Register      Login
Crop and Pasture Science Crop and Pasture Science Society
Plant sciences, sustainable farming systems and food quality
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Changes in the composition and size distribution of endosperm proteins from bug-damaged wheats

D. Sivri, I. L. Batey, D. J. Skylas, L. Daqiq and C. W. Wrigley

Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 55(4) 477 - 483
Published: 30 April 2004

Abstract

In this study, grain that had been damaged by the bug Eurygaster spp. and/or Aelia spp., plus some undamaged grain, was selected from hard red winter (HRW) wheat. The changes in endosperm proteins were determined by 2-dimensional (2-D) electrophoresis and size-exclusion high-performance liquid chromatography (SE-HPLC). Although some new protein spots and a slight decrease in the staining intensities of some polypeptides were observed in the 2-D map of the bug-damaged sample, other parts of the gels were similar to the sound (control) sample in terms of relative mobilities and intensities of the polypeptide spots. The major difference between bug-damaged and control samples was that a group of polypeptides, presumably HMW-glutenins, shifted to a more basic region of the map. The SE-HPLC patterns of the total proteins extracted from control and bug-damaged samples in SDS-buffer showed that they differed in the size distribution of the polymeric glutenin protein and in their glutenin/gliadin ratios. The solubility of proteins in SDS buffer was greater in the bug-damaged sample. The 'unextractable' polymeric protein (only extractable in SDS-buffer after sonication) (UPP %) was significantly lower in the bug-damaged sample than in the control. The results of 2-D analysis and the decline in the quantity of unextractable proteins in SDS buffer suggest that bug-protease causes dough weakening by degradation of polymeric glutenin, presumably by hydrolysis, and possibly other mechanisms that affect the aggregation of the gluten molecules.

Keywords: bug protease, gluten depolymerisation.

https://doi.org/10.1071/AR03185

© CSIRO 2004

Committee on Publication Ethics


Export Citation Get Permission

View Dimensions