  Cruickshank M. An evaluation of physiotherapist independent prescribing in Queensland. 2019 National Allied Health Conference Presentation; 2019. Available at http://www.nahc.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/TUE-1030_4-Mark-Cruickshank.pdf

[15]  Medicines and Poisons Act. Extended practice authority – Physiotherapists. Brisbane: Queensland Government; 2019.

[16]  Song JW, Chung KC. Observational studies: cohort and case-control studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 2234–42.
Observational studies: cohort and case-control studies.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[17]  Mansournia MA, Jewell NP, Greenland S. Case-control matching: effects, misconceptions, and recommendations. Eur J Epidemiol 2018; 33 5–14.
Case-control matching: effects, misconceptions, and recommendations.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |