Plant wilting can be caused either by the plant or by the soil
Ewa A. Czyż A B D and Anthony R. Dexter CA Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation (IUNG-PIB), ul. Czartoryskich 8, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland.
B University of Rzeszów, Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, Aleja Rejtana 16c, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland.
C Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation (IUNG-PIB), ul. Czartoryskich 8, 24-100 Pulawy, Poland.
D Corresponding author. Email: ewac@iung.pulawy.pl
Soil Research 50(8) 708-713 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR12189
Submitted: 19 July 2012 Accepted: 17 October 2012 Published: 21 December 2012
Abstract
In this paper, plant wilting is re-analysed and re-interpreted on the basis of previously published work. Wilting is considered only in terms of the stress caused by the matric suction of the soil water. Other factors that can induce wilting, such as salinity and plant pathogens, are not considered. It is found that there is confusion around the subject for two main reasons. First, it is usually assumed that the matric suction of the pore water that exists in soil samples when they are removed from pressure plate extractors is equal to the air pressure that was applied. Second (and this is a special case of the first reason), because the soil water content when most plants wilt is very close to that remaining in soil samples on pressure plates operating with an air pressure of 1.5 MPa, it is assumed that plants wilt at a pore water suction of 1.5 MPa. These assumptions are examined here, and it is shown that neither of them is true. Published results are used for the wilting condition. The recently described double-exponential (DE) equation for soil water retention is used for cases where the water is non-equilibrated because of hydraulic cut-off. The non-equilibrated condition is appropriate for plant roots because they, like pressure plate extractors, extract water from soil by immiscible displacement. The DE equation is used to illustrate the conditions under which plant wilting can be either a plant or a soil property. It is shown how this approach can be used to estimate the pore water suction at which plants would wilt because the soil is no longer able to supply water to their roots. It is demonstrated that the commonly used, but often erroneous, value for the wilting-point suction of h = 1.5 MPa is a consequence of the fact that this is the largest value of air pressure used in pressure cell extractors. It is therefore neither a plant nor a soil property, but is an artefact of the experimental procedure. The use of the DE equation for soil water retention shows that we know only that h ≤1.5 MPa, and that h can be as small as 0.2 or 0.3 MPa. Implications for estimation of plant water availability in soils, for plant breeding, and for soil microbial activity are discussed.
Additional keywords: hydraulic cut-off, permanent wilting point, pore water suction, pressure cell extractors, soil water retention characteristics.
References
Bittelli M, Flury M (2009) Errors in water retention curves determined with pressure plates. Soil Science Society of America Journal 73, 1453–1460.| Errors in water retention curves determined with pressure plates.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXhtFSqu7zP&md5=3366be1869f0befa88a5cafffaa784c8CAS |
Bohne K (2005) ‘An introduction into applied soil hydrology.’ (Catena Verlag: Reiskirchen, Germany)
Briggs LJ, Shantz HL (1912) ‘The wilting coefficient for different plants and its indirect determination.’ USDA Bureau of Plant Industry Bulletin No. 230. (Government Printing Office: Washington, DC)
Bruand A, Ould Mohamed S, Pagliai M, Begon JC (1992) Modifications structurales (assemblage élémentaire) liées à l’activité racinaire au sein de sols limono-argileux. Comptes Rendus d’Académie des Sciences, Paris, t. 315, II, 757–764.
Bruand A, Cousin I, Nicoullaud B, Duval O, Begon JC (1996) Backscattered electron scanning images of soil porosity for analysing soil compaction around roots. Soil Science Society of America Journal 60, 895–901.
| Backscattered electron scanning images of soil porosity for analysing soil compaction around roots.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XjtFams70%3D&md5=1c43a5eb718f8b4eb921f7a0b7c301f4CAS |
Chahal SS (2010) Evaluation of soil hydraulic limitations in determining plant-available water in light-textured soils. PhD Thesis, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Australia.
Cresswell HP, Green TW, McKenzie NJ (2008) The adequacy of pressure plate apparatus for determining soil water retention. Soil Science Society of America Journal 72, 41–49.
| The adequacy of pressure plate apparatus for determining soil water retention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXht1OgtLc%3D&md5=3465046a5d6dc21f8e90e61d135ca364CAS |
Dexter AR (1987) Compression of soil around roots. Plant and Soil 97, 401–406.
| Compression of soil around roots.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dexter AR, Czyż EA, Richard G, Reszkowska A (2008) A user-friendly water retention function that takes account of the textural and structural pore spaces in soil. Geoderma 143, 243–253.
| A user-friendly water retention function that takes account of the textural and structural pore spaces in soil.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Dexter AR, Richard G, Czyż EA, Davy J, Hardy M, Duval O (2011) Clay dispersion from soil as a function of antecedent water potential. Soil Science Society of America Journal 75, 444–455.
| Clay dispersion from soil as a function of antecedent water potential.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DC%2BC3MXksFOlu7g%3D&md5=74621e00fcc250ecaaf48a0db42c88d7CAS |
Dexter AR, Czyż EA, Richard G (2012) Equilibrium, non-equilibrium and residual water: consequences for soil water retention. Geoderma 177–178, 63–71.
| Equilibrium, non-equilibrium and residual water: consequences for soil water retention.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Furr JR, Reeve JO (1945) Range of soil-moisture percentages through which some plants undergo permanent wilting in some soils from semiarid irrigated areas. Journal of Agricultural Research 71, 149–170.
Gardner WR, Nieman RH (1964) Lower limit of water availability to plants. Science 143, 1460–1462.
| Lower limit of water availability to plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3cvjslyquw%3D%3D&md5=e49f6e882c1a7fa9d085aeed1bcdb4a5CAS |
Gee GW, Ward AL, Zhang ZF, Campbell GS, Mathison J (2002) The influence of hydraulic non-equilibrium on pressure plate data. Vadose Zone Journal 1, 172–178.
| The influence of hydraulic non-equilibrium on pressure plate data.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Gliński J, Horabk J, Lipiec J (2011) ‘Encyclopedia of agrophysics.’ (Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)
Groenevelt PH, Grant CD (2004) A new model for the soil-water retention curve that solves the problem of residual water contents. European Journal of Soil Science 55, 479–485.
| A new model for the soil-water retention curve that solves the problem of residual water contents.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Kutilek M, Nielsen DR (1994) ‘Soil hydrology.’ (Catena Verlag: Cremlingen, Germany)
Kutilek M, Jendele L, Panayiotopoulos KP (2006) The influence of uniaxial compression upon pore size distribution in bi-model soils. Soil & Tillage Research 86, 27–37.
| The influence of uniaxial compression upon pore size distribution in bi-model soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Livingstone NJ, Topp GC (2008) Soil water potential. In ‘Soil sampling and methods of analysis’. 2nd edn (Eds MR Carter, EG Gregorich) pp. 963–979. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL)
Luckner L, van Genuchten MTh, Niesen DR (1989) A consistent set of parametric models for the two-phase flow of immiscible fluids in the subsurface. Water Resources Research 25, 2187–2193.
| A consistent set of parametric models for the two-phase flow of immiscible fluids in the subsurface.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaK3cXktFWksLs%3D&md5=8512efae7b9fd0378c736fdd109ca495CAS |
Monnier G, Stengel P, Fiès J-C (1973) Une méthode de mesure de la densité apparente de petits agglomérats terreux. Application à l’analyse des systèmes de porosité du sol. Annales Agronomiques 24, 533–545.
Nimmo JR (1991) Comment on the treatment of residual water content in “A consistent set of parametric models for the two-phase flow of immiscible fluids in the subsurface” by L Luckner et al. Water Resources Research 27, 661–662.
| Comment on the treatment of residual water content in “A consistent set of parametric models for the two-phase flow of immiscible fluids in the subsurface” by L Luckner et al.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Rab MA, Chandra S, Fisher PD, Robinson NJ, Kitching M, Aumann CD, Imhoff M (2011) Modelling and prediction of soil water contents at field capacity and permanent wilting of dryland cropping soils. Soil Research 49, 389–407.
| Modelling and prediction of soil water contents at field capacity and permanent wilting of dryland cropping soils.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Reynolds WD, Topp GC (2008) Soil water desorption and imbibition: tension and pressure techniques. In ‘Soil sampling and methods of analysis’. 2nd edn (Eds MR Carter, EG Gregorich) pp. 981–1005. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL)
Richard G, Cousin I, Sillon JF, Bruand A, Guérif J (2001) Effect of compaction on soil porosity: consequences on hydraulic properties. European Journal of Soil Science 52, 49–58.
| Effect of compaction on soil porosity: consequences on hydraulic properties.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
Richards LA (1941) A pressure-membrane extraction device for soil solution. Soil Science 51, 377–386.
| A pressure-membrane extraction device for soil solution.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaH3MXkvFSqtw%3D%3D&md5=fef3a09a7d7ffae1c98ccfcd371efa5bCAS |
Richards LA, Weaver LR (1943) Fifteen-atmosphere percentage as related to the permanent wilting percentage. Soil Science 56, 331–340.
| Fifteen-atmosphere percentage as related to the permanent wilting percentage.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaH2cXhvFamtg%3D%3D&md5=53aef70857548de77874f271202f45daCAS |
Stengel P (1979) Utilisation de l’analyse des systèmes de porosité pour le charactérisation de l’état physique des sols in situ. Annales Agronomiques 30, 27–51.
Tolk JA (2003) Soils, permanent wilting points. In ‘Encyclopedia of water science’. pp. 927–929. (Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York)
Townend J, Reeve MJ, Carter A (2001) Water release characteristic. In ‘Soil and environmental analysis: physical methods’. 2nd edn (Eds KA Smith, CE Mullins) pp. 95–140. (Marcel Dekker Inc.: New York)
Veihmeyer FJ, Hendrickson AH (1928) Soil moisture at permanent wilting of plants. Plant Physiology 3, 355–357.
| Soil moisture at permanent wilting of plants.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | 1:CAS:528:DyaB1MXnsl2j&md5=1a77b0bf3a44a536fc615fd86794bf87CAS |
Whiteley GM, Hewitt JS, Dexter AR (1982) The buckling of plant roots. Physiologia Plantarum 54, 333–342.
| The buckling of plant roots.Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar |
