Free Standard AU & NZ Shipping For All Book Orders Over $80!
Register      Login
Soil Research Soil Research Society
Soil, land care and environmental research
Shopping Cart: ( empty )
You are here: Home > Journals > SR > SR09150
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Contents Vol 48(3)

Soil pH buffering capacity: a descriptive function and its application to some acidic tropical soils

Paul N. Nelson A B C and Ninghu Su A B
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

A School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Cairns, Qld 4870, Australia.

B Department of Environment and Resource Management, Mareeba, Qld 4880, Australia.

C Corresponding author. Email: paul.nelson@jcu.edu.au

Australian Journal of Soil Research 48(3) 201-207 https://doi.org/10.1071/SR09150
Submitted: 20 August 2009  Accepted: 15 December 2009   Published: 6 May 2010

Abstract

Calculation of soil acidification rates requires knowledge of pH buffering capacity (pHBC), which is measured using titration methods. The pHBC is often quoted as a single value for a particular soil, implying a linear relationship between pH and the amount of acid or alkali added. However, over its whole range, the relationship is sigmoid rather than linear, and in many soils pH is low or high enough to be outside of the linear range. In this work we fitted a simple sigmoid function to pH buffer curves of 8 tropical Australian soils obtained using one titration method and 58 Papua New Guinean (PNG) soils obtained using another titration method. The function described the curves well for all soils (adjusted r2 > 0.93 for all samples and >0.99 for 90% of samples), irrespective of the titration method, allowing pHBC to be calculated as a function of pH across the range of pH values established. Using the function, the contribution of variable charge to pHBC was calculated for the PNG soils; on average it was 93% at the pH buffer curves’ inflection point, which corresponds with the soil’s minimum pHBC. Factors other than variable charge became important at pH (1 : 5, 0.002 m CaCl2) values <4.8 or >6.0. The relationship between pHBC and soil organic matter content was closest at pH 6.0–6.5. Application of the sigmoid function could facilitate more accurate assessments of acidification risks, acidification rates, and potential management interventions, particularly as soils become increasingly acidic.

Additional keywords: soil acidification, charge fingerprint, variable charge, organic matter, cation exchange capacity, Papua New Guinea, Andosol, sigmoid function.


Acknowledgments

The Papua New Guinea Oil Palm Research Association (PNGOPRA) funded the collection and analyses of the PNG soils and made the data available. Clay content of the PNG soils was measured by Sue Berthelsen. Students of ‘Applied Soil Science’ at James Cook University in Cairns analysed the Australian soils. We are grateful to Phil Moody, Mike Webb, Gavin Gillman, and John Armour for helpful comments.


References


Ahern C, Weinand M, Eldershaw V (1993) Soil pH and acidification risk in non-arid Queensland. Australian Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 6, 44–49. open url image1

Aitken RL, Moody PW (1994) The effect of valence and ionic strength on the measurement of pH buffer capacity. Australian Journal of Soil Research 32, 975–984.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Aitken RL, Moody PW, McKinley PG (1990a) Lime requirement of acidic Queensland soils. I. Relationships between soil properties and pH buffer capacity. Australian Journal of Soil Research 28, 695–701.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Aitken RL, Moody PW, McKinley PG (1990b) Lime requirement of acidic Queensland soils. II. Comparison of laboratory methods for predicting lime requirement. Australian Journal of Soil Research 28, 703–715.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Barrow NJ, Cox VC (1990) A quick and simple method for determining the titration curve and estimating the lime requirement of soil. Australian Journal of Soil Research 28, 685–694.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Bloom PR (2000) Soil pH and pH buffering. In ‘Handbook of soil science’. (Eds ME Sumner, et al.) pp. B333–B352. (CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL)

Brady NC , Weil RR (2008) ‘The nature and properties of soils.’ 14th edn (Pearson Education: Upper Saddle River, NJ)

Dolling PJ (1995) Effect of lupins and location on soil acidification rates. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 35, 753–763.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Dolling PJ, Porter WM (1994) Acidification rates in the central wheatbelt of Western Australia. 1. On a deep yellow sand. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 34, 1155–1164.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Dolling PJ, Porter WM, Rowland IC (1994) Acidification rates in the central wheatbelt of Western Australia. 2. On a sandy duplex soil. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 34, 1165–1172.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Enderlin NG , Barry EV , Phillip SR (1997) ‘Soils of the Mareeba-Dimbulah Irrigation Area (MDIA).’ (Queensland Department of Natural Resources: Mareeba, Qld)

Follett RH, Follett RF (1983) Soil and lime requirement tests for the 50 states and Puerto Rico. Journal of Agronomic Education 12, 9–17. open url image1

Gillman GP , Gillman KT (2001) Magnesium deficiency project. Final Report to PNG Oil Palm Research Association, Townsville, Qld.

Gillman GP, Sumpter EA (1986) Modification of the compulsive exchange method for measuring exchange characteristics of soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 24, 61–66.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Helyar KR , Conyers MK , Cowling AM (1995) Reactions buffering pH in acid soils treated with lime. In ‘Plant–soil interactions at low pH’. (Eds RA Date, NJ Grundon, GE Rayment, ME Probert) pp. 117–123. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Helyar KR, Cregan PD, Godyn DL (1990) Soil acidity in New South Wales—current pH values and estimates of acidification rates. Australian Journal of Soil Research 28, 523–537.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Helyar KR , Porter WM (1989) Soil acidification, its measurement and the processes involved. In ‘Soil acidity and plant growth’. (Ed. AD Robson) pp. 61–101. (Academic Press: Sydney)

Hochman Z , Braithwaite S , Probert ME , Verburg K , Helyar KR (1998) SOILpH—a new APSIM module for management of soil acidification. In ‘Proceedings of the 9th Australian Agronomy Conference’. Wagga Wagga, NSW. pp. 709–712. (Australian Society of Agronomy: Wagga Wagga, NSW)

Hochman Z, Crocker GJ, Dettman EB (1995) Predicting lime-induced changes in soil pH from exchangeable aluminium, soil pH, total exchangeable cations and organic carbon values measured on unlimed soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 33, 31–41.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lesturgez G, Poss R, Noble A, Grünberger O, Chintachao W, Tessier D (2006) Soil acidification without pH drop under intensive cropping systems in Northeast Thailand. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 114, 239–248.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Magdoff FR, Bartlett RJ (1985) Soil pH buffering revisited. Soil Science Society of America Journal 49, 145–148. open url image1

McLean EO, Dumford SW, Coronnel F (1966) A comparison of several methods of determining lime requirements of soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 30, 26–30.
|  CAS |
open url image1

Moody PW, Aitken RL (1997) Soil acidification under some tropical agricultural systems. 1. Rates of acidification and contributing factors. Australian Journal of Soil Research 35, 163–173.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Murtha GG , Cannon MG , Smith CD (1996) Soils of the Babinda-Cairns Area, North Queensland. CSIRO Division of Soils Divisional Report No. 123.

NLWRA (2001) Australian Agriculture Assessment 2001. National Land and Water Resources Audit, Canberra. Available at: www.nlwra.gov.au/products/list/3705?page=14

Noble AD, Cannon M, Muller D (1997) Evidence of accelerated soil acidification under Stylosanthes-dominated pasture. Australian Journal of Soil Research 35, 1309–1322.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | CAS | open url image1

Noble AD, Middleton C, Nelson PN, Rogers LG (2002) Risk mapping of soil acidification under Stylosanthes in northern Australian rangelands. Australian Journal of Soil Research 40, 257–267.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Oorts K, Vanlauwe B, Pleysier J, Merckx R (2004) A new method for the simultaneous measurement of pH-dependent cation exchange capacity and pH buffering capacity. Soil Science Society of America Journal 68, 1578–1585.
|  CAS |
open url image1

Porter WM , McLay CDA , Dolling PJ (1995) Rates and sources of acidification in agricultural systems of southern Australia. In ‘Plant–soil interactions at low pH’. (Eds RA Date, NJ Grundon, GE Rayment, ME Probert) pp. 75–83. (Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands)

Ridley AM, Helyar KR, Slattery WJ (1990) Soil acidification under subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.) pastures in north-eastern Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30, 195–201.
| Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sumner ME , Noble AD (2003) Soil acidification: The world story. In ‘Handbook of soil acidity’. (Ed. Z Rengel) pp. 1–28. (Marcel Dekker: New York)

Verburg K , Braschkat J , Hochman Z , Moore AD , Helyar KR , Probert ME , Hargreaves JNG , Simpson RJ (2003) Modeling acidification processes in agricultural systems. In ‘Handbook of soil acidity’. (Ed. Z Rengel) pp. 135–187. (Marcel Dekker: New York)