Register      Login
Australian Health Review Australian Health Review Society
Journal of the Australian Healthcare & Hospitals Association
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Reduced individual treatment delivery has no effect on outcomes in a multidisciplinary pain management program

Rebecca M. Mowat https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4281-4518 A C , Gwyn N. Lewis A and Robert Borotkanics B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A Department of Nursing, School of Clinical Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. Email: gwyn.lewis@aut.ac.nz

B Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand. Email: rborotk1@alumni.jh.edu

C Corresponding author. Email: rebecca.marie.mowat@aut.ac.nz

Australian Health Review 46(1) 100-106 https://doi.org/10.1071/AH21018
Submitted: 13 January 2021  Accepted: 5 August 2021   Published: 14 October 2021

Abstract

Objective There is little information on how multidisciplinary pain management programs (MPMPs), the gold-standard treatment for people with chronic non-cancer pain, should be structured or delivered. This study compared outcomes from a 3-week in-patient MPMP between those who attended a group-based program that included 8 h of individual therapy each week and those who attended when the amount of individual therapy had been halved.

Methods Participants were patients attending an MPMP with a large component of individual sessions (n = 112; Standard) and patients attending the same MPMP after it switched to predominantly group-based sessions (n = 117; Revised). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Queen Elizabeth (QE) Health Scale were administered to participants at baseline and discharge. Regression analysis was used to compare outcomes between the two delivery formats.

Results There were no significant differences in any outcome measures between the two delivery formats overall. The QE Health Scale (P < 0.001) and HADS depression (P < 0.05) scores were significantly better for patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis who had undertaken the Revised program compared with the Standard program.

Conclusions This study provides support that changing the amount of individual therapy within in-patient MPMPs does not change patient outcomes. However, there is evidence that those with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis respond better to a more group-based approach, suggesting that different populations may be suited to different delivery formats.

What is known about the topic? Studies have shown mixed results as to whether group- or individual-based rehabilitation programs are more effective. Previous systematic reviews on physiotherapy- or psychological-based interventions have concluded that individual and group approaches are generally equivalent in terms of patient outcomes. MPMPs are trending towards more group-based delivery of content; however, it is unknown whether the equivalence of efficacy between group and individual formats extends to a chronic pain population receiving multidisciplinary care.

What does this paper add? This research specifically adds to the knowledge that almost exclusive group delivery of therapy is just as effective as a program with more individual components in a population of patients participating in an MPMP. There is some evidence that those with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis in the almost exclusive group delivery program had better outcomes than those in the program with more individual components, indicating that specific conditions may benefit more from a group approach.

What are the implications for practitioners? Practitioners can be confident that group delivery is just as effective as individual delivery of program components in an MPMP. Thus, decisions regarding the delivery format can be based on factors such as practical considerations, cost or patient and clinician preference.


References

[1]  Access Economics. The cost of pain in Australia. 2019. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/au/en/pages/economics/articles/cost-pain-australia.html

[2]  Ministry of Health. Annual Update of Key Results 2018/19: New Zealand Health Survey. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2019.

[3]  Bair MJ, Robinson RL, Katon W, Kroenke K. Depression and pain comorbidity: a literature review. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163 2433–45.
Depression and pain comorbidity: a literature review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 14609780PubMed |

[4]  Holloway I, Sofaer-Bennett B, Walker J. The stigmatisation of people with chronic back pain. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29 1456–64.
The stigmatisation of people with chronic back pain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17729093PubMed |

[5]  Romano JM, Turner JA, Jensen MP. The family environment in chronic pain patients: Comparison to controls and relationship to patient functioning. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 1997; 4 383–95.
The family environment in chronic pain patients: Comparison to controls and relationship to patient functioning.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[6]  Kawai K, Kawai AT, Wollan P, Yawn BP. Adverse impacts of chronic pain on health-related quality of life, work productivity, depression and anxiety in a community-based study. Fam Pract 2017; 34 656–61.
Adverse impacts of chronic pain on health-related quality of life, work productivity, depression and anxiety in a community-based study.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28444208PubMed |

[7]  Blyth FM, March LM, Nicholas MK, Cousins MJ. Chronic pain, work performance and litigation. Pain 2003; 103 41–7.
Chronic pain, work performance and litigation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 12749957PubMed |

[8]  van Leeuwen MT, Blyth FM, March LM, Nicholas MK, Cousins MJ. Chronic pain and reduced work effectiveness: the hidden cost to Australian employers. Eur J Pain 2006; 10 161–6.
Chronic pain and reduced work effectiveness: the hidden cost to Australian employers.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16310720PubMed |

[9]  Access Economics. The high price of pain: The economic impact of persistent pain in Australia. 2007. Available at: https://www.painaustralia.org.au/static/uploads/files/mbf-economic-impact-wffhrlzqsaht.pdf

[10]  Scascighini L, Toma V, Dober-Spielmann S, Sprott H. Multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain: a systematic review of interventions and outcomes. Rheumatology 2008; 47 670–8.
Multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain: a systematic review of interventions and outcomes.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18375406PubMed |

[11]  Guzmán J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Irvin E, Bombardier C. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review. BMJ 2001; 322 1511–6.
Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11420271PubMed |

[12]  Waterschoot FP, Dijkstra PU, Hollak N, de Vries HJ, Geertzen JH, Reneman MF. Dose or content? Effectiveness of pain rehabilitation programs for patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Pain 2014; 155 179–89.
Dose or content? Effectiveness of pain rehabilitation programs for patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24135435PubMed |

[13]  International Association for the Study of Pain. Pain Treatment Services. 2020 Available at: https://www.iasp-pain.org/Education/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=1381.

[14]  Lewis GN, Bean D, Mowat R. How have chronic pain management programs progressed? A mapping review. Pain Pract 2019; 19 767–84.
How have chronic pain management programs progressed? A mapping review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 31187931PubMed |

[15]  Ehde DM, Dillworth TM, Turner JA. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for individuals with chronic pain: Efficacy, innovations, and directions for research. Am Psychol 2014; 69 153–66.
Cognitive-behavioral therapy for individuals with chronic pain: Efficacy, innovations, and directions for research.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 24547801PubMed |

[16]  Travaglini LE, Treadwell TW, Reisch EE. Confidentiality and cohesion in groups: Collaborative story building and telling as a means of improving the therapeutic experience. Group 2012; 36 317–31.

[17]  Goldman S, Brettle A, McAndrew S. A client focused perspective of the effectiveness of Counselling for Depression (CfD). Couns Psychother Res 2016; 16 288–97.
A client focused perspective of the effectiveness of Counselling for Depression (CfD).Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[18]  Renjilian DA, Perri MG, Nezu AM, McKelvey WF, Shermer RL, Anton SD. Individual versus group therapy for obesity: effects of matching participants to their treatment preferences. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001; 69 717–21.
Individual versus group therapy for obesity: effects of matching participants to their treatment preferences.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 11550739PubMed |

[19]  von Below C, Werbart A, Rehnberg S. Experiences of overcoming depression in young adults in psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Euro J Psychother Counsel 2010; 12 129–47.
Experiences of overcoming depression in young adults in psychoanalytic psychotherapy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[20]  Roberts NP, Roberts PA, Jones N, Bisson JI. Psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 2015; 38 25–38.
Psychological interventions for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 25792193PubMed |

[21]  Nevonen L, Broberg AG. A comparison of sequenced individual and group psychotherapy for patients with bulimia nervosa. Int J Eat Disord 2006; 39 117–27.
A comparison of sequenced individual and group psychotherapy for patients with bulimia nervosa.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16231341PubMed |

[22]  Vos T, Corry J, Haby MM, Carter R, Andrews G. Cost-effectiveness of cognitive–behavioural therapy and drug interventions for major depression. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2005; 39 683–92.
| 16050922PubMed |

[23]  Critchley DJ, Ratcliffe J, Noonan S, Jones RH, Hurley MV. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three types of physiotherapy used to reduce chronic low back pain disability: A Pragmatic Randomized trial with economic evaluation. Spine 2007; 32 1474–81.
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three types of physiotherapy used to reduce chronic low back pain disability: A Pragmatic Randomized trial with economic evaluation.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17572614PubMed |

[24]  McPherson S, Wicks C, Tercelli I. Patient experiences of psychological therapy for depression: a qualitative metasynthesis. BMC Psychiatry 2020; 20 313
Patient experiences of psychological therapy for depression: a qualitative metasynthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 32552748PubMed |

[25]  Embuldeniya G, Veinot P, Bell E, Bell M, Nyhof-Young J, Sale JEM, et al The experience and impact of chronic disease peer support interventions: A qualitative synthesis. Patient Educ Couns 2013; 92 3–12.
The experience and impact of chronic disease peer support interventions: A qualitative synthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23453850PubMed |

[26]  Burlingame GM, Seebeck JD, Janis RA, Whitcomb KE, Barkowski S, Rosendahl J, et al Outcome differences between individual and group formats when identical and nonidentical treatments, patients, and doses are compare a 25-year meta-analytic perspective. Psychotherapy (Chic) 2016; 53 446–61.
Outcome differences between individual and group formats when identical and nonidentical treatments, patients, and doses are compare a 25-year meta-analytic perspective.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27918191PubMed |

[27]  O’Keeffe M, Hayes A, McCreesh K, Purtill H, O’Sullivan K. Are group-based and individual physiotherapy exercise programmes equally effective for musculoskeletal conditions? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2017; 51 126–32.
Are group-based and individual physiotherapy exercise programmes equally effective for musculoskeletal conditions? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27343238PubMed |

[28]  Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67 361–70.
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 6880820PubMed |

[29]  Norton S, Cosco T, Doyle F, Done J, Sacker A. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: a meta confirmatory factor analysis. J Psychosom Res 2013; 74 74–81.
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: a meta confirmatory factor analysis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 23272992PubMed |

[30]  Turk DC, Dworkin RH, Trudeau JJ, Benson C, Biondi DM, Katz NP, et al Validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with acute low back pain. J Pain 2015; 16 1012–21.
Validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with acute low back pain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 26208762PubMed |

[31]  Faull K, Hills MD. The QE Health Scale (QEHS): assessment of the clinical reliability and validity of a spiritually based holistic health measure. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29 701–16.
The QE Health Scale (QEHS): assessment of the clinical reliability and validity of a spiritually based holistic health measure.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 17453992PubMed |

[32]  Faull K, Hills MD. The role of the spiritual dimension of the self as the prime determinant of health. Disabil Rehabil 2006; 28 729–40.
The role of the spiritual dimension of the self as the prime determinant of health.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 16809216PubMed |

[33]  Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D, Chou R, Cohen SP, Gross DP, et al Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet 2018; 391 2368–83.
Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29573872PubMed |

[34]  Schatman ME. International chronic pain management: international perspectives. PAIN: Clinical Updates. 2012; 20. Available at: https://s3.amazonaws.com/rdcms-iasp/files/production/public/Content/ContentFolders/Publications2/PainClinicalUpdates/Archives/PCU_20-7_web.pdf?ItemNumber=2065

[35]  Jeffery MM, Butler M, Stark A, Kane RL. Multidisciplinary pain programs for chronic noncancer pain. Technical Brief No. 8. (Prepared by Minnesota Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290–07–10064-I.). Rockville, MD; 2011.

[36]  Werber A, Schiltenwolf M. Treatment of lower back pain—the gap between guideline-based treatment and medical care reality. Health Care 2016; 4 44
Treatment of lower back pain—the gap between guideline-based treatment and medical care reality.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |

[37]  Barrett E, Hayes A, Kelleher M, Conroy C, Robinson K, O’Sullivan K, et al Exploring patient experiences of participating in a group exercise class for the management of nonspecific shoulder pain. Physiother Theory Pract 2018; 34 464–71.
Exploring patient experiences of participating in a group exercise class for the management of nonspecific shoulder pain.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29297720PubMed |

[38]  Bernhardsson S, Larsson MEH, Johansson K, Öberg B. “In the physio we trust”: A qualitative study on patients’ preferences for physiotherapy. Physiother Theory Pract 2017; 33 535–49.
“In the physio we trust”: A qualitative study on patients’ preferences for physiotherapy.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 28590787PubMed |

[39]  Puhan MA, Frey M, Büchi S, Schünemann HJ. The minimal important difference of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008; 6 46
The minimal important difference of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 18597689PubMed |

[40]  Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd Edition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.

[41]  Devereux-Fitzgerald A, Powell R, Dewhurst A, French DP. The acceptability of physical activity interventions to older adults: A systematic review and meta-synthesis. Soc Sci Med 2016; 158 14–23.
The acceptability of physical activity interventions to older adults: A systematic review and meta-synthesis.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 27104307PubMed |

[42]  Hurley M, Dickson K, Hallett R, Grant R, Hauari H, Walsh N, et al Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018; 4 CD010842
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 29664187PubMed |